Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Krause Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$231k
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
16
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$496kInternational$394kEducation$147kPhilanthropy$97kHuman Services$94kYouth Development$90kPublic Safety & Disaster$83kHealth$36kOther$0
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k27 grants · $73k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $48k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
$2,500
Median grant
16
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KING OF KINGS LUTHERAN CHURCH$60,000
MERCY SHIPS$50,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$20,000
MOST MINISTRIES$15,000
THE WALKER FUND$13,000
PROJECT HOPE$6,000
ONLY A CHILD$6,000
HEIFER INTERNATIONAL$5,000
COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL$5,000
THE PREGNANCY CENTER$5,000
CARE$5,000
ZADIE PROJECT$5,000
UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATION INC$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
WORLD VISION$3,050
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $74k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $40k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $20k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
UT
CO
MO
VA
AZ
AR
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 40 repeat orgs$276k to everyone else

40 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
27

Total granted

$1.3M
$262k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+35%

Still filing today

50%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyEducationReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Mercy Ships International
    7× · 2019–2025 · $126k · revenue +136%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    3× · 2021–2025 · $70k · revenue +27%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $64k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • SP
    ST PAUL LUTHERN CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $105k
  • HI
    HAGGAI INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2017 · $32k
  • TW
    The Walker School Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
2
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
3
Gavi Alliance

To save lives and protect people's health by increasing equitable and sustainable use of vaccines.

International
4
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
5
Alight

Alight builds a meaningful life for and with the displaced. not simply addressing basic needs, but building a life filled with joy, dignity, connection, and purpose. we walk with them along their entire journey of displacement and deliver…

International
6
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
7
Intrahealth International Inc

Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.

Health
8
United Way Worldwide

To improve lives by mobilizing caring power of communities around the world to advance common good.

Philanthropy
9
Amnesty International of the Usa Inc

Amnesty international of the usa, inc. is the united states section of amnesty international - a worldwide movement of people who campaign for internationally recognized human rights. (continued on schedule o).organization's mission…

International
10
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
11
Corus International Inc

TO MANAGE AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH, AND RELIEF FOCUSED FAMILY OF ORGANIZATIONS HELPING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES LIFT THEMSELVES OUT OF POVERTY, SUPPORT WELL-BEING OF INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES, AND PROVIDE…

Human Services
12
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Union Mission Corporation; the most unlike its peers is The Animal Welfare Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/38
Grantees still filing
27/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KING OF KINGS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $228,625 · OtherKING OF KINGS LUTHERAN CHURCHST PAUL LUTHERN CHURCH: $105,000 · OtherST PAUL LUTHERN CHURCHMOST MINISTRIES: $90,000 · OtherMOST MINISTRIESHEIFER INTERNATIONAL: $45,000 · OtherHEIFER INTERNATIONALIndividual grant recipient: $45,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE WALKER FUND: $33,000 · OtherHAGGAI INSTITUTE: $32,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY: $30,000 · Other+46 more: $224,850 · Other+46 moreMercy Ships International: $126,000 · InternationalMercy Ships InternationalONLY A CHILD INC: $50,000 · InternationalONLY A CHILD INCCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $45,000 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANC…PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $42,000 · InternationalPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE…Compassion International Incorporated: $35,250 · InternationalCompassion International …WORLD VISION INC: $20,149 · InternationalWORLD VISION INCUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $20,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UN…+1 more: $11,000 · InternationalUNITED WAY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC: $64,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WA…BROWARD COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $64,000 · PhilanthropyBROWARD C…+2 more: $2,450 · PhilanthropyBoys & Girls Clubs of North Georgia Inc: $90,200 · Youth DevelopmentAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $70,000 · Human ServicesATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION: $15,900 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3,000 · Human Services+2 more: $1,100 · Human ServicesUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $35,000 · Public BenefitThe Walker School Inc: $25,000 · EducationGeorgia State University Foundation Inc: $5,500 · EducationNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY: $3,000 · Education
Other$833,475International$349,399Philanthropy$130,450Youth Development$90,200Human Services$90,000Public Benefit$35,000Education$33,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMercy Ships International: $126,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of North Georgia Inc: $90,200 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $70,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC: $64,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBROWARD COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $64,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetONLY A CHILD INC: $50,000 over 8y, 12% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $42,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCompassion International Incorporated: $35,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetThe Walker School Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $20,149 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION: $15,900 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $11,500 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $11,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN ASSOCIATION OF MISSIONARIES AND PILOTS US: $8,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWE RAISE FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGeorgia State University Foundation Inc: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEAGLE RANCH INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA NEUROSCIENCE FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $1,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF SOUTH GEORGIA ISLAND: $1,450 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHEPHERDS CANYON RETREAT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLUTHERAN BIBLE TRANSLATORS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG CANOE ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of North Georgia Inc ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds BROWARD COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ONLY A CHILD INC ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Walker School Inc ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN ASSOCIATION OF MISSIONARIES AND PILOTS US ↗
  • Who funds WE RAISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds Georgia State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE ZADIE PROJECTINC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thrivent Financial for LutheransMN13.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Krause Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Krause Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 27%
  • United Way of Broward County Inc: 27% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Krause Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Krause Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Krause Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph