Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Kenyon Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$46kHealth$16kReligion$14kHuman Services$12kCivil Rights$10kFood & Nutrition$2kYouth Development$400Recreation & Sports$300Other$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,250
Median grant
10
States reached
$362k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Medshare - Ukranian Relief$3,000
Planned Parenthood National$2,500
International Rescue Committee$2,500
Global Fund for Children$1,500
Central Texas Food Bank$1,500
Turning Point of Lehigh Valley$1,500
Water for the People$1,250
ZOE$1,250
Women for Women$1,250
Shelter Box$1,250
Raices$1,250
2nd Harvest Food Bank$875
Crisis Assistance Ministry$625
Children of Grace$504
Crosby Fund for Haitian Education$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Turning Point of Lehigh Valley: $2k → 11%Shelter Box: $1k → 10%TURNING POINT OF LEHEIGH VALLEY: $1k → 11%SHELTERBOX: $1k → 10%Crisis Assistance Ministry: $625 → 10%TURNING POINT OF LEHEIGH VALLEY: $700 → 11%Shelter Box: $1k → 10%TURNING POINT OF LEHEIGH VALLEY: $700 → 11%SHELTERBOX: $1k → 10%TURNING POINT OF LEHEIGH VALLEY: $700 → 11%SHELTERBOX: $1k → 10%TURNING POINT OF LEHEIGH VALLEY: $700 → 11%SHELTERBOX: $1k → 10%TURNING POINT OF LEHEIGH VALLEY: $500 → 11%SHELTERBOX: $1k → 10%SHELTERBOX: $1k → 10%BRIGHT BLESSINGS: $200 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
PA
CT
CA
CO
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$116k · 19 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
9

Total granted

$116k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+2%

Still filing today

53%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesCivil RightsFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SU
    SHELTERBOX USA INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $9k · revenue +123%
  • WF
    WATER FOR PEOPLE
    7× · 2017–2023 · $8k · revenue +42%
  • GF
    GLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN
    6× · 2020–2025 · $8k · revenue +231%

Funded once

  • HR
    Human Rights Campaign Fnd
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • PP
    Planned Parenthood of Texas
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • Transgender Law Center
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue -15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Crisis Aid Inc

Provide aid to people in need worldwide

Human Services
2
Aid for Starving Children

Aid For Starving Children provides assistance around the world to children and their families by providing food, shelter, clean water, financial assistance, education, and emergency relief to victims of famine, natural disasters, and war.

International
3
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
4
MedGlobal Inc

MedGlobal is a humanitarian non-governmental organization working to serve vulnerable communities around the world by providing innovative, free, and sustainable healthcare. Our health services support refugees, displaced persons, and…

Health
5
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
6
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
7
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
8
Choose Love Inc

Support refugees, asylum seekers and those who have been internally displaced, primarily through an international, cross-sector network of predominantly locally-led projects; advocate for the rights of these persons through promoting…

Human Services
9
Alight

Alight builds a meaningful life for and with the displaced. not simply addressing basic needs, but building a life filled with joy, dignity, connection, and purpose. we walk with them along their entire journey of displacement and deliver…

International
10
Solar Cookers International

The mission of Solar Cookers International is to improve human health, economic well-being, womens empowerment, and the environment by promoting climate-friendly solar cooking for vulnerable populations worldwide.

Environment
11
Strategic Global Response

Strategic Global Response effectively and efficiently delivers life-saving care to people affected by humanitarian crises, in the most challenging situations on earth

Human Services
12
Lifting Hands International

We provide aid to refugees, both at home and abroad. Simply humanitarian.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Global Fund for Children; the most unlike its peers is It Starts With Soccer. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $12,350 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODWOMEN FOR WOMEN: $10,250 · OtherWOMEN FOR WOMENPROVIDENCE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $7,850 · OtherPROVIDENCE UNITED METHODIST CHURCHZOE: $7,100 · OtherZOEMedshare - Ukranian Relief: $5,500 · OtherMedshare - Ukranian ReliefPlanned Parenthood National: $4,750 · OtherPlanned Parenthood NationalWater for the People: $2,500 · Other+7 more: $5,825 · Other+7 moreWATER FOR PEOPLE: $8,250 · InternationalWATER FOR PEOPLEInternational Rescue Committee INC: $6,500 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committ…CROSBY FUND FOR HAITIAN EDUC INC: $5,450 · InternationalCROSBY FUND FOR HAITIAN EDUC…CHILDREN OF GRACE: $4,446 · InternationalCHILDREN OF GRACESUSTAINED ACTS INC: $3,340 · InternationalSUSTAINED ACTS INCMEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC: $3,000 · InternationalMEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INCSHELTERBOX USA INC: $8,750 · Human ServicesSHELTERBOX USA…TURNING POINT OF LEHIGH VALLEY INC: $5,800 · Human ServicesTURNING POINT …Crisis Assistance Ministry: $625 · Human Services+1 more: $200 · Human ServicesREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $9,450 · Civil RightsREFUGEE &…Transgender Law Center: $1,000 · Civil RightsTransgend…GLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN: $7,750 · Arts & CultureCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $1,500 · Food & NutritionSecond Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc: $350 · Food & NutritionIt Starts With Soccer: $300 · Youth Development
Other$56,125International$30,986Human Services$15,375Civil Rights$10,450Arts & Culture$7,750Food & Nutrition$1,850Youth Development$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $9,450 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTERBOX USA INC: $8,750 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWATER FOR PEOPLE: $8,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN: $7,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $6,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT OF LEHIGH VALLEY INC: $5,800 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCROSBY FUND FOR HAITIAN EDUC INC: $5,450 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN OF GRACE: $4,446 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSUSTAINED ACTS INC: $3,340 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetMEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTransgender Law Center: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCrisis Assistance Ministry: $625 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSecond Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIt Starts With Soccer: $300 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMATTHEWS HELP CENTER: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds SHELTERBOX USA INC ↗
  • Who funds WATER FOR PEOPLE ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT OF LEHIGH VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSBY FUND FOR HAITIAN EDUC INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN OF GRACE ↗
  • Who funds SUSTAINED ACTS INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds Transgender Law Center ↗
  • Who funds Crisis Assistance Ministry ↗
  • Who funds Second Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc ↗
  • Who funds It Starts With Soccer ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHT BLESSINGS ↗
  • Who funds MATTHEWS HELP CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC10.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Kenyon Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Kenyon Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kenyon Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph