· Private foundation
German American Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DUBOIS COUNTY 4H COUNCIL | $4,731 |
| OPERATION MIND BODY AND SOUL CORP | $4,731 |
| SOUTHERN INDIANA RESOURCE SOLUTIONS INC | $4,730 |
| INDIANA SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC | $4,730 |
| DUBOIS COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY | $4,730 |
| CELESTINE PARK | $4,730 |
| HEALING HEARTS AND HOOVES | $4,730 |
| DUBOIS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $4,730 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +65% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DCDUBOIS COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY3× · 2017–2025 · $15k · revenue +192%
- CFCommunity Food Bank3× · 2018–2021 · $12k · revenue +23%
- CCCRISIS CONNECTION INC2× · 2018–2021 · $10k · revenue +29%
Funded once
- MTMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $5k
- FRFREEDOM REINS THERAPEUTIC RIDING CEone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +10%
- SOSurvivors of Suicideone grant, 2022 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Community and area fire protection, render assistance at accident sites and ambulance calls. provide building space for community activities.
Provide volunteer fire protection to the cummunity of dunkirk, indiana.
Volunteer Fire and Rescue Service Protect Property and Save Lives
Fire, rescue and ems services
To provide fire protection and rescue services to the residences and business in german township, bartholomew county, indiana
Food and nonfood assistance to individuals
Too provide high quality emergency services 24/7.
Provide volunteer fire and ems services to property owners in the hope, in and surrounding area
Provide Fire Prevention & Protection Services
Volunteer fire department
Fire fighting and first responder services for surrounding community.
Providing fire protection to the citizens of new durham township, jackson township, and town of westville, located in laporte/porter counties, indiana. also promotion of fire prevention and safety.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dubois Volunteer Fire Depart Inc and the most unlike its peers is Locking Arms for Suicide Awareness Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 14% of your grantees by number, and just 12% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DUBOIS COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DUBOIS COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Community Food Bank ↗
- Who funds CRISIS CONNECTION INC ↗
- Who funds MENTORS FOR YOUTH OF DUBOIS COUNTY ↗
- Who funds INDIANA SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM REINS THERAPEUTIC RIDING CE ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DUBOIS COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Borrowed Hearts Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds DUBOIS COUNTY LEUKEMIA ASSOC INC ↗
- Who funds DUBOIS-PIKE-WARRICK EOC INC D/B/A TRI-CAP ↗
- Who funds MATRIX LIFELINE OF DUBOIS COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Southwest Indiana Child Advocacy Center Coalition ↗
- Who funds DISTRICT OF JASPER OF THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL INC ↗
- Who funds HONOR FLIGHT OF SOUTHERN INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds LOCKING ARMS FOR SUICIDE AWARENESS INC ↗
- Who funds VINCENNES UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DUBOIS COUNTY 4-H COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN INDIANA RESOURCE SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds CELESTINE PARK INC ↗
- Who funds DOVE RECOVERY HOUSE FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds BACKPACK BUDDIES OF INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds BIRDSEYE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES OF H'BURG INC ↗
- Who funds HUNTINGBURG VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT INC ↗
- Who funds ST ANTHONY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
- Who funds ST HENRY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Dubois County Community Foundation · Tc Energy Foundation · Thomas L Habig Foundation Inc · The Smithville Charitable Foundation Inc · Community Foundation Alliance Inc · Jjc Charitable Trust · C A Stenftenagel Family Foundation · Thomas W Seger and Cynthia J Seger Family Foundation Inc · TLGC Foundation · The Kimball International - Habig Foundation Inc · Welborn Baptist Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization German American Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to German American Foundation?
Find your warmest path to German American Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.