Skip to content
The Laszlo N Tauber Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Laszlo N Tauber Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
49
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$337k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$17MInternational$8.6MHealth$4.1MHuman Services$2.6MReligion$2.5MEducation$677kSocial Science$477kCivil Rights$475kOther$0
02FY2024 · 49 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k21 grants · $63k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $302k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $583k
  • $250k+1 grant · $337k
$10,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$41M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW ISRAEL FUND$336,803
JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO$150,000
CONGREGATION RODEF SHOLOM$98,000
CONGREGATION EMANU-EL$90,000
CONGREGATION RODEF SHOLOM$75,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KISHORIT$70,000
BREAST CANCER PREVENTION PARTNERS$50,000
CONGREGATION EMANU-EL$50,000
CHABAD OF NASHOBA VALLEY$25,000
TUFTS UNIVERSITY$25,000
BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL$25,000
CONGREGATION EMANU-EL$25,000
J JEWISH NEWS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA$20,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE NATIONAL INSITUTE FOR PSYCHOBIOLOGY IN ISRAEL$20,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KISHORIT$18,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 88% of grant dollars ($38M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 12% that went abroad ($5.1M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FERRY HILL DAY CAMP & COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF EAST BAY: $200k → 10%OCEAN STATE JOB LOT CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $26k → 7%HEARTBEET LIFESHARING: $5k → 12%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF EAST BAY: $50k → 10%IMPACT CUBED: $10k → 11%MONTGOMERY HOSPICE: $5k → 8%OSHER MARIN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $15k → 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $210k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $200k → 10%TIDES CENTERSHALOM BAYIT: $10k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $50k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $5k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $5k → 10%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICES AGENCY: $3k → 8%TIDES CENTERSHALOM BAYIT: $5k → 10%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICES AGENCY: $3k → 8%TIDES CENTERSHALOM BAYIT: $5k → 10%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICES AGENCY: $3k → 8%TIDES CENTER: $5k → 10%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICES AGENCY: $3k → 8%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICES AGENCY: $3k → 8%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICES AGENCY: $3k → 8%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICES AGENCY: $3k → 8%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICES AGENCY: $3k → 8%COMMITTEE OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS: $1k → 17%COMMITTEE OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS: $1k → 17%CATHOLIC COALITION FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION: $2k → 8%CHILDREN'S COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO: $20k → 10%CATHOLIC COALITION FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION: $2k → 8%CHILDREN'S COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO: $20k → 10%CATHOLIC COALITION FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION: $2k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $417k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $300k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $290k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $50k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $17k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
WA
IL
WI
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
NC
DC
LA
FL

Beyond the US: 12% of all-years giving ($5.1M)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Israel$5.1M · 5 grants
Australia$5k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of The Laszlo N Tauber Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Laszlo N Tauber Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 14% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$24M · 74 repeat orgs$12M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

74 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2024, 54 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

74
69

Total granted

$24M
$12M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+24%

Still filing today

66%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $115k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    AMERICAN SOCIETY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA
    7× · 2017–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +57%
  • TP
    TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY
    3× · 2017–2020 · $1.5M · revenue +18%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KISHORIT INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $5.0M
  • ID
    INGRID D TAUBER FUND INC
    one grant, 2019 · $5.0M · revenue -81% · 85% of their budget
  • AS
    AMERICAN SOCIETY OF UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA
    one grant, 2018 · $477k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
3
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
4
Jewish Federation of San Diego County

Jewish federation of san diego county is dedicated to building a vibrant, caring, connected, and enduring jewish community.

—
5
The Jewish Studio Project

Through thought leadership, community programs, leadership development, and organizational partnerships, jsp is building a movement to activate the creative power of the jewish community.

Religion
6
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
7
Jews of Color Initiative

The Jews of Color Initiatives mission is to advance racial equity in the U.S. Jewish community by centering the leadership of Jews of Color and ensuring that our communities and institutions reflect the multiracial reality of the Jewish…

Civil Rights
8
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
9
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
10
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
11
Sandler Foundation

The foundation operates exclusively for charitable, educational or religious purposes by conducting or supporting activities for the benefit of, or to carry out the purposes of the jewish community federation of san francisco, the…

Philanthropy
12
Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma; the most unlike its peers is Aussie Rescue of the Mid Atlantic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

110 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 110 of the 169 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
104/110
Grantees still filing
77/110
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $5,000,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMOSHE HESS ASSOCIATION: $4,989,861 · OtherMOSHE HESS ASSOCIATIONJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO (ENDOWMENT FUND): $4,805,813 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO (ENDOWMENT…+87 more: $6,303,822 · Other+87 moreINGRID D TAUBER FUND INC: $5,000,000 · PhilanthropyINGRID D TAUBER FUND INCPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $2,323,908 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INCTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $1,500,000 · PhilanthropyTIPPING POINT COMMUNITYAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KISHORIT INC: $1,128,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KISHORIT IN…JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA: $948,477 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF …+12 more: $877,125 · Philanthropy+12 moreAMERICAN SOCIETY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA: $2,533,560 · InternationalAMERICAN SOC…NEW ISRAEL FUND: $1,696,849 · InternationalNEW ISRAEL F…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOBIOLOGY OF ISRAEL: $225,000 · International+12 more: $184,800 · InternationalUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $2,119,000 · EducationMILTON GOTTESMAN JEWISH DAY SCHOOL OF THE NATION'S CAPITAL: $103,000 · Education+11 more: $239,039 · EducationJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $1,073,500 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $460,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE EAST BAY: $250,000 · Human Services+11 more: $169,000 · Human ServicesBREAST CANCER PREVENTION PARTNERS: $370,000 · HealthAccess Institute for Psychological Services: $162,500 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $50,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S INN AT NIH INC: $50,000 · Health+8 more: $66,750 · HealthJewish Film Institute: $175,000 · Arts & CultureKQED INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $8,750 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $12,750 · Arts & Culture
Other$21,099,496Philanthropy$11,777,510International$4,640,209Education$2,461,039Human Services$1,952,500Health$699,250Arts & Culture$206,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINGRID D TAUBER FUND INC: $5,000,000 over 1y, 85% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA: $2,533,560 over 7y, 8.5% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $2,323,908 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $2,119,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND: $1,696,849 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $1,500,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KISHORIT INC: $1,128,000 over 7y, 15% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $1,073,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA: $948,477 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $460,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetLehrhaus Judaica dba HAMAQOM The Place: $443,333 over 2y, 23% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO MARIN & PENINSULA: $440,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetBREAST CANCER PREVENTION PARTNERS: $370,000 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $286,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEDLAVITCH JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF WASHINGTON DC INC: $250,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE EAST BAY: $250,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ITIM INC: $228,000 over 8y, 5.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOBIOLOGY OF ISRAEL: $225,000 over 5y, 99% of budgetJewish Film Institute: $175,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetAccess Institute for Psychological Services: $162,500 over 1y, 16% of budgetMILTON GOTTESMAN JEWISH DAY SCHOOL OF THE NATION'S CAPITAL: $103,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH LEARNINGWORKS: $100,625 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetAMERICA GIVES INC: $95,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetUS FRIENDS OF YAD EZRAH INC: $93,700 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER TEL HASHOMER INC: $90,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetBaton Rouge Youth Coalition Inc: $80,000 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetJEWISHColorado: $75,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSAFE & SOUND: $75,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetGRADUATE THEOLOGICAL UNION: $75,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetUrban Adamah: $57,200 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $54,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S INN AT NIH INC: $50,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetJumpstart Labs Inc DBA Jewish JUMPSTART JSLABS: $40,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUPSTART BAY AREA: $40,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetChildren's Council of San Francisco: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRISE AGAINST HUNGER INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $35,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $30,539 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSan Francisco Jewish Community Publications Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetALLIANT EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetOCEAN STATE JOB LOT CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $26,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYAD YAAKOV: $25,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetTHE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Foundation for MetroWest Inc: $22,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MEIR PANIM: $21,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INGRID D TAUBER FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
  • Who funds TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KISHORIT INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds Lehrhaus Judaica dba HAMAQOM The Place ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO MARIN & PENINSULA ↗
  • Who funds BREAST CANCER PREVENTION PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc ↗
  • Who funds EDLAVITCH JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF WASHINGTON DC INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE EAST BAY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ITIM INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOBIOLOGY OF ISRAEL ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Film Institute ↗
  • Who funds Access Institute for Psychological Services ↗
  • Who funds MILTON GOTTESMAN JEWISH DAY SCHOOL OF THE NATION'S CAPITAL ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH LEARNINGWORKS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA GIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds US FRIENDS OF YAD EZRAH INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER TEL HASHOMER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Fede…The Shimon Ben Joseph…Koret FoundationJohn Pritzker Family …Taube Foundation for …Combined Jewish Phila…Ralph & Marsha Guggen…The Jewish Community …Lisa & Douglas Goldma…Howard and Irene Levi…Ingrid D Tauber Fund …Lisa Stone Pritzker F…
Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & SonomaCA40.9× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation · Koret Foundation · John Pritzker Family Fund · Taube Foundation for Jewish Life and Culture · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Ralph & Marsha Guggenheim Family Foundation · The Jewish Community Foundation · Lisa & Douglas Goldman Fund · Howard and Irene Levine Family Foundation · Ingrid D Tauber Fund Inc · Lisa Stone Pritzker Family Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Laszlo N Tauber Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Laszlo N Tauber Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc: 46% of income from government
  • Heartbeet Lifesharing Corporation: 13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Children's Inn at Nih Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Bma Tenpoint Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Community Foundation for MetroWest Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Iris Music Project: 3% of income from government
  • Resist Inc: 2% of income from government
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Jewish Social Service Agency: 1% of income from government
  • Hebrew Home of Greater Washington Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Laszlo N Tauber Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Laszlo N Tauber Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 169 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Laszlo N Tauber Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home