Skip to content
The Kathleen M Doyle Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Kathleen M Doyle Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$171kHealth$29kInternational$20kHuman Services$18kFood & Nutrition$13kReligion$10kArts & Culture$8kEnvironment$2k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$422k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS$20,000
EAST HAMPTON LIBRARY$7,500
HAMPTONS WHODUNIT$7,500
EAST HAMPTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HAMPTONS WHODUNIT: $8k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$218k · 12 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
6

Total granted

$218k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+69%

Still filing today

67%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 13% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationFood & NutritionInternationalHealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    BROOKS SCHOOL
    4× · 2020–2023 · $48k · revenue +61%
  • TT
    THE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $38k · revenue +106%
  • TS
    THE SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $20k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • NY
    NEW YORK COMMON PANTRY
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +20%
  • TC
    TRINITY COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +69%
  • TO
    TRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +74%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pembroke Hill School

A preschool through 12th grade, private, college preparatory school. the school's mission statement is "together, cultivating the best in each for the benefit of all."

Education
2
Phillips Exeter Academy

Unite goodness and knowledge and inspire youth from every quarter to lead purposeful lives. [text in quotations is taken from the academy's deed of gift, drafted in 1781] knowledge and goodness "above all, it is expected that the attention…

Education
3
Hampshire College Trustees

The mission of hampshire college is to foster a lifelong passion for learning, inquiry, and ethical citizenship that inspires students to contribute to knowledge, justice, and positive change in the world and, by doing so, to transform…

Education
4
The Chestnut Hill School

At the chestnut hill school, our mission to educate children is deeply rooted in a commitment to academic excellence, diversity, and community. we engage, challenge and support children as they develop the skills and confidence to achieve…

Education
5
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
6
The York School

York school is an award-winning, private, coed college-prep school for grades 8-12, that develops confident and authentic leaders. we offer an academically challenging experiential program for bright, kind, and driven students in an…

Education
7
Northfield Mount Hermon School

Northfield mount hermon educates the head, heart and hands of our students. we engage their intellect, compassion, and talents, empowering them to act with humanity and purpose.

Education
8
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

—
9
The Oaks School

In an atmosphere of mutual respect and responsibility, the oaks school prepares students to meet the world with the combined wisdom of an intelligent mind, a skilled hand, and a compassionate heart.

Education
10
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
11
Sage Hill School

We inspire in our students a love of knowledge and the ability to use that knowledge creatively, compassionately and courageously throughout their lives.sage hill school's commitment to academic excellence and our outstanding college…

Education
12
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Taft School Corporation; the most unlike its peers is New York Common Pantry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SPENCE SCHOOL: $65,000 · EducationTHE SPENCE SCHOOLBROOKS SCHOOL: $48,000 · EducationBROOKS SCHOOLTHE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION: $38,000 · EducationTHE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATIONTHE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL: $10,000 · EducationTHE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL+3 more: $7,000 · EducationTHE HANNAH AND RYAN BARRY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherTHE HANNAH A…EAST HAMPTON LIBRARY: $7,500 · OtherEAST HAMPTON…Individual grant recipient: $4,000 · OtherIndividual g…MOST HOLY TRINITY CHURCH: $4,000 · OtherMOST HOLY TR…THE ANNE MOORE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $2,000 · OtherTHE ANNE MOO…CHURCH OF ST THOMAS MORE: $2,000 · OtherCHURCH OF ST…THE SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · HealthTHE SOUTHAM…EAST HAMPTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $6,500 · HealthEAST HAMPTO…COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC: $20,000 · InternationalCOUNCIL O…Kucetekela Foundation: $3,000 · InternationalKucetekel…EAST HAMPTON FOOD PANTRY INC: $7,500 · Food & NutritionNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY: $5,000 · Food & NutritionHAMPTONSWHODUNIT INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC: $2,000 · Environment
Education$168,000Other$29,500Health$26,500International$23,000Food & Nutrition$12,500Human Services$7,500Environment$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SPENCE SCHOOL: $65,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBROOKS SCHOOL: $48,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION: $38,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAMPTONSWHODUNIT INC: $7,500 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetEAST HAMPTON LIBRARY: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEAST HAMPTON FOOD PANTRY INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetEAST HAMPTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $6,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY COLLEGE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKucetekela Foundation: $3,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRACE CHURCH SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNational Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Jewish Communal FundNY13.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Kathleen M Doyle Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Kathleen M Doyle Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Kathleen M Doyle Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Kathleen M Doyle Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kathleen M Doyle’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home