Montana · Nonprofit
WILDLIFE ECOLOGY INSTITUTE
WILDLIFE ECOLOGY INSTITUTE (Montana) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $301,138 to it, the largest being Dorrance Family Foundation ($98,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2024
- $327k
- Funders on record
- 6
- Grants received
- $301k
- Net assets
- $-40053
What Wildlife Ecology Institute does
Mission
Advance wildlife management and conservation through applied research and education activities.
As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.
Programs
Muskrat populations have been experiencing large-scale populationdeclines across at least the eastern half of the u.s., but we currentlydo not understand the mechanisms associated with these declines. Thisspecies has a positive influence on wetland ecosystems, and can beconsidered an indicator species of wetland health. We have transitionedinto phase ii of our research in the great lakes basin, which is builtupon the foundation of our work during phase I, but also recentresearch of others. Phase ii is a focused field-based investigation toevaluate muskrat demographics and health across multiple study sitesthat were selected across a gradient of habitat and hydrologyconditions.
$137,775 spent42% of program spendingGray foxes are a valuable and understudied furbearer across its entire range. Several indices suggest range contractions in indiana, but also other midwest states. The factor(s) causing these distributional changes is unknown, but may be linked to habitat loss and fragmentation, changing mesocarnivore (e.g., coyote) community structure, disease, and other factors, and likely is a complex relationship among these factors. We are assessing gray fox populations at two study sites in indiana through a 4-year comprehensive study designed to directly assess causes of population changes of gray foxes, and to provide recommendations for management of this species that can be applied in indiana, but also other midwest states.
$126,418 spent38% of program spendingThe kit fox is a canid species that is sensitive to effects of perturbations in their semi-arid environment. The distribution of kit foxes at their northern periphery in oregon is poorly defined. During 2024, we initiated a targeted inventory via camera-based survey for kit foxes based on locations in unsurveyed areas to fill in knowledge gaps; use data collected from our proposed survey, and previous surveys and other data, to construct a species distribution map (I.e., habitat suitability) for kit foxes; and develop recommendations for wildlife and land management using a landscape-scale approach that includes multiple land uses, considers other wildlife species of conservation interest(e.g., greater sage-grouse, and potentially identifies conservation hotspots based on overlapping areas of conservation concern.
$39,739 spent12% of program spendingBlack-footed ferrets were once thought to be extinct, but after discovering a single remnant population, a successful captive-breeding and reintroduction program was developed and implemented. However,despite the achievements of captive-breeding and reintroduction efforts, conservation of this rare mustelid currently faces substantial challenges. Our ongoing work includes collaborations with state, tribal, and federal agencies, and other ngos, to develop effective and efficient techniques for managing the substantial impacts of sylvatic plague on populations of ferrets and prairie dogs, to assess field techniques (traditional spotlighting, infrared cameras, scent-detection dogs) to improve monitoring of ferret populations, and other conservation effort for this federally endangered species.
$16,445 spent5% of program spendingDecisions related to management of furbearers encompass a complex array of management objectives across diverse taxa. These complex decisions often involve increased scrutiny and opposition through external and internal sources, causing threats to the integrity of furbearer management at the state, national, and international levels. Science-based management is critical for state agencies to make informed and defensible regulatory decisions; however, there currently is no comprehensive and contemporary science-based reference available to guide and improve furbearer management. The 1987 book, Wild Furbearer Management and Conservation in North America (Novak et al. 1987), was a critical resource that filled that role for many years. However, this resource lacks critical accomplishments and advancements achieved through furbearer management during the past three decades. Our project will produce a comprehensive and contemporary science-based book to help proactively guide current and future efforts of furbearer management programs, including through education and training of wildlife professionals, hunters, and trappers; identification of current knowledge gaps and applied research…
$8,258 spent3% of program spending
The 5 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $328,635.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $329k to $920k (+179%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2019 25% · 2020 98% · 2021 81% · 2022 70% · 2023 89% · 2024 100%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
101% of WILDLIFE ECOLOGY INSTITUTE’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (88% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income fell $50k → $41k.
1 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of WILDLIFE ECOLOGY INSTITUTE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
WILDLIFE ECOLOGY INSTITUTE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 33% of grant income and the top three 84%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
65% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund WILDLIFE ECOLOGY INSTITUTE.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 95% · 2019 100% · 2020 86% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
WILDLIFE ECOLOGY INSTITUTE draws 86% of its grant income from funders outside Montana, across 5 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $164 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
WILDLIFE ECOLOGY INSTITUTE has grown faster than half of the 4,264 environment nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,264 environment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024
Government funding WILDLIFE ECOLOGY INSTITUTE receives
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $940k on record — $930k federal, $9k state.
- Department of the Interior$892k
- Department of Agriculture$38k
- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES NON-IT$9k
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Organizations like WILDLIFE ECOLOGY INSTITUTE
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Montana
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
87% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
98%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WILDLIFE ECOLOGY INSTITUTE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds WILDLIFE ECOLOGY INSTITUTE?
- WILDLIFE ECOLOGY INSTITUTE (Montana) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $301,138 to it, the largest being Dorrance Family Foundation ($98,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does WILDLIFE ECOLOGY INSTITUTE have?
- IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $301,138 in grants to WILDLIFE ECOLOGY INSTITUTE, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of WILDLIFE ECOLOGY INSTITUTE?
- Dorrance Family Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $98,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like WILDLIFE ECOLOGY INSTITUTE find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Montana. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
Play a game about who funds Wildlife Ecology Institute →
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 6 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing