Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Kustel Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
37
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$333k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$1.2MHuman Services$807kCivil Rights$763kCommunity Improvement$718kHousing & Shelter$615kPublic Safety & Disaster$423kInternational$415kEducation$393kOther$0
02FY2025 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $320k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $450k
  • $250k+1 grant · $333k
$10,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STINSON BEACH VOLUNTEER FIRE ASSN$333,000
GLIDE FOUNDATION$125,000
CANAL ALLIANCE OF MARIN COUNTY$125,000
HOUSE OF BLUE HOPE$50,000
HOMEWARD BOUND OF MARIN$50,000
SAN FRANCISCO-MARIN FOOD BANK$50,000
THE KITCHEN$50,000
SEEDS OF LEARNING$40,000
PROJECT OPEN HAND$35,000
JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDRENS SERVICE OF MARIN$35,000
ALAMEDA FOOD BANK$25,000
AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION$20,000
CARPENTERS SHELTER$20,000
PLAY MARIN$15,000
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $162k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE: $10k → 11%SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE: $10k → 11%SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE: $10k → 11%SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE: $10k → 11%Solutions for Change: $10k → 11%SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE: $10k → 11%CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $10k → 9%CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $10k → 9%Ceres Community Project: $10k → 9%CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $10k → 9%CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $10k → 9%Ceres Community Project: $10k → 9%CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $10k → 9%Whistlestop: $12k → 8%MULTI-CULTURAL CENTER OF MARIN: $10k → 8%MULTI-CULTURAL CENTER OF MARIN: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NY
OR
NJ
CA
CO
VA
KS
DC
LA
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.3M · 47 repeat orgs$87k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +50% for those funded once.

47 repeat relationships: 34 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
7

Total granted

$7.3M
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+50%

Still filing today

47%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GF
    GLIDE FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $865k · revenue +51%
  • HB
    Homeward Bound of Marin
    7× · 2019–2025 · $435k · revenue +269%
  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK
    7× · 2019–2025 · $365k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • V
    Vivalongraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $12k · revenue +50%
  • CT
    Community Transition Academy
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -45%
  • TC
    THE CHILD AND FAMILY NETWORK CENTERS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +43%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Action Marin

We make it possible for people in marin to achieve well-being by providing the vital services they need. together, we break down the barriers that get in the way of fair and lasting change in service to better outcomes for all.

Human Services
2
Foodwise Community

Foodwise grows thriving communities through the power and joy of local food. We envision a world that nourishes all people, local economies, and the living earth.

—
3
Transportation Alternatives for Marin
Public Benefit
4
Extrafood

Food Rescue - The Organization rescues excess fresh food from Bay Area businesses, schools and non-profits and immediately delivers the food to safety net partners - such as senior housing centers, after-school programs, and homeless…

Food & Nutrition
5
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
6
Center for Domestic Peace

We are Marin's champion in the movement to end domestic violence - working at the intersection of survivors, systems, and community.

Human Services
7
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
8
North Marin Community Services

Our mission is to empower youth, adults and families in our diverse community to achieve well-being, growth and success, and we envision a strong community with opportunities for all. See Schedule O for further details.

Youth Development
9
Agricultural Institute of Marin

The mission of the agricultural institute of marin is to educate, inspire, and connect communities, farmers, and producers in order to create a healthy, earth-friendly, equitable local and regional food and agricultural system.

Environment
10
Canal Alliance

Canal alliance has been the leading service provider and community advocate for marin's extremely low-income immigrant community for 39 years. each year, the organization collaborates with over 60 agencies and engages hundreds of…

Religion
11
Children's Council of San Francisco

By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…

Human Services
12
San Francisco Casa

San Francisco CASA transforms the lives of children and youth traumatized and displaced in the foster care and related systems by providing one consistent, caring volunteer advocate, trained to address each childs needs in the court and…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is 10000 Degrees; the most unlike its peers is Mega Lab. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
20/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CANAL ALLIANCE OF MARIN COUNTY: $760,000 · OtherCANAL ALLIANCE OF MARIN COUNTYSTINSON BEACH VOLUNTEER FIRE ASSN: $666,000 · OtherSTINSON BEACH VOLUNTEER FIRE ASSNThe Kitchen: $520,000 · OtherThe KitchenSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $365,000 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANKSeeds of Learning: $325,000 · OtherSeeds of LearningJewish Family and Childrens Service of Marin: $315,000 · OtherJewish Family and Childrens Service of MarinHOUSE OF BLUE HOPE: $300,000 · OtherHOUSE OF BLUE HOPERodef Sholom Temple: $255,000 · Other+37 more: $1,416,000 · Other+37 moreGLIDE FOUNDATION: $865,000 · ReligionGLIDE FOUNDAT…Homeward Bound of Marin: $435,000 · Housing & ShelterCARPENTER'S SHELTER INC: $110,000 · Housing & ShelterProject Open Hand: $315,000 · Food & NutritionAlameda Emergency Food DBA Alameda Food Bank: $160,000 · Food & Nutrition10000 DEGREES: $275,000 · EducationCommunity Transition Academy: $10,000 · EducationTHE CHILD AND FAMILY NETWORK CENTERS INC: $10,000 · EducationTHE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $70,000 · Human ServicesSOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesThe Multicultural Center of Marin: $20,000 · Human ServicesVivalon: $12,000 · Human ServicesTHE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION: $112,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$4,922,000Religion$865,000Housing & Shelter$545,000Food & Nutrition$475,000Education$295,000Human Services$162,000Public Safety & Disaster$112,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGLIDE FOUNDATION: $865,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetHomeward Bound of Marin: $435,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $365,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSeeds of Learning: $325,000 over 7y, 18% of budgetProject Open Hand: $315,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budget10000 DEGREES: $275,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetAlameda Emergency Food DBA Alameda Food Bank: $160,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION: $112,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCARPENTER'S SHELTER INC: $110,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $70,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetPLAY MARIN: $62,500 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetSOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetOPERATION HOPE INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBoys to Men Mentoring Network Inc: $50,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetWomen Helping All People: $47,500 over 6y, 12% of budgetBridge the Gap College Prep: $45,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CAMPAIGN FOR THE FAIR SENTENCING OF YOUTH: $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetLOUISIANA PAROLE PROJECT INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBOMA FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 3y, 29% of budgetThe Multicultural Center of Marin: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetIMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEARTH University Foundation Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVivalon: $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREADY WILLING & WORKING INC: $10,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetCommunity Transition Academy: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE CHILD AND FAMILY NETWORK CENTERS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOPE HOUSE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEGA LAB: $5,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GLIDE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Homeward Bound of Marin ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Seeds of Learning ↗
  • Who funds Project Open Hand ↗
  • Who funds 10000 DEGREES ↗
  • Who funds Alameda Emergency Food DBA Alameda Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CARPENTER'S SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds PLAY MARIN ↗
  • Who funds SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds Boys to Men Mentoring Network Inc ↗
  • Who funds Women Helping All People ↗
  • Who funds Bridge the Gap College Prep ↗
  • Who funds THE CAMPAIGN FOR THE FAIR SENTENCING OF YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds LOUISIANA PAROLE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds BOMA FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community FoundationCA18.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · Leonard & Beryl Buck Foundation · Hobsonlucas Family Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The San Francisco Foundation · Impactassetsinc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Ayco Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Kustel Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Kustel Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Kustel Fund?

    Find your warmest path to The Kustel Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kustel’s filings →

    More from the funding graph