· Private foundation
The Lawrence Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $63k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $433k
- $50k–250k39 grants · $2.7M
- $250k+1 grant · $250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TIDES FOUNDATION | $250,000 |
| ARBOR RISING ( FORMERLY ARBOR BROTHERS) | $100,000 |
| BROADWAY HOUSING COMMUNITIES INC (BHC) | $100,000 |
| URBAN PATHWAYS | $100,000 |
| BREAKTHROUGH NEW YORK | $100,000 |
| SPARKYOUTH NYC (FORMERLY CATALOG FOR GIVING) | $100,000 |
| MOUNT SINAI ADOLESCENT HEALTH CENTER | $100,000 |
| EXALT | $100,000 |
| COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS | $100,000 |
| NEIGHBORS LINK CORP | $100,000 |
| BOWERY RESIDENTS' COMMITTEE (BRC) | $100,000 |
| BREAKING GROUND | $100,000 |
| THE HOPE PROGRAM | $75,000 |
| COOPERATE INC (COOP) | $75,000 |
| MONTEFIORE (BRONX HEALTH COLLECTIVE) | $75,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $2.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
90 repeat relationships — 58 still active in FY2024, 32 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $240k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NLNEIGHBORS LINK CORP5× · 2020–2024 · $480k · revenue +153%
COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC5× · 2020–2024 · $475k · revenue +17%- BGBREAKING GROUND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION5× · 2020–2024 · $460k · revenue +41%
Funded once
- BBBHC - BROADWAY HOUSING COMMUNITIES INCone grant, 2020 · $100k
- SNSPARKYOUTH NYC INCone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -2%
- CMCHANGE MACHINE (THE FINANCIAL CLINIC)one grant, 2020 · $95k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.
The opportunity network ignites the drive, curiosity, and agency of underrepresented students on their paths to and through college and into thriving careers, powered by our commitment to access and community.
To manage the brooklyn navy yard for the city of new york, specifically to expand job opportunities for new yorkers by fostering the development of small businesses.
Spark lasting social justice change, mobilizing people, capital, & expertise for a fair brooklyn.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
Dedicated to improving the quality of life and increasing the self sufficiency of individuals with emotional, social and economic barriers. this is accomplished by providing direct support and assistance needed to enable individuals to…
Legal services nyc is a non-profit organization that provides free civil legal assistance to low-income people in new york city. a community-based organization serving more than 100,000 people annually, lsnyc is the nation's largest…
Job path supports people with autism and other developmental disabilities as they make choices about their lives and play valued roles in their communities. job path encourages people to explore what they want out of life and to chart…
Nyceec's mission is to deliver financing solutions and advance markets for energy efficiency and clean energy in communities.
Uwnyc works with a coalition of trusted partners to unite community power with citywide possibility. together, we meet today's most urgent needs while building transformative solutions for tomorrow - striving for health, opportunity, and…
Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy and the most unlike its peers is Soup Angels of Nyack Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
88 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 88 of the 141 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEIGHBORS LINK CORP ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds BREAKING GROUND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds URBAN PATHWAYS INC ↗
- Who funds BOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE INC ↗
- Who funds PEER HEALTH EXCHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOPE PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds LAWYERS FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds THE GO PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds GREEN CITY FORCE INC ↗
- Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVE SENTENCING AND EMPLOYMENT SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds The Children's Health Fund ↗
- Who funds GRACE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds ISLAND HARVEST LTD ↗
- Who funds PER SCHOLAS INC ↗
- Who funds YORK STREET PROJECT ↗
- Who funds BEHIND THE BOOK INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOMINGDALEFAMILYPROGRAMINC ↗
- Who funds STANLEY M ISAACS NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ACUMEN FUND INC ↗
- Who funds MARCY LAB INC ↗
- Who funds EMMA'S TORCH LTD ↗
- Who funds BOTTOMLESS CLOSET ↗
- Who funds JTP PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Robin Hood Foundation · The New York Community Trust · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Pinkerton Foundation · Brooklyn Community Foundation · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Ford Foundation · Booth Ferris Foundation Xxxxx4008 · Jewish Communal Fund · Tides Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Lawrence Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- York Street Project — 32% of income from government
- Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
- Hope for Haiti Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Lawrence Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Lawrence Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.