· Private foundation
Ingrid D Tauber Fund Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $176k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $200k
- $250k+2 grants · $906k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UCSF FOUNDATION | $606,000 |
| TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY | $300,000 |
| SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL | $100,000 |
| INQUIRING SYSTEMS INC | $50,000 |
| CONGREGATION EMANU-EL | $50,000 |
| JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO | $45,755 |
| THE MAVEN PROJECT | $25,000 |
| FRIENDS OF SAN FRANCISCO ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL | $25,000 |
| BEKELEY REPERTORY THEATRE | $25,000 |
| SAN FRANCISCO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY | $25,000 |
| HAIR TO STAY | $10,000 |
| SAN FRANCISCO PSYCHOANALYTICS FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| AGAHOZO-SHALOM YOUTH VILLAGE | $10,000 |
| GREENLIGHT CLINIC | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AIAccess Institute for Psychological Services2× · 2021–2022 · $402k · revenue +27%
COMMUNITY INITIATIVES4× · 2017–2020 · $285k · revenue +254%- SFSan Francisco Center for Psychoanal5× · 2017–2022 · $130k · revenue +8%
Funded once
- CRCONGREGATION RODEF SHOLOMone grant, 2022 · $210k
- ASAMERICAN SOCIETY OF UNIVERSITY OF HAIFAone grant, 2018 · $138k
- CPCALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTERone grant, 2017 · $138k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Jewish Film Institute champions bold films and filmmakers that expand and evolve the Jewish story for audiences everywhere. Through its exhibition and artist development programs, JFI celebrates the spirit of film, inquiry,…
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.
The Jews of Color Initiatives mission is to advance racial equity in the U.S. Jewish community by centering the leadership of Jews of Color and ensuring that our communities and institutions reflect the multiracial reality of the Jewish…
Jewish federation of san diego county is dedicated to building a vibrant, caring, connected, and enduring jewish community.
The foundation operates exclusively for charitable, educational or religious purposes by conducting or supporting activities for the benefit of, or to carry out the purposes of the jewish community federation of san francisco, the…
Through thought leadership, community programs, leadership development, and organizational partnerships, jsp is building a movement to activate the creative power of the jewish community.
The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma and the most unlike its peers is Aim High. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds Access Institute for Psychological Services ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY INITIATIVES ↗
- Who funds San Francisco Center for Psychoanal ↗
- Who funds INQUIRING SYSTEMS INC ↗
- Who funds BAY AREA COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds HAIRTOSTAY ↗
- Who funds THE MAVEN PROJECT ↗
- Who funds RHODE ISLAND COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds Jewish Commmunity High School of the Bay ↗
- Who funds EDUCATORS INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS IN ↗
- Who funds Friends of San Francisco Animal Care and Control ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY AT STRYBING ARBORETUM ↗
- Who funds Urban Adamah ↗
- Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
- Who funds San Francisco Jewish Community Publications Inc ↗
- Who funds KATAHDIN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
- Who funds AGAHOZO-SHALOM YOUTH VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds JEANNE JUGAN RESIDENCE OF THE LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR INC ↗
- Who funds GREENLIGHT CLINIC ↗
- Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The Laszlo N Tauber Family Foundation Inc · John Pritzker Family Fund · Lisa & Douglas Goldman Fund · The San Francisco Foundation · Lisa Stone Pritzker Family Fund · Ralph & Marsha Guggenheim Family Foundation · Koret Foundation · The Yelp Foundation · The Albert & Judith Goldberg Foundation · Rmlow Foundation · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ingrid D Tauber Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Ingrid D Tauber Fund Inc?
Find your warmest path to Ingrid D Tauber Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.