Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Laluyaux Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$545k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$655kInternational$620kFood & Nutrition$490kPhilanthropy$285kReligion$235kArts & Culture$30kAnimals$30kCrime & Legal$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $470k
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY$100,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$100,000
EDGEWOOD$70,000
MOBILE SURGERY INTERNATIONAL$50,000
SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK$50,000
FARMLINK PROJECT$50,000
ST ANTHONY FOUNDATION$50,000
SAVE THE ELEPHANTS USA$30,000
EAT LEARN PLAY FOUNDATION$25,000
CAPE ELEUTHERA FOUNDATION$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GIVE FOUNDATION: $100k → 9%FARMLINK PROJECT: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
PA
CT
CA
UT
VA
LA
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 8 repeat orgs$345k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
9

Total granted

$2.1M
$220k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+19%

Still filing today

63%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $125k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureInternationalCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $550k · revenue +37%
  • CT
    COLLEGE TRACK
    5× · 2020–2024 · $365k · revenue +79%
  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK
    4× · 2022–2025 · $175k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • GF
    GIVE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -102%
  • NI
    NXTHVN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +650%
  • GE
    GLOBAL EMERGENCY RELIEF RECOVERY AND RECONSTRUCTIONgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel

Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…

Community Improvement
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
7
Global Ties Us

Global ties u.s. (global ties) powers individuals, communities, and nations to build trust and advance peace and prosperity through international exchange.

International
8
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
9
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
10
Ie New York College

(see schedule o)

Education
11
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
12
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Multiplying Good Inc; the most unlike its peers is French Talent Usa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
9/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EDGEWOOD: $270,000 · OtherEDGEWOODST ANTHONY FOUNDATION: $235,000 · OtherST ANTHONY FOUNDATIONSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $175,000 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANKMEALS ON WHEELS: $150,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS+5 more: $80,000 · Other+5 moreTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $550,000 · PhilanthropyTIPPING POINT COMMUNITYMULTIPLYING GOOD INC: $160,000 · PhilanthropyMULTIPLYING GOOD INCEAT LEARN PLAY FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyCOLLEGE TRACK: $365,000 · EducationCOLLEGE TRACK+2 more: $20,000 · EducationFARMLINK PROJECT: $165,000 · Human ServicesFARMLINK PRO…GIVE FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesGIVE FOUNDAT…MOBILE SURGERY INTERNATIONAL: $50,000 · HealthCAPE ELEUTHERA FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · InternationalGLOBAL EMERGENCY RELIEF RECOVERY AND RECONSTRUCTION: $20,000 · InternationalSAVE THE ELEPHANTS USA INC: $30,000 · Animals
Other$910,000Philanthropy$735,000Education$385,000Human Services$265,000Health$50,000International$40,000Animals$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $550,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCOLLEGE TRACK: $365,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $175,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFARMLINK PROJECT: $165,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMULTIPLYING GOOD INC: $160,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetGIVE FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAVE THE ELEPHANTS USA INC: $30,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetCAPE ELEUTHERA FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGLOBAL EMERGENCY RELIEF RECOVERY AND RECONSTRUCTION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGANNA WALSKA LOTUSLAND: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNational Court Appointed Special Advocate Association: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWhittier College: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRENCH TALENT USA: $5,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tides FoundationCA12.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tides Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Laluyaux Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Laluyaux Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Nxthvn Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Laluyaux’s filings →

More from the funding graph