Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Lawrence and Florence Vanderberg Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$130kHousing & Shelter$55kArts & Culture$28kHealth$21kFood & Nutrition$17kPhilanthropy$10kCommunity Improvement$250
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Children and Family Research Center$10,000
The Storehouse$10,000
Council On Aging Henderson County$10,000
Apple Country Woodcrafters$5,300
Safelight$5,000
Habitat For Humanity$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Four Seasons Hospice$1,500
MANA FOOD BANK$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Green River Community Association: $250 → 12%UNC Health Foundation: $1k → 13%Pardee Hospital Foundation: $7k → 12%UNC Health Foundation: $1k → 13%Safelight: $5k → 12%Safelight: $5k → 12%Pardee Hospital Foundation: $5k → 12%Council On Aging Henderson County: $15k → 12%Council On Aging Henderson County: $15k → 12%Council On Aging Henderson County: $10k → 12%Children and Family Research Center: $10k → 12%Council On Aging Henderson County: $10k → 12%Children and Family Research Center: $10k → 12%Children and Family Research Center: $10k → 12%Council On Aging Henderson County: $10k → 12%Habitat For Humanity: $5k → 12%Habitat For Humanity: $5k → 12%Habitat For Humanity: $5k → 12%Four Seasons Hospice: $5k → 12%Four Seasons Hospice: $2k → 12%MANA FOOD BANK: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$258k · 12 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
1

Total granted

$258k
$250

Still filing today

58%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HR
    HENDERSONVILLE RESCUE MISSION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $40k · revenue +27%
  • IA
    Interfaith Assistance Ministry Inc
    2× · 2020–2021 · $40k · revenue +278%
  • AC
    APPLE COUNTRY WOODCRAFTERS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $16k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • GR
    GREEN RIVER COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $250
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hospice of Henderson County Inc

Co-creating the care experience means that our team of qualified professionals works with you, your family, and your existing healthcare team of providers to create a customized care plan, working together with the goal of providing you…

—
2
The Hunger and Health Coalition Inc

The hunger and health coalition relieves poverty and hunger for households experiencing economic hardship and food insecurity. we serve low-income and uninsured residents of avery, watauga and ashe counties who are forced to choose between…

Food & Nutrition
3
Habitat for Humanity of High Point Archdale & Trinity Inc

Habitat for Humanity of High Point, Archdale and Trinity is an ecumenical Christian movement whose goal is to build safe, decent, affordable homes for our neighbors in need. Through conscience and action, Habitat utilizes volunteer labor…

Housing & Shelter
4
The Housing Assistance Corporation

The housing assistance corporation is a public, non-profit organization committed to providing safe and affordable housing for persons of limited income living in henderson county and surrounding areas, because we believe every human being…

Housing & Shelter
5
Habitat for Humanity of Nc Inc

Seeking to put Gods love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. Habitat for Humanity of North Carolina…

Housing & Shelter
6
Habitat for Humanity Cabarrus County

Guided by God, Habitat Cabarrus transforms lives and our community by uniting all of Cabarrus County around the cause of decent, affordable housing for everyone.

Housing & Shelter
7
Habitat for Humanity Williamson -Maury

Habitat for humanity of williamson-maury (hfhwm) seeks to put god's love into action by partnering with communites to build affordable housing, inspiring hope and life-changing stability for families through homeownership.

—
8
Habitat for Humanity of Burke County Inc

Habitat for humanity works in partnership with god and people everywhere, from all walks of life, to develop communities with gods people in need by building houses, so that there are decent homes in decent communities in whigh gods people…

Housing & Shelter
9
Hancock County Habitat for Humanity

Partnering with economically disadvantaged individuals and families. Hancock County Habitat For Humanity seeks to eliminate poverty housing and to make decent, affordable shelter a matter of conscience and action.

—
10
Covenant HomeCare

Covenant HomeCare provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
11
Holston Habitat for Humanity Inc

Seeking to put Gods love into action, Holston Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
12
Helena Area Habitat for Humanity

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safelight Inc; the most unlike its peers is Apple Country Woodcrafters. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Council On Aging Henderson County: $60,000 · OtherCouncil On Aging Henderson CountyHENDERSONVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $40,000 · OtherHENDERSONVILLE RESCUE MISSIONChildren and Family Research Center: $30,000 · OtherChildren and Family Research CenterHenderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity: $15,000 · OtherHenderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for HumanityThe Storehouse: $15,000 · OtherThe StorehouseIndividual grant recipient: $11,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFour Seasons Hospice: $6,500 · Other+1 more: $250 · OtherInterfaith Assistance Ministry Inc: $40,000 · Human ServicesInterfaith Assist…PARDEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 · PhilanthropyPARDEE ME…SAFELIGHT INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropySAFELIGHT…APPLE COUNTRY WOODCRAFTERS: $16,400 · Arts & CultureUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · EducationMANNA FOOD BANK INC: $1,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$178,000Human Services$40,000Philanthropy$22,000Arts & Culture$16,400Education$2,000Food & Nutrition$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHENDERSONVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $40,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetInterfaith Assistance Ministry Inc: $40,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetAPPLE COUNTRY WOODCRAFTERS: $16,400 over 5y, 13% of budgetHenderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPARDEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSAFELIGHT INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HENDERSONVILLE RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds Interfaith Assistance Ministry Inc ↗
  • Who funds APPLE COUNTRY WOODCRAFTERS ↗
  • Who funds Henderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity ↗
  • Who funds PARDEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFELIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MANNA FOOD BANK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Henderson County IncNC17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Henderson County Inc · Wnc Bridge Foundation · The Cannon Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lawrence and Florence Vanderberg Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lawrence and Florence Vanderberg Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Lawrence and Florence Vanderberg Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Lawrence and Florence Vanderberg Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lawrence and Florence Vanderberg’s filings →

    More from the funding graph