Skip to content

· Private foundation

The K Squared Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$696k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$2.0MRecreation & Sports$830kFood & Nutrition$660kEducation$352kHuman Services$330kReligion$200kHousing & Shelter$85kArts & Culture$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $4k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $367k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$51,979
Median grant
4
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE GALLOWAY SCHOOL$250,000
NORTHSIDE YOUTH ORGANIZATION$165,102
CITYMEALS ON WHEELS$150,000
PERMOBIL FOUNDATION$51,979
TEMPLE SINAI INC$40,000
CARTER BURDEN NETWORK$25,000
HOUSING WORKS$10,000
NEW ISRAEL FUND$3,640
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PERMOBIL FOUNDATION: $52k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.5M · 10 repeat orgs$168k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against -21% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$4.5M
$116k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
-21%

Still filing today

80%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NY
    NORTHSIDE YOUTH ORGANIZATION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $775k · revenue +20%
  • TG
    THE GALLOWAY SCHOOLS INC
    5× · 2017–2025 · $582k · revenue +10%
  • C
    CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS
    8× · 2017–2025 · $580k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • BB
    BACKPACK BUDDIES OF METRO ATLANTA INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue -21%
  • TZ
    THE ZADIE PROJECTINC
    one grant, 2023 · $21k · revenue -5%
  • MT
    MY TOWNE MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
2
New York Common Pantry

New york common pantry reduces hunger while promoting dignity, health and self-sufficiency.

Food & Nutrition
3
City Harvest Inc

To end hunger in communities throughout new york city. (see schedule o)to end hunger in communities throughout new york city. we do this through food rescue and distribution, education, and other practical, innovative solutions.

Food & Nutrition
4
Capital Area Food Bank Inc

The mission of the capital area food bank (the food bank or cafb) is to help our neighbors thrive by creating more equitable access to food and opportunity through community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
5
Nazareth Housing Inc

See schedule oto promote housing stability and economic mobility among vulnerable families and individuals of new york city through the provision of homelessness prevention services, emergency family shelter, supportive housing, and urgent…

Housing & Shelter
6
Nashville Food Project Inc

The nashville food project brings people together to grow, cook, and share nourishing food to cultivate community and alleviate hunger. through community food access, agriculture, education, and strategic partnerships, we work toward a…

Food & Nutrition
7
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
8
Meals for Good Inc

To reduce food insecurity for all people living in New York City by increasing access and choice to culturally relevant healthy food. We envision a time when everyone in NYC will have equitable access to a variety of healthy, fresh food.…

Food & Nutrition
9
Pibly Residential Programs Inc

Pibly's mission embraces the belief that the needs of its consumers can be met and their goals can be achieved. pibly strives to expand opportunities for people living with mental health challenges by delivering person centered services…

—
10
Hunger Free America Inc

Hunger free america (hfa) is a nonpartisan, national nonprofit organization building the movement to enact the policies and programs needed to end domestic hunger and ensure that all americans have sufficient access to nutritious food.

—
11
Yad Ezra V'shulamit

Yad ezra v'shulamit's mission is to provide over 300,000 people in israel with food and basic supplies for those living in poverty by distributing 12,000 weekly food baskets. with a focus on children we try to ensure that hundreds of…

International
12
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Philanthropic Trust; the most unlike its peers is Northside Youth Organization Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY DONOR ADVISED FUND: $1,468,801 · OtherFIDELITY DONOR ADVISED FUNDTHE GALLOWAY SCHOOLS INC: $582,000 · OtherTHE GALLOWAY SCHOOLS INCCARTER BURDEN NETWORK INC: $260,000 · OtherCARTER BURDEN NETWORK INCTEMPLE SINAI INC: $240,000 · OtherTEMPLE SINAI INC+5 more: $70,000 · OtherNORTHSIDE YOUTH ORGANIZATION INC: $775,302 · Recreation & SportsNORTHSIDE YOUTH ORGAN…CHASTAIN HORSE PARK LTD: $220,000 · Recreation & SportsCHASTAIN HORSE PARK L…CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $580,000 · Food & NutritionCITYMEALS-ON-WHEEL…SECOND HELPINGS ATLANTA INC: $174,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HELPINGS AT…SOLIDARITY SANDY SPRINGS INC: $95,000 · Food & NutritionSOLIDARITY SANDY S…+1 more: $21,000 · Food & NutritionNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $564,325 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHI…HOUSING WORKS INC: $95,000 · Community ImprovementPERMOBIL FOUNDATION: $51,979 · Human ServicesBACKPACK BUDDIES OF METRO ATLANTA INC: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentNEW ISRAEL FUND: $3,640 · International
Other$2,620,801Recreation & Sports$995,302Food & Nutrition$870,000Philanthropy$564,325Community Improvement$95,000Human Services$51,979Youth Development$25,000International$3,640

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHSIDE YOUTH ORGANIZATION INC: $775,302 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetTHE GALLOWAY SCHOOLS INC: $582,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $580,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $564,325 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARTER BURDEN NETWORK INC: $260,000 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetCHASTAIN HORSE PARK LTD: $220,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetSECOND HELPINGS ATLANTA INC: $174,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSOLIDARITY SANDY SPRINGS INC: $95,000 over 2y, 9.7% of budgetHOUSING WORKS INC: $95,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPERMOBIL FOUNDATION: $51,979 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetBACKPACK BUDDIES OF METRO ATLANTA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE ZADIE PROJECTINC: $21,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetBERKSHIRE PLAYWRIGHTS LAB INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTHSIDE YOUTH ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GALLOWAY SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds CARTER BURDEN NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds CHASTAIN HORSE PARK LTD ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HELPINGS ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds SOLIDARITY SANDY SPRINGS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING WORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds PERMOBIL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BACKPACK BUDDIES OF METRO ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ZADIE PROJECTINC ↗
  • Who funds BERKSHIRE PLAYWRIGHTS LAB INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta IncGA19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Hms Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The K Squared Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The K Squared Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The K Squared Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The K Squared Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on K Squared’s filings →

    More from the funding graph