Skip to content
The Kimball International - Habig Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Kimball International - Habig Foundation Inc

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$706k
Granted FY2023
12
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$633k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$702kEducation$361kPublic Benefit$45kHealth$42kCommunity Improvement$39kEnvironment$30kArts & Culture$22kHuman Services$13kOther$0
02FY2023 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k10 grants · $17k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $56k
  • $250k+1 grant · $633k
$1,875
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HNI CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$633,259
HNI CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$56,158
MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$4,800
DUBOIS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,500
ROTARY CLUB OF DUBOIS COUNTY$2,500
MENTORS FOR YOUTH$1,875
DUBOIS COUNTY LEADERSHIP ACADEMY$1,250
DUBOIS RURITAN CLUB$1,000
NORTH SPENCER SCHOOL CORP$800
FOREST PARK SCHOOL ATHLETICS$675
ST JOHN BOSCO YOUTH MINISTRY$605
INDIANA BASEBALL HALL OF FAME$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KNOTS OF LOVE: $1k → 10%SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 11%RALLY POINT EVENTS: $5k → 15%RALLY POINT EVENTS: $1k → 15%TRI COUNTY YMCA: $5k → 8%TRI COUNTY YMCA: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
PA
CT
CA
MO
KY
VA
MD
TN
DC
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

29%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$370k · 48 repeat orgs$907k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

48 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2023, 43 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

48
137

Total granted

$370k
$213k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+18%

Still filing today

25%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $694k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • American Forests
    2× · 2021–2022 · $30k · revenue +122%
  • MH
    MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2019–2023 · $7k · revenue +49%
  • RP
    RALLY POINT EVENTS INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $6k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • KI
    KIDS IN NEED FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $12k · revenue -63%
  • HU
    HAMPTON UNIVERSITY PRES HARVEY RETI
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • DC
    DUBOIS COUNTY COMM FDN
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana University Health North Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
2
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
3
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
4
Indiana University Health Ball Memorial Physicians Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
5
Indiana University Health Ball Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc

Benefit, perform, and carry out the charitable, educational, and other exempt purposes of indiana university health ball memorial hospital, inc. ("iu health ball memorial hospital") and related organizations, and to support activities…

—
6
Indiana University Health White Memorial Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
7
Indiana University Health Jay Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
8
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
9
Indiana University Health Arnett Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
10
Indiana University Health Bloomington Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
11
Indiana University Health Blackford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
12
Penn Highlands Healthcare Inc

Our community-based and controlled health care system exists to improve regional access to a wide array of premier primary care and advanced health services while supporting a reverence for life and the worth and dignity of each individual.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Southridge High School Post Prom. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 191 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
27/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HNI Charitable Foundation: $689,417 · OtherHNI Charitable FoundationJASPER-DUBOIS COUNTY CONTRACTUAL PUBLIC LIBRARY: $150,000 · OtherJASPER-DUBOIS COUNTY CONTRACTUAL PUBLIC LIBRARY+167 more: $349,363 · Other+167 moreAmerican Forests: $29,500 · EnvironmentAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $10,500 · HealthMEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $6,800 · HealthTHE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL: $760 · Health+8 more: $3,160 · HealthKIDS IN NEED FOUNDATION: $12,150 · EducationIndiana University Foundation: $5,000 · EducationRALLY POINT EVENTS INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesTri-County Young Mens Christian Association: $5,500 · Human ServicesKnots of Love Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesSBCS CORPORATION: $1,000 · Human ServicesDUBOIS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $12,500 · PhilanthropyDC MULTISPORT INC: $5,860 · Recreation & SportsCOMMUNITY OF CELESTINE INC: $500 · Recreation & SportsJasper Football Booster Club Inc: $300 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,188,780Environment$29,500Health$21,220Education$17,150Human Services$13,500Philanthropy$12,500Recreation & Sports$6,660

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHNI Charitable Foundation: $689,417 over 1y, 70% of budgetAmerican Forests: $29,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDUBOIS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKIDS IN NEED FOUNDATION: $12,150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $10,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $6,800 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRALLY POINT EVENTS INC: $6,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetDC MULTISPORT INC: $5,860 over 3y, 30% of budgetTri-County Young Mens Christian Association: $5,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetIndiana University Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJasper Strassenfest Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetYORK COUNTY FOOD BANK: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUBOIS COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,562 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKnots of Love Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSBCS CORPORATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRISIS CONNECTION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetANDERSON WOODS INC: $800 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL: $760 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHRIDGE HIGH SCHOOL POST PROM: $750 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetINDIANA BASEBALL HALL OF FAME INC: $750 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetDALE FALL FESTIVAL INC: $700 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetNEXT ACT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY OF CELESTINE INC: $500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPHOEBE PUTNEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC: $380 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIndiana University Health Inc: $380 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUPMC PINNACLE LANCASTER: $380 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEXETER HOSPITAL INC: $380 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor Scott & White Health: $380 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPiedmont Hospital Inc: $380 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWELLSTAR HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $380 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJasper Football Booster Club Inc: $300 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL CHILD SAFETY COUNCIL: $275 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJASPER BAND PARENTS INC: $240 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HNI Charitable Foundation ↗
  • Who funds American Forests ↗
  • Who funds DUBOIS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KIDS IN NEED FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RALLY POINT EVENTS INC ↗
  • Who funds DC MULTISPORT INC ↗
  • Who funds Tri-County Young Mens Christian Association ↗
  • Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Jasper Strassenfest Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dubois County Communi…Thomas W Seger and Cy…Welborn Baptist Found…Maps Family Foundatio…Edwin C Tretter Found…Ruxer Foundation IncGerman American Found…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…
Dubois County Community FoundationIN32.5× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dubois County Community Foundation · Thomas W Seger and Cynthia J Seger Family Foundation Inc · Welborn Baptist Foundation Inc · Maps Family Foundation Inc · Edwin C Tretter Foundation Inc · Ruxer Foundation Inc · German American Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Kimball International - Habig Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Kimball International - Habig Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc: 11% of income from government
  • The Johns Hopkins Hospital: 0% of income from government
  • Exeter Hospital Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Kimball International - Habig Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Kimball International - Habig Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 191 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kimball International - Habig’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home