Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Lappin Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$173kHealth$40kEducation$8kArts & Culture$4kRecreation & Sports$2kYouth Development$2kHuman Services$1kFood & Nutrition$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$386k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MACHNE ISRAEL INC$7,500
SUSAN G KOMEN FOUNDATION$5,000
PINE ISLAND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$4,725
CHABAD OF CAPE CORAL$4,100
JEWISH MUSEUM & CULTURAL CENTER$3,500
WESTCHESTER REFORM TEMPLE$2,400
PINBALL ASYLUM$1,000
WORD OF LIFE MINISTRIES$1,000
PINE ISLAND FOOD PANTRY$500
MATLACHA CIVIC ASSOCIATION$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FOREVER FAMILIES THROUGH ADOPTION: $100 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$212k · 19 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against -19% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
17

Total granted

$212k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
-19%

Still filing today

32%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2020 · $23k · revenue +29%
  • TP
    The Pine Island Food Pantry Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1k · revenue +18%
  • CC
    CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2017–2020 · $680 · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • SG
    SUSAN G KOMEN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • NF
    NSU FOUNDATION - HONORS COLLEGE
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
2
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
3
Blood Cancer United Inc

Our mission is to cure leukemia, lymphoma, hodgkin's disease and myeloma, and improve the quality of life of patients and their families.

Health
4
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
5
The Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration

Promote and fund research into developing better diagnostic processes, therapies, and cures for frontotemporal degeneration (ftd); provide information, education, support and advocacy to persons diagnosed with ftd, their families and…

Health
6
Brightfocus Foundation

Brightfocus foundation funds exceptional research worldwide to defeat alzheimer's disease, macular degeneration, and glaucoma and provides expert information on these heartbreaking diseases. please refer to schedule o for a complete…

Health
7
Mila's Miracle Foundation

The mission of mila's miracle foundation is to find and fund paths to a cure for batten and other life-threatening neurological disorders. families in this community have been pivotal in raising the necessary funds and awareness. together,…

Health
8
The Foundation Fighting Blindness Inc

To drive the research that will provide preventions, treatments and cures, for people affected by retinitis pigmentosa, macular degeneration, usher syndrome, and the spectrum of retinal degenerative diseases.

Health
9
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
10
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
11
Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Foundation

The lustgarten foundation is the largest private funder of pancreatic cancer research in the world. see schedule o.the lustgarten foundation is boldly leading the way through hope and innovation, turning fear into action through education…

Human Services
12
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crohn's & Colitis Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Greater Pine Island Elks Charitable Trust Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHABAD OF LARCHMONT AND MAMARONECK: $90,190 · OtherCHABAD OF LARCHMONT AND MAMARONECKMACHNE ISRAEL INC: $33,418 · OtherMACHNE ISRAEL INCWestchester Reform Temple: $28,281 · OtherWestchester Reform TempleCHABAD OF CAPE CORAL INC: $9,500 · Other+25 more: $39,095 · Other+25 moreCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $22,500 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS …The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $10,000 · HealthThe Susan G Kome…+2 more: $930 · HealthThe Pine Island Food Pantry Inc: $1,000 · Food & NutritionFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $660 · InternationalTHE JEWISH MUSEUM: $540 · Arts & CultureTHE ACCELERATION PROJECT INC: $350 · Community ImprovementMATLACHA HOOKERS INC: $180 · EducationSTUDENT ADVOCACY INC: $100 · Education
Other$200,484Health$33,430Food & Nutrition$1,000International$660Arts & Culture$540Community Improvement$350Education$280

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Pine Island Food Pantry Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $680 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $660 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM: $540 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ACCELERATION PROJECT INC: $350 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT FUND INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER PINE ISLAND ELKS CHARITABLE TRUST INC: $100 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSTUDENT ADVOCACY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOREVER FAMILIES THROUGH ADOPTION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Pine Island Food Pantry Inc ↗
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds THE ACCELERATION PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds MATLACHA HOOKERS INC ↗
  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER PINE ISLAND ELKS CHARITABLE TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds STUDENT ADVOCACY INC ↗
  • Who funds FOREVER FAMILIES THROUGH ADOPTION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY12.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lappin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lappin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lappin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph