Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Kimmel Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$2.6M
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$13MArts & Culture$1.3MScience & Tech$1.2MHealth$850kHuman Services$600kEducation$395kEnvironment$350kRecreation & Sports$130kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k6 grants · $520k
  • $250k+3 grants · $3.6M
$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YESHIVA MESIVTA MENACHEM$2,600,000
CONGREGATION YAD SHAUL$600,000
AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE$400,000
CHABAD OF BUSHWICK$100,000
CONTEMPORARY ARTS CENTER$100,000
MANHATTAN HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS$100,000
PERFECT EARTH PROJECT$100,000
MUSEUM OF MODERN ART$70,000
MOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $500k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BRONX WORKS INCORPORATED: $100k → 28%MOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER: $50k → 17%MOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER: $50k → 17%MOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER: $100k → 17%MOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER: $50k → 17%MOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER: $50k → 17%MOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER: $50k → 17%MOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$17M · 17 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +71% since the first grant, against +58% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
16

Total granted

$17M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+58%

Still filing today

41%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationInternationalHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +71%
  • ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
    2× · 2021–2023 · $475k · revenue +22%
  • PE
    PERFECT EARTH PROJECT INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $350k · revenue +164%

Funded once

  • MS
    MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEMS - UGANDA PROJECT
    one grant, 2018 · $375k
  • M
    MOMA
    one grant, 2020 · $140k
  • SF
    SAMUEL FIELD YM AND YMCA
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
2
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
3
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
4
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
5
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
6
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
7
National September 11 Memorial and Museum At the World Trade Center

The national september 11 memorial & museum at the world trade center bears solemn witness to the terrorist attacks of september 11, 2001, and february 26, 1993. located at a site made sacred through loss, the memorial & museum remembers…

Arts & Culture
8
Solomon R Guggenheim Foundation

Committed to innovation, the solomon r. guggenheim foundation (the "foundation") collects, (continued on schedule o)

Arts & Culture
9
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
10
The Young Men's and Young Women's Hebrew Association

For over 150 years, the 92nd street y, new york has been serving its communities and the larger world by bringing people together (continued on schedule o)and providing exceptional, groundbreaking programs in the performing and visual…

Religion
11
Philadelphia Museum of Art

The philadelphia museum of art - in partnership with the city, the region, and art museums around the globe - seeks to preserve, enhance, interpret, and extend the reach of its great collection in particular, and the visual arts in…

Arts & Culture
12
New York Historical Society

The founding mission of the new-york historical society ("the new york historical "tnyh") is to collect, preserve, and interpret, for the broadest possible public, material relevant to the history of the united states in general and of new…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Icahn School of Medicine At Mount Sinai; the most unlike its peers is Yesod Yosef Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YESHIVA MESIVTA MENACHEM: $8,525,000 · OtherYESHIVA MESIVTA MENACHEMCHABAD OF BUSHWICK INC: $2,115,000 · OtherCHABAD OF BUSHWICK INCCONGREGATION YAD SHAUL: $1,710,000 · OtherCONGREGATION YAD SHAUL+18 more: $2,403,000 · Other+18 moreAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC: $1,200,000 · InternationalAMERICAN …PERFECT EARTH PROJECT INC: $350,000 · InternationalPERFECT E…ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $475,000 · EducationNew York University: $40,000 · EducationMOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $400,000 · Human ServicesBRONXWORKS INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesMuseum of Modern Art: $420,000 · Arts & CultureYESOD YOSEF INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $20,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $6,400 · Arts & CultureThe Bridge Golf Foundation: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyFRESH AIR FUND: $30,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$14,753,000International$1,550,000Education$515,000Human Services$500,000Arts & Culture$496,400Youth Development$100,000Philanthropy$50,000Recreation & Sports$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC: $1,200,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $475,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $420,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $400,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetPERFECT EARTH PROJECT INC: $350,000 over 4y, 18% of budgetBRONXWORKS INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Bridge Golf Foundation: $100,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetYESOD YOSEF INC: $50,000 over 1y, 47% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK YANKEES FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $6,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
  • Who funds Museum of Modern Art ↗
  • Who funds MOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PERFECT EARTH PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds BRONXWORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Bridge Golf Foundation ↗
  • Who funds YESOD YOSEF INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK YANKEES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRESH AIR FUND ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY16.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Ojc Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Kimmel Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Kimmel Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Kimmel Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Kimmel Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kimmel Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph