Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Keil Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$27k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$133kEnvironment$113kAnimals$20kReligion$8kHealth$8kArts & Culture$6kHuman Services$4kPhilanthropy$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$329k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Center for Biological Diversity$8,000
World Wildlife Fund$4,500
The Nature Conservancy$4,060
Environmental Defense Fund$4,000
Wildlife Conservation Society$2,000
Ballet Virginia$1,500
Sea Education Association$1,000
Princeton University$1,000
North Tahoe Hebrew Congregation$815
Collegiate School$100
Virginia Beach Vol Rescue Squad$100
Powhatan Vol Fire Dept$40
Amelia Volunteer Fire Dept$40
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Jewish Family Services: $2k → 22%Jewish Family Services: $1k → 22%Jewish Family Services: $750 → 22%Jewish Family Services: $500 → 22%Jewish Family Services: $500 → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$271k · 19 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
2

Total granted

$271k
$2k

Still filing today

68%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationAnimalsEnvironmentPublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The Trustees of Princeton University
    9× · 2017–2025 · $131k · revenue +5%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +127%
  • WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $23k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • JC
    Jewish Community Federation of Rich
    one grant, 2020 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
African Wildlife Foundation Inc

Awf's mission is to ensure wildlife and wild lands thrive in modern africa. we work to equip african governments, institutions, business, and communities with the tools, insights, and support they need to define, own, and realize a…

Animals
3
The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia

The mission is "to understand the natural world and inspire everyone to care for it." the academy implements its mission through understanding the diversity of life; developing and applying science to protect the environment; and informing…

Science & Tech
4
Natural Resources Defense Council Inc

We safeguard the earth: its people, its plants and animals, and (see schedule o) the natural systems on which all life depends. we work to restore the integrity of the elements that sustain life - air, land, and water - to defend…

Environment
5
Panthera Corporation

Panthera's mission is the conservation of the world's 40 wild cat species, many of which are endangered or threatened. panthera develops, implements and oversees wild cat conservation strategies on a global scale.

Animals
6
National Wildlife Federation

Unite all americans to ensure wildlife thrives in a rapidly changing world.

Animals
7
New Jersey Conservation Foundation

Recognizing that a healthy environment is critical to the well-being and survival of all living things, new jersey conservation foundation is devoted to preserving land and protecting natural resources throughout new jersey's (continued on…

Environment
8
National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment
9
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment
10
For the Fishes

To address, educate, coordinate, and enhance enforcement capacity to end teh trade in coral reef wildlife for household and other small display aquariums. our supply and demand side strategies are directed locally and globally to…

Animals
11
Swan Valley Connections

Maintain the swan valley's unique natural resources and ensure that a vibrant human community can sustain itself through stewardship, education, economic viability, and conservation on public and private lands.

Environment
12
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Amelia County Volunteer Fire Dept. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

The Trustees of Princeton University — $131,000 · EducationThe Trustees of Princeton University+2 more — $1,575 · EducationCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC — $39,500 · AnimalsCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL D…Wildlife Conservation Society — $20,150 · AnimalsWildlife Conservation S…THE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $20,760 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSER…SEA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION INC — $7,750 · OtherSEA EDUCATION ASS…Individual grant recipient — $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant …NORTH TAHOE HEBREW CONGREGATION — $7,330 · OtherNORTH TAHOE HEBRE…+6 more — $2,020 · OtherWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $22,900 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FU…ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $21,600 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEF…BALLET VIRGINIA — $5,500 · Arts & CultureJewish Family Services Inc — $4,250 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF RICHMOND — $1,650 · PhilanthropyAMELIA COUNTY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT — $310 · Public Safety & DisasterPOWHATAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT INC — $90 · Public Safety & Disaster
Education$132,575Animals$59,650Other$45,360Environment$44,500Arts & Culture$5,500Human Services$4,250Philanthropy$1,650Public Safety & Disaster$400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University — $131,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC — $39,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $22,900 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $21,600 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $20,760 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society — $20,150 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSEA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION INC — $7,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBALLET VIRGINIA — $5,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJewish Family Services Inc — $4,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF RICHMOND — $1,650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLLEGIATE SCHOOL — $1,400 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMELIA COUNTY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT — $310 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWELLS COLLEGE — $175 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPOWHATAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT INC — $90 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University
  • Who funds CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society
  • Who funds SEA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds BALLET VIRGINIA
  • Who funds Jewish Family Services Inc
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF RICHMOND
  • Who funds THE COLLEGIATE SCHOOL
  • Who funds AMELIA COUNTY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT
  • Who funds WELLS COLLEGE
  • Who funds POWHATAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The US Charitable Gift TrustMA14× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The US Charitable Gift Trust · Carmax Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Keil Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Sea Education Association Inc12% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph