Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Lee and Linda Meier Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$49kEnvironment$43kFood & Nutrition$35kRecreation & Sports$32kHealth$19kCivil Rights$19kYouth Development$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$665k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$15,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$10,000
SAN FRANCISCO-MARIN FOOD BANK$10,000
SAN FRANCISCO BAY KEEPER$2,000
FRIENDS OF THE URBAN FOREST$1,000
HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS$1,000
GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVA$1,000
MOUNTAIN PLAY ASSOCIATION$500
Individual grant recipient$250
NO CA PGA FOUNDATION$250
Individual grant recipient$200
PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE HUMMINGBIRD ALLIANCE: $3k → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $2k → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $2k → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $1k → 10%THE HUMMINGBIRD ALLIANCE: $1k → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $1k → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $1k → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $1k → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $1k → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $1k → 10%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IA
OH
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
TN
SC
DC
OK
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$247k · 32 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
20

Total granted

$247k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+18%

Still filing today

78%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalEnvironmentRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $49k · revenue +98%
  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +74%
  • B
    Baykeeper
    9× · 2017–2025 · $25k · revenue +151%

Funded once

  • UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -47%
  • TP
    TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +18%
  • MC
    Meritus College Fund
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
3
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
4
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
5
Save the Bay

Our vision is a future where everyone benefits from a healthy san francisco bay, resilient to climate change and ringed by 100,000 acres of vibrant tidal marsh.

Environment
6
The Trust for Public Land

The trust for public land creates parks and protects land for people, ensuring healthy, livable communities for generations to come. in the past year, we helped communities to plan for parks and conservation, fund parks and conservation,…

Environment
7
National Forest Foundation

The national forest foundation (nff), chartered by congress, turns america's love of nature into meaningful action for 193-million acre national forest system through on the ground program work and grant making activities, and accepts and…

Recreation & Sports
8
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
9
The Bar Association of San Francisco

The bar association of san francisco champions equal access to justice and promotes humanity, excellence, and diversity in the legal profession. we provide legal services to disadvantaged and underserved individuals in san francisco. we…

—
10
Parks California

As california state parks' statutory non-profit partner, we have a clear mission - to help strengthen parks and inspire all people to experience these extraordinary places.

Environment
11
San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory

The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to promote sustainability in the Bay Area and beyond by engaging communities in avian science, habitat restoration, and education.

Environment
12
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California State Parks Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Francisco Park Conservancy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/38
Grantees still filing
28/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $48,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA IN…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $21,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $4,342 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC+2 more: $2,175 · InternationalGOLDEN GATE NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVANCY: $29,000 · EnvironmentGOLDEN GATE NATIONAL PARKS …Baykeeper: $24,500 · EnvironmentBaykeeperFRIENDS OF THE URBAN FOREST: $7,500 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE URBAN FORESTSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $6,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION+1 more: $200 · EnvironmentSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $45,000 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANKACLU FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherACLU FOUNDATIONMeritus College Fund: $4,000 · OtherTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $5,000 · OtherTIPPING POINT COMMUNITYBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $5,000 · OtherBREAKTHROUGH T1DUPWARDLY GLOBAL: $4,342 · Other+26 more: $18,300 · Other+26 moreHUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $11,000 · Human ServicesREADY SET SAFE: $3,500 · Human ServicesSan Francisco CASA: $13,500 · Civil RightsUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationSan Francisco Education Fund: $1,000 · EducationFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $600 · Education+3 more: $650 · EducationGREATER FARALLONES ASSOCIATION: $6,500 · AnimalsSAN FRANCISCO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $1,000 · Animals
International$76,017Environment$67,200Other$86,642Human Services$14,500Civil Rights$13,500Education$12,250Animals$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $48,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGOLDEN GATE NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVANCY: $29,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBaykeeper: $24,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $21,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSan Francisco CASA: $13,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $11,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE URBAN FOREST: $7,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER FARALLONES ASSOCIATION: $6,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $4,342 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUPWARDLY GLOBAL: $4,342 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMeritus College Fund: $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetREADY SET SAFE: $3,500 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION: $1,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFrancisco Park Conservancy: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FIRST TEE: $1,350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBRAZIL FOUNDATION: $1,175 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREMOTE AREA MEDICAL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNTAIN PLAY ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSan Francisco Education Fund: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOLINAS MUSEUM: $600 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDOMINICAN UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTINSON BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER: $200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR SANTA BARBARA CITY COLLEGE: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Baykeeper ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds San Francisco CASA ↗
  • Who funds HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE URBAN FOREST ↗
  • Who funds GREATER FARALLONES ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UPWARDLY GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds Meritus College Fund ↗
  • Who funds READY SET SAFE ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Francisco Park Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FIRST TEE ↗
  • Who funds BRAZIL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds REMOTE AREA MEDICAL ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN PLAY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds San Francisco Education Fund ↗
  • Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOLINAS MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA22.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Lisa & Douglas Goldman Fund · McNabb Foundation · Salesforce Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · United Way of the Bay Area · The James Irvine Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lee and Linda Meier Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lee and Linda Meier Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Lee and Linda Meier Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Lee and Linda Meier Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lee and Linda Meier Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph