Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Kelly and Michael Tzannes Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$82kEducation$11kYouth Development$11kFood & Nutrition$10kHuman Services$4kRecreation & Sports$3kHealth$2kEnvironment$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$500k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
METALWERX$5,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$2,500
CAMP JABBERWOCKY$2,500
MASS EYE AND EAR$2,000
WESTPORT LAND TRUST$2,000
OBAMA PRESIDENTIAL CENTER$1,500
GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK$1,500
SHATTERPROOFORG$1,000
SANDY HOOK PROMISE$1,000
THE WISH PROJECT$1,000
BOSTON FOUNDATION$1,000
IN CONTROL CRASH PREVENTION$1,000
GNOME SURF$500
WEST PLACE ANIMAL SANCTURY$500
BALTIMORE CLAYWORKS$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%ASCENTRIA CARE ALLIANCE: $1k → 11%ASCENTRIA CARE ALLIANCE: $500 → 11%ASCENTRIA CARE ALLIANCE: $300 → 11%ASCENTRIA CARE ALLIANCE: $150 → 11%ASCENTRIA CARE ALLIANCE: $100 → 11%ASCENTRIA CARE ALLIANCE: $100 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
CT
RI
CA
CO
MD
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$125k · 22 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
9

Total granted

$125k
$2k

Still filing today

64%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MI
    Metalwerx Inc
    6× · 2019–2025 · $77k · revenue +43%
  • Trustees of Tufts College
    3× · 2020–2022 · $6k · revenue +39%
  • TR
    THE RECORD COMPANY INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $4k · revenue +353%

Funded once

  • E
    EVERYTOWN
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • MA
    MAKE A WISH
    one grant, 2022 · $300
  • DF
    DR FARM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $250
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
3
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
4
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
5
Bartlett Arboretum Association Inc

To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.

Environment
6
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
7
Jewelers of America Inc

Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.

—
8
Boston Society of Architects

The boston society of architects (bsa/aia) exists to improve the quality of life for boston-area residents by championing innovation in the built environment. as a membership association, we achieve this mission in partnership with the bsa…

—
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
11
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
12
Worldatwork

To sponsor and conduct educational conferences, seminars, workshops and symposia for purposes of informing members and other interested parties on current research, legislation and practices in all phases of employee reward programs…

Membership Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ascentria Care Alliance Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
9/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Metalwerx Inc: $77,000 · EducationMetalwerx IncTrustees of Tufts College: $6,000 · EducationTrustees of Tufts CollegeHIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE INC: $4,000 · EducationIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKENEDY CENTER KIDS COOKING GREEN: $6,500 · OtherKENEDY CENTER KIDS COOKING GR…GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $2,767 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INCBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $2,500 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERSMARTHA'S VINEYARD CEREBRAL PALSY CAMP INC: $2,500 · OtherMARTHA'S VINEYARD CEREBRAL PA…WESTPORT LAND TRUST: $2,000 · OtherWESTPORT LAND TRUSTMASS EYE AND EAR: $2,000 · OtherMASS EYE AND EARIN CONTROL CRASH PREVENTION: $1,550 · OtherOBAMA PRESIDENTIAL CENTER: $1,500 · OtherTHE WISH PROJECT: $1,300 · Other+19 more: $6,875 · Other+19 moreTENACITY INC: $7,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE RECORD COMPANY INC: $4,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SOCIETY OF ARTS AND CRAFTS: $500 · Arts & CultureBALTIMORE CLAYWORKS INC: $500 · Arts & CultureASCENTRIA CARE ALLIANCE INC: $2,150 · Human ServicesSOCIETY OF NORTH AMERICAN GOLDSMITHS: $250 · Human ServicesBoston Foundation Inc: $1,000 · PhilanthropyBirthday Wishes Inc: $500 · PhilanthropySANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $1,100 · Crime & LegalWEST PLACE ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $500 · Animals
Education$87,000Other$37,492Recreation & Sports$7,000Arts & Culture$5,000Human Services$2,400Philanthropy$1,500Crime & Legal$1,100Animals$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMetalwerx Inc: $77,000 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetTENACITY INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RECORD COMPANY INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $2,767 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMARTHA'S VINEYARD CEREBRAL PALSY CAMP INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetASCENTRIA CARE ALLIANCE INC: $2,150 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WISH PROJECT: $1,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBoston Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST PLACE ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIETY OF NORTH AMERICAN GOLDSMITHS: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONNECTION INC: $200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $200 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Metalwerx Inc ↗
  • Who funds TENACITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
  • Who funds THE RECORD COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S VINEYARD CEREBRAL PALSY CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds ASCENTRIA CARE ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WISH PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Boston Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Birthday Wishes Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE SOCIETY OF ARTS AND CRAFTS ↗
  • Who funds WEST PLACE ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds BALTIMORE CLAYWORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF NORTH AMERICAN GOLDSMITHS ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONNECTION INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eastern Bank FoundationMA12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Kelly and Michael Tzannes Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Kelly and Michael Tzannes Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • The Society of Arts and Crafts: 10% of income from government
  • The Nature Connection Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Baltimore Clayworks Inc: 5% of income from government
  • The Record Company Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Metalwerx Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Boston Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kelly and Michael Tzannes’ filings →

More from the funding graph