Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Kranz Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$209k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$415kHuman Services$215kArts & Culture$125kEmployment$94kAnimals$20kReligion$18kHousing & Shelter$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $64k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $135k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$621k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STEWARDS CARING PLACE$75,000
HEIGHTS ARTS$60,000
KABOOM COLLECTIVE$31,500
GRACE HOUSE$12,500
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION$10,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF SUMMIT COUNTY$10,000
WESTERN RESERVE PLAYHOUSE$5,000
INMOTION$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $50k → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $50k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$852k · 7 repeat orgs$90k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
5

Total granted

$852k
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-8%
+16%

Still filing today

57%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureAnimalsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    STEWART'S CARING PLACE INC AND SUBSIDIARY
    6× · 2019–2024 · $413k · revenue -54%
  • HA
    HEIGHTS ARTS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $120k
  • LD
    LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND
    2× · 2017–2018 · $100k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • SH
    SHORE HAVEN LUTHERN CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • MP
    MENORAH PARK FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -81%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Cleveland Animal Protective League

The cleveland animal protective league's (apl) mission is to foster compassion and end animal suffering. the apl provides shelter, care, and medical treatment to animals that have lost their homes and/or suffered cruelty or neglect. it…

Animals
2
Columbus Zoological Park Association

Empowering people. saving wildlife.

Animals
3
Humane Pennsylvania Foundation

To encourage and motivate the making of gifts and donations by deed, will, or otherwise, for the advancement, promotion, extension, and maintenance of the various causes and objectives fostered by the humane pennsylvania.

Animals
4
Humane Pennsylvania

Humane pennsylvania empowers the people in our communities to increase their capacity to care for animals so that all animals are healthy, safe, and treated humanely.

Animals
5
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
6
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
7
Akron Zoological Park

We connect your life to wildlife while inspiring lifelong learning and conservation action.

Animals
8
Women's Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc

As america's first animal shelter, founded in 1869, women's humane society dba women's animal center (wac), assists people in the community, saves the lives of animals, and improves the health of pets through its shelter and adoptions…

Animals
9
Animal Charity of Ohio Inc

The society is dedicated to promoting care for all animals. we strive to never turn away sick or injured. our goal is to bring about a world where humane societies are no longer necessary.

Animals
10
Ohio Disability Rights Law & Policy Center Inc

To advocate for an equitable ohio for people with disabilities.

Civil Rights
11
Summit Assistance Dogs

Summit assistance dogs is a nonprofit organization that creates life-changing partnerships by providing highly-trained mobility assistance dogs for people living with disabilities.

Human Services
12
Diabetes Partnership of Cleveland

Diabetes partnership of cleveland works to provide relevant and sustainable programming, education, resources and supplies to the community in northeast ohio affected by diabetes.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stewart's Caring Place Inc and Subsidiary and the most unlike its peers is Western Reserve Playhouse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

STEWART'S CARING PLACE INC AND SUBSIDIARY — $412,825 · HealthSTEWART'S CARING PLACE INC AND SUBSIDIARY+3 more — $15,000 · HealthHEIGHTS ARTS — $120,000 · OtherHEIGHTS ARTSMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION — $80,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGRACE HOUSE — $25,000 · OtherGRACE HOUSESHORE HAVEN LUTHERN CHURCH — $15,000 · Other+2 more — $5,000 · OtherLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND — $100,000 · Human ServicesLEADER DOGS …Kaboom Collective — $94,000 · Arts & CultureKaboom Coll…Western Reserve Playhouse — $5,000 · Arts & CultureHUMANE SOCIETY OF SUMMIT COUNTY — $20,000 · Animals
Health$427,825Other$295,000Human Services$100,000Arts & Culture$99,000Animals$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSTEWART'S CARING PLACE INC AND SUBSIDIARY — $412,825 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND — $100,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetKaboom Collective — $94,000 over 3y, 28% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SUMMIT COUNTY — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMENORAH PARK FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWestern Reserve Playhouse — $5,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetHOPE FARM INC — $2,500 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetINMOTION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STEWART'S CARING PLACE INC AND SUBSIDIARY
  • Who funds LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND
  • Who funds Kaboom Collective
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF SUMMIT COUNTY
  • Who funds MENORAH PARK FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Western Reserve Playhouse
  • Who funds HOPE FARM INC
  • Who funds INMOTION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Akron Community FoundationOH15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Akron Community Foundation · Jean Harry and Brenda Fuchs Family Family Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Kranz Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Kranz Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Kranz Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph