Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Knisely Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$351k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$522kHealth$422kHuman Services$340kYouth Development$170kEducation$143kHousing & Shelter$104kArts & Culture$84kEmployment$80kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $57k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $242k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
$10,070
Median grant
9
States reached
$5.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NOURISH$51,500
IMAGO DEI SCHOOL$20,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
ELDER ALLIANCE UNITED WAY$15,000
CROSSROADS - FALLEN FRUIT PROJECT$15,000
SETON HOUSE$15,000
FOOD BANK OF WYOMING$15,000
NEW WOMEN NEW YORKER$15,000
SOS OUTREACH$15,000
THE DRAWING STUDIO$15,000
MOBILE MEALS OF WENATCHEE$15,000
WIKITONGUES INC$14,850
BLUE LOTUS ARTIST COLLECTIVE$12,000
CHELAN DOUGLAS CASA$10,070
FOOD SHARE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $245k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TUCSON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $30k → 15%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $10k → 14%NEW WOMEN NEW YORKER: $15k → 17%DENVER RESCUE MISSION: $15k → 12%NORTHWEST BATTLE BUDDIES: $10k → 9%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $10k → 14%NEW WOMEN NEW YORKER: $15k → 17%DENVER RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 12%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $10k → 14%NEW WOMEN NEW YORKER: $15k → 17%LARAMIE SOUP KITCHEN: $5k → 17%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $10k → 14%NEW WOMEN NEW YORKER: $15k → 17%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $10k → 14%NEW WOMEN NEW YORKER: $15k → 17%CROSSROADS MISSION: $15k → 15%NEW WOMEN NEW YORKER: $10k → 17%NEW WOMEN NEW YORKER: $10k → 17%CROSSROADS MISSION: $10k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
OR
WY
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 43 repeat orgs$283k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
24

Total granted

$2.2M
$198k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+11%

Still filing today

60%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $84k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsHealthEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • N
    NOURISH
    9× · 2017–2025 · $257k · revenue +68% · 42% of their budget
  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES
    7× · 2018–2025 · $136k · revenue +68%
  • NW
    NEW WOMEN NEW YORKERS INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $95k · revenue ×12

Funded once

  • TJ
    TUCSON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue +56%
  • KP
    KING'S PORTION COMMUNITY PANTRY
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • CC
    CONVERSE COUNTY COALITION AGAINST VIOLENCE
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
2
Ymca of Southern Arizona

Ymca of southern arizona is dedicated to improving the quality of human life and helping all people realize their fullest potential through the development of spirit, mind and body. we are a powerful association of men, women and children,…

Human Services
3
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
4
Umom New Day Centers Inc

To end family homelessness by restoring hope and rebuilding lives, so no child will ever have to sleep on the streets.

Housing & Shelter
5
Tucson Centers for Women & Children Inc Dba Emerge Center Against Domestic Abuse

Emerge center against domestic abuse provides the opportunity to create, sustain, and celebrate a life free from abuse.

Human Services
6
Lutheran Social Services of the Southwest

We stabilize people during crisis and transition, build a foundation where people can thrive, and preserve dignity and respect for the most vulnerable.

Religion
7
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
8
Tucson Family Food Project Inc

The mission of the tucson family food project is to provide meals for children who are struggling with food insecurity, while teaching them how to cook food for themselves in their own homes.

Food & Nutrition
9
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
10
Terros Inc

Terros health is a whole health, whole person integrated care provider delivering physical health care with specialization in substance use recovery, mental health, prevention, wellness and family services. terros health seeks to inspire…

Unclassified
11
Tempe Community Action Agency Inc

TCAA's mission is to eliminate poverty and advance equitable communities. This mission is achieved through the delivery of comprehensive human services programs designed to improve housing stability, increase food security, improve health…

Community Improvement
12
Foster 360

Foster360 equips former clients of the foster care system to break the cycle of homelessness and abuse.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Northern California; the most unlike its peers is The Healing Journey Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/43
Grantees still filing
32/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MOBILE MEALS OF WENATCHEE: $95,000 · OtherMOBILE MEALS OF WENATCHEEOur Family Services Inc: $94,000 · OtherOur Family Services IncIMAGO DEI SCHOOL: $72,500 · OtherIMAGO DEI SCHOOLOREGON FOOD BANK: $60,000 · OtherOREGON FOOD BANKCHELAN DOUGLAS CASA: $57,980 · OtherDOERNBECHER CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $47,500 · OtherTUCSON COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $38,135 · OtherBoys & Girls Club of Douglas: $65,000 · OtherBoys & Girls Club of DouglasAmberlys Place: $45,000 · Other+38 more: $547,387 · Other+38 moreNOURISH: $256,700 · HealthNOURISHCONVERSE HOPE CENTER: $78,000 · HealthCONVERSE HOPE CENTERTMC HEALTH FOUNDATION: $74,300 · HealthTMC HEALTH FOUNDATIO…Tucson Medical Center: $31,500 · HealthTucson Medical Cente…FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $136,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF …The Healing Journey Inc: $72,000 · Food & NutritionThe Healing J…GORGE GROWN FOOD NETWORK: $43,000 · Food & NutritionGORGE GROWN F…YUMA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $30,000 · Food & NutritionYUMA COMMUNIT…FOOD SHARE INC: $17,500 · Food & NutritionFOOD SHARE IN…NEW WOMEN NEW YORKERS INC: $95,000 · Human ServicesNEW WOMEN NE…DENVER RESCUE MISSION: $55,000 · Human ServicesDENVER RESCU…International Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America: $50,000 · Human ServicesInternationa…TUCSON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesTUCSON JEWIS…CROSSROADS MISSION: $25,000 · Human ServicesCROSSROADS M…NORTHWEST BATTLE BUDDIES: $9,770 · Human Services+2 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesEL RIO FOUNDATION INC: $91,850 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc: $38,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $7,000 · PhilanthropyGLOBAL CAMPS AFRICA INC: $44,500 · Recreation & SportsTUCSON COMMUNITY TENNIS PROGRAM: $42,885 · Recreation & SportsSOS OUTREACH: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsTAMARACK WELLNESS CENTER: $8,750 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $3,000 · Recreation & SportsWIKITONGUES INC: $51,650 · EducationLITERACY CONNECTS: $49,000 · EducationOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $8,000 · Education
Other$1,122,502Health$440,500Food & Nutrition$298,500Human Services$274,770Philanthropy$136,850Recreation & Sports$114,135Education$108,650

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNOURISH: $256,700 over 9y, 42% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $136,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNEW WOMEN NEW YORKERS INC: $95,000 over 7y, 19% of budgetOur Family Services Inc: $94,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetEL RIO FOUNDATION INC: $91,850 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetCONVERSE HOPE CENTER: $78,000 over 6y, 5.1% of budgetTMC HEALTH FOUNDATION: $74,300 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetThe Healing Journey Inc: $72,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Douglas: $65,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER RESCUE MISSION: $55,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWIKITONGUES INC: $51,650 over 5y, 6.8% of budgetInternational Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLITERACY CONNECTS: $49,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetAmberlys Place: $45,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetGLOBAL CAMPS AFRICA INC: $44,500 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetGORGE GROWN FOOD NETWORK: $43,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetTUCSON COMMUNITY TENNIS PROGRAM: $42,885 over 8y, 13% of budgetUnited Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc: $38,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTucson Medical Center: $31,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASA DE LOS NINOS: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTUCSON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE DRAWING STUDIO INC: $27,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetFOODSHARE INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSROADS MISSION: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMOTHER SETON HOUSING INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetFOOD SHARE INC: $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOS OUTREACH: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 312 - GREATER ST LOUIS AREA COUNCIL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPSC PARTNERS SEEKING A CURE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSETON HALL UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST BATTLE BUDDIES: $9,770 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTAMARACK WELLNESS CENTER: $8,750 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLARAMIE INTERFAITH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLARAMIE SOUP KITCHEN: $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NOURISH ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds NEW WOMEN NEW YORKERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Our Family Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds EL RIO FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CONVERSE HOPE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TMC HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Healing Journey Inc ↗
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Club of Douglas ↗
  • Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds DENVER RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds WIKITONGUES INC ↗
  • Who funds International Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY CONNECTS ↗
  • Who funds Amberlys Place ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL CAMPS AFRICA INC ↗
  • Who funds GORGE GROWN FOOD NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds TUCSON COMMUNITY TENNIS PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc ↗
  • Who funds Tucson Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds CASA DE LOS NINOS ↗
  • Who funds YUMA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds TUCSON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DRAWING STUDIO INC ↗
  • Who funds FOODSHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS MISSION ↗
  • Who funds MOTHER SETON HOUSING INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southern ArizonaAZ25.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · Arizona Community Foundation · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · Margaret E Mooney Foundation · Marshall Foundation · Angel Charity for Children Inc · Donald Pitt Family Foundation · The David and Lura Lovell · Jewish Community Foundation of Southern Arizona · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · Wyoming Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Knisely Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Knisely Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
  • Oregon Health & Science University Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • Seton Hall University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Knisely Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Knisely Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Knisely Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph