Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Kaye Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
58
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$2.8M
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$8.8MHealth$8.6MPhilanthropy$6.5MEducation$2.6MHuman Services$1.1MReligion$1.0MInternational$674kFood & Nutrition$290kOther$0
02FY2025 · 58 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k26 grants · $83k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $386k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $585k
  • $250k+5 grants · $7.9M
$10,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UJA-FEDERATION OF NEW YORK$2,750,000
NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC$2,533,334
LINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS$1,808,901
CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MANHATTAN$525,000
COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS$250,000
HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY$101,000
AJC$100,000
PENN HILLEL$100,000
MOUNTAIN FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS$71,664
MOVING TRADITIONS$60,000
CITY HARVEST$52,320
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SAIS$50,000
BROOKLYN MUSEUM$50,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$48,334
CONGREGATION EMANU-EL OF WESTCHESTER$34,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $64k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 15%SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES: $3k → 17%JEWISH BOARD: $25k → 17%YMCA OF GREATER NEW YORK: $250 → 17%HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE: $20k → 17%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $13k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$25M · 69 repeat orgs$3.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

69 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2025, 38 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

69
118

Total granted

$25M
$2.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+3%

Still filing today

77%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $914k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $6.8M · revenue +55%
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $6.3M · revenue +27%
  • CITY HARVEST INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $228k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • LC
    Lincoln Center for the Arts
    one grant, 2019 · $1.0M
  • MM
    Marlene Meyerson JCC of Manhattan
    one grant, 2019 · $500k
  • UO
    University of Texas at Austin
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
The Baruch College Fund

The baruch college fund is an organization engaged in generating, encouraging and promoting the educational welfare of the students of the bernard m. baruch college of the city university of new york.

Education
6
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
7
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
9
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Museum of Manhattan; the most unlike its peers is Bronfman Youth Fellowships to Israel in Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

148 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 148 of the 221 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
147/148
Grantees still filing
87/148
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC: $7,533,334 · HealthNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND IN…+22 more: $549,603 · Health+22 moreLINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $6,750,734 · Arts & CultureLINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERF…CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MANHATTAN: $525,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MANHAT…+10 more: $258,667 · Arts & CultureUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $6,322,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FE…+11 more: $219,066 · PhilanthropyLincoln Center for the Arts: $1,000,000 · OtherLincoln Center…Marlene Meyerson JCC of Manhattan: $500,350 · OtherMarlene Meyers…CONGREGATION EMANU-EL OF WESTCHESTER: $222,430 · OtherCONGREGATION E…PENN HILLEL: $200,000 · OtherAJC: $150,000 · OtherCITY HARVEST INC: $227,873 · OtherCITY HARVEST I…MOVING TRADITIONS: $135,000 · Other+107 more: $1,593,865 · Other+107 moreTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $2,133,450 · Education+15 more: $158,767 · EducationTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC: $1,756,518 · Human Services+13 more: $97,001 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC: $306,666 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC: $131,668 · InternationalCARNEGIE ENDOWMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL PEACE: $105,000 · International+6 more: $33,484 · International
Health$8,082,937Arts & Culture$7,534,401Philanthropy$6,541,066Other$4,029,518Education$2,292,217Human Services$1,853,519International$576,818

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC: $7,533,334 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetLINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $6,750,734 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $6,322,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $2,133,450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC: $1,756,518 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MANHATTAN: $525,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC: $306,666 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $227,873 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMOVING TRADITIONS: $135,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $131,668 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM: $110,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCARNEGIE ENDOWMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL PEACE: $105,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $89,358 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CANCER CAUSE INC: $75,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetMOUNTAIN FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS: $71,664 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION: $66,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $59,334 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO PERINATAL CARE QUALITY COLLABORATIVE: $50,834 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK STEM CELL FOUNDATION INC: $46,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $35,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $30,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM: $27,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetChristian Herald Association Inc: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NEW YORK CITY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetIONA UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMECOX BAY CONSERVANCY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetProject Kesher: $24,735 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DRUG DISCOVERY FOUNDATION: $23,550 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLUNGEVITY FOUNDATION INC: $22,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $21,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE THANC FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetAPOLLO THEATER FOUNDATION INC: $16,667 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTEGRITY FIRST FOR AMERICA INC: $16,667 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $16,667 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKRISTI HOUSE INC: $16,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MANHATTAN ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds MOVING TRADITIONS ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds CARNEGIE ENDOWMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL PEACE ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST ↗
  • Who funds BLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CANCER CAUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO PERINATAL CARE QUALITY COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK STEM CELL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY35.7× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Warburg Pincus Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Tammy and Jay Levine Foundation Inc · Daniel L Nir & Jill E Braufman Family Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Hartman Family Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Fjc · Goldman-Sonnenfeldt Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Kaye Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Kaye Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Kristi House Inc: 49% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
  • Miami Lighthouse for the Blind and Visually Impaired Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 221 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kaye Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph