Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Kessler Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$324k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$338kReligion$300kYouth Development$300kHuman Services$80kEducation$67k
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $24k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$1,200
Median grant
2
States reached
$754k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SETPATH$300,000
Individual grant recipient$3,302
CHOICE HUMANITARIAN$2,413
CORNER CANYON HIGH SCHOOL$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,623
AGOSTINA NOELIA PAGANO ANDRADA$1,605
Individual grant recipient$1,535
KATHERINE JESUS DEBSIE SERRANO$1,500
NATALIA YAMILE CARDENAS CARATAR$1,474
MIRYAM MERCEDES MALDONADO RODRIGUEZ$1,218
GIOSMARA KATHERINE CANARTE ABAD$1,200
Individual grant recipient$1,109
NORMA CONSTANZA MARTIN VARGAS$1,100
ANGEE CAROLINA BARBOSA GONZALEZ$1,029
MARIA CAROLINA TOVAR ANEZ$929
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 83% of grant dollars ($902k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 17% that went abroad ($185k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%STAND WITH UKRAINE: $25k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
OR
CA
UT
CO
MD
NC
DC
AL
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 17% of all-years giving ($185k)

3 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Ecuador$144k · 16 grants
Colombia$34k · 29 grants
Argentina$7k · 4 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

14%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$148k · 4 repeat orgs$938k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +586795% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
51

Total granted

$148k
$616k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+586795%
+24%

Still filing today

50%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $323k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalYouth DevelopmentReligionPublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RISE AGAINST HUNGER INC
    5× · 2018–2023 · $66k · revenue +162%
  • AF
    ACADEMY FOUNDATION FOR THE FUTURE
    2× · 2019–2021 · $65k · revenue ×5,869
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2019–2020 · $14k

Funded once

  • TI
    THE INTERPRETER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $300k · revenue -1%
  • FS
    FOUNDATION SERVING PEOPLE SAG
    one grant, 2021 · $72k
  • SS
    SIXTO STALIN TUSTON TORRES
    one grant, 2020 · $53k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ummah Relief International

Ummah relief international is a dedicated grassroots relief organization providing humanitarian services to bring help and hope to thousands of victims of natural and human disasters with quick and targeted action.

International
2
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
3
United States Association for Unhcr

USA for UNHCR protects and supports refugees by mobilizing resources, elevating awareness, and driving action through a network of engaged supporters.

International
4
Sustainable Harvest International

Working together to create a just and sustainable world through transformative farmer training that nourishes communities and the Earth.

Environment
5
Ukrainian Refugee Foundation

URF is a 501(c)(30 nonprofit based in California. We receive funds through private donations and spend them on several programs, providing aid, rescue, and relief for Ukrainian war victims in the form of cash donations for food, shelter,…

Public Safety & Disaster
6
The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

International
7
Crisis Response International

To resource, train, and mobilize volunteers, churches,& other organizations to respond to disasters in the united states & world-wide

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Unitus Labs

Unitus Labs provides consulting support loans grants and investments to partner organizations who are implementing innovative market-based approaches to reducing global poverty with potential for very large scale impact.

International
9
Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft

The quincy institute promotes ideas that move u.s. foreign policy away from endless war and toward vigorous diplomacy in the pursuit of international peace. qi's staff and non-resident experts expose the costs and consequences of…

Community Improvement
10
Us Digital Response

U.s. digital response is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that helps governments, nonprofits, and public entities respond quickly to critical public needs. the organization serves the public by leveraging a network of pro bono…

Public Safety & Disaster
11
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
12
Union Foundation Us

Rigorous biblical and accessible education, training and resources for churches worldwide.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fisher House Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Academy Foundation for the Future. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FOUNDATION SERVING PEOPLE SAG: $72,070 · OtherFOUNDATION SERVING PEOPLE SAGACADEMY FOUNDATION FOR THE FUTURE: $65,400 · OtherACADEMY FOUNDATION FOR THE FUTURESIXTO STALIN TUSTON TORRES: $52,500 · OtherSIXTO STALIN TUSTON TORRESIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $13,985 · Other+62 more: $117,872 · Other+62 moreSETPATH: $300,000 · Youth DevelopmentSETPATHTHE INTERPRETER FOUNDATION: $300,000 · ReligionTHE INTERPRETER FOUNDATIONRISE AGAINST HUNGER INC: $65,897 · InternationalINTERWEAVE SOLUTIONS: $9,416 · International+1 more: $2,413 · InternationalStand With Ukraine Inc dba To Ukraine With Love: $25,000 · Human ServicesTEAM RUBICON INC: $10,101 · Public Safety & DisasterUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $1,600 · Public Benefit
Other$371,827Youth Development$300,000Religion$300,000International$77,726Human Services$25,000Public Safety & Disaster$10,101Public Benefit$1,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSETPATH: $300,000 over 1y, 38% of budgetTHE INTERPRETER FOUNDATION: $300,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetRISE AGAINST HUNGER INC: $65,897 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetACADEMY FOUNDATION FOR THE FUTURE: $65,400 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetStand With Ukraine Inc dba To Ukraine With Love: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $10,101 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERWEAVE SOLUTIONS: $9,416 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $6,727 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR HUMANITARIAN OUTREACH AND INTERCULTURAL EXCHANGE: $2,413 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $1,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SETPATH ↗
  • Who funds THE INTERPRETER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RISE AGAINST HUNGER INC ↗
  • Who funds ACADEMY FOUNDATION FOR THE FUTURE ↗
  • Who funds Stand With Ukraine Inc dba To Ukraine With Love ↗
  • Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERWEAVE SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR HUMANITARIAN OUTREACH AND INTERCULTURAL EXCHANGE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

University ImpactUT13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: University Impact · The Community Foundation of Utah · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Kessler Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Kessler Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Kessler Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Kessler Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kessler Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph