Skip to content

Arizona · Private foundation

The Lawrence Institute

THE LAWRENCE INSTITUTE SUPPORTS NOT-FOR-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS BY PROVIDING PRO-BONO TRAINING AND FINANCIAL SUPPORT THROUGH ANNUAL GRANTS. Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
Organizations funded FY2023
0%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2023
$15,000
Largest grant, FY2023
$15,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 11
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2023
1
Total assets, FY2023
$11k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations The Lawrence Institute funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationInternationalHealthYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20231$15k0%
FY20221$15k0%
FY20215$29k60%
FY20205$106k60%
FY20193$238k67%
FY20185$403k40%
FY201711$440kn/a
97% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

International$653kCrime & Legal$181kRecreation & Sports$170kEducation$58kCommunity Improvement$50kHealth$40kPhilanthropy$34kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Golf Fore Africa Inc$565,04977%
Advocates for Africa's Children Inc$250,072251%
New Pathways For Youth$65,0001n/a
Bioaccel$50,00018%
Arizona State University Foundation for a New American University$45,00030%
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation$39,50010%
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville$33,9142n/a
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville Foundation$29,00010%
Time Out Foundation$20,000133%
McDowell Mountain Community Church$12,0001n/a
Show all 16 grantees
All grantees of The Lawrence Institute by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Golf Fore Africa Inc$565,04977%
Advocates for Africa's Children Inc$250,072251%
New Pathways For Youth$65,0001n/a
Bioaccel$50,00018%
Arizona State University Foundation for a New American University$45,00030%
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation$39,50010%
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville$33,9142n/a
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville Foundation$29,00010%
Time Out Foundation$20,000133%
McDowell Mountain Community Church$12,0001n/a
Umom New Day Centers Inc$10,00010%
Social Venture Partners Tucson$5,5001n/a
Solid Rock Missions Dba Solid Rock International$5,4001n/a
Phoenix Country Day School$4,00010%
Silver Stirrup Foundation$2,0001n/a
International Rescue Committee INC$2,00010%

Plus 5 recipients with no EIN on record ($109k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

The Lawrence Institute supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 2 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 10 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGolf Fore Africa Inc: $565,049 over 7y, 7.0% of budgetAdvocates for Africa's Children Inc: $250,072 over 2y, 51% of budgetBioaccel: $50,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetArizona State University Foundation for a New American University: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPhoenix Children's Hospital Foundation: $39,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSouthern Illinois University Edwardsville Foundation: $29,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTime Out Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetUmom New Day Centers Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPhoenix Country Day School: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 10.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Lawrence Institute with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Lawrence Institute?

Find your warmest path to The Lawrence Institute through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Lawrence Institute

How much does The Lawrence Institute give?
The Lawrence Institute reported 1 grants totaling $15,000 in its FY2023 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 11 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does The Lawrence Institute fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2023, its largest causes are International (52%), Crime & Legal (14%), Recreation & Sports (14%).
Who are The Lawrence Institute's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2023: Golf Fore Africa Inc ($565k), Advocates for Africa's Children Inc ($250k), New Pathways For Youth ($65k).
Does The Lawrence Institute fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Lawrence Institute accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Lawrence Institute?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include American Endowment Foundation, Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc, Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program.
Where is The Lawrence Institute based?
The Lawrence Institute is based in AZ.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lawrence Institute’s filings →

More from the funding graph