Skip to content
The Junior League of Greensboro Nc Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

The Junior League of Greensboro Nc Inc

Promoting voluntarism, developing the potential of women and improving the community through leadership training and volunteering.

$33k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$85kHuman Services$21kFood & Nutrition$17kHealth$750Crime & Legal$100Philanthropy$50
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $29,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $33,025 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $3,525 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
$8,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY HOUSING SOLUTIONS OF GUILFORD INC$14,000
BACKPACK BEGINNINGS$8,500
A SIMPLE GESTURE$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%DIAPER BANK OF NC: $930 → 11%WELL-SPRING: $100 → 16%BACKPACK BEGINNINGS: $10k → 16%BACKPACK BEGINNINGS: $9k → 16%BACKPACK BEGINNINGS: $750 → 16%BACKPACK BEGINNINGS: $250 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$120k · 4 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +340% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
5

Total granted

$120k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+340%
+14%

Still filing today

100%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    COMMUNITY HOUSING SOLUTIONS OF GUILFORD INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $85k · revenue +145%
  • BB
    BACKPACK BEGINNINGS
    4× · 2020–2025 · $19k · revenue +340%
  • AS
    A SIMPLE GESTURE - GREENSBORO INC
    2× · 2020–2025 · $8k · revenue +369%

Funded once

  • DB
    DIAPER BANK OF NORTH CAROLINAgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $930 · revenue +130%
  • SR
    SENIOR RESOURCES OF GUILFORD
    one grant, 2021 · $800 · revenue -12%
  • GC
    GUILFORD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    one grant, 2021 · $750
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
2
Harvest Hope Food Bank

Harvest hope is on a mission to eliminate hunger and food insecurity in south carolina. we rescue nutritious food from stores throughout the state and distribute it to food pantries, shelters, and soup kitchens. we operate programs that…

Food & Nutrition
3
Second Harvest Food Bank of Northwest Nc Inc

To provide food assistance through a network of partners, while educating and engaging our communities in the elimination of hunger and its causes.

Food & Nutrition
4
Second Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc

To feed people by soliciting and distributing food and other products through partner agencies and educating the community about the nature of and solutions to problems of hunger.

Food & Nutrition
5
Food Bank of Greenwood County

The mission of the food bank of greenwood county is to reduce hunger through community cooperation, effectively distributing donated grocery products and perishable foods, and making the best possible use of all available resources.

Food & Nutrition
6
Farmer Foodshare Inc

Our mission is to increase access to fresh, local food for all while supporting the viability of marginalized farmers to create a more equitable food system.

Food & Nutrition
7
Feed Your Neighbor Community Food Pantry Inc

To distribute emergency food assistance to individuals and families in the greenville area, and to cooperate with partnering agencies so that recipients have access to the greatest number of nutritional resources.

Food & Nutrition
8
Goodwill Industries of Central North Car

Goodwill industries of central north carolina, inc.'s mission is improving lives and enriching communities through the power of work

Employment
9
Food Bank of the Albemarle

To fight hunger and poverty in northeastern north carolina.

Food & Nutrition
10
Goodwill Industries of the Southern Piedmont Inc

Goodwill builds pathways that help people pursue the life they want to achieve. goodwill exists to help people see possibilities, seize opportunities, and prosper. we partner with individuals to identify their strengths, interests and…

Employment
11
Cabarrus Cooperative Christian Ministry

To respond to the growing need in our community by providing immediate assistance to residents of Concord, Kannapolis, and Cabarrus County, NC who are experiencing crisis in the areas of food, shelter or finances while providing them…

—
12
Greenest

To provide hope to families in crisis as they transition into sustainable housing by offering access to affordable home furnishings.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Senior Resources of Guilford; the most unlike its peers is Church World Service Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY HOUSING SOLUTIONS OF GUILFORD INC: $84,500 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY HOUSING SOLUTIONS OF GUILFORD INCBACKPACK BEGINNINGS: $19,000 · Human ServicesBACKPACK BEGINNINGSDIAPER BANK OF NORTH CAROLINA: $930 · Human ServicesSENIOR RESOURCES OF GUILFORD: $800 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesGREENSBORO FARMERS MARKET INC: $9,200 · Food & NutritionGREENSBORO FARM…A SIMPLE GESTURE - GREENSBORO INC: $7,750 · Food & NutritionA SIMPLE GESTUR…GUILFORD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES: $750 · OtherGUILFORD COUNTY FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER: $100 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER GREENSBORO INC: $50 · Philanthropy
Housing & Shelter$84,500Human Services$20,830Food & Nutrition$16,950Other$850Philanthropy$50

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY HOUSING SOLUTIONS OF GUILFORD INC: $84,500 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetBACKPACK BEGINNINGS: $19,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGREENSBORO FARMERS MARKET INC: $9,200 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetA SIMPLE GESTURE - GREENSBORO INC: $7,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDIAPER BANK OF NORTH CAROLINA: $930 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSENIOR RESOURCES OF GUILFORD: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWELL-SPRING RETIREMENT COMMUNITY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER GREENSBORO INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Moses Cone - Wesley L…Tannenbaum-Sternberge…Community Foundation …Lincoln Financial Fou…The Mary Lynn Richard…The Foundation for a …David and Claudia Bab…High Point Community …United Way of Greater…Weaver Foundation IncAmg Charitable Gift F…The Blackbaud Giving …
Moses Cone - Wesley Long Community Health FoundationNC20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Moses Cone - Wesley Long Community Health Foundation · Tannenbaum-Sternberger Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Greater Greensboro Inc · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · The Mary Lynn Richardson Fund · The Foundation for a Healthy High Point · David and Claudia Babb Reich Family Foundation · High Point Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Greensboro Inc · Weaver Foundation Inc · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Junior League of Greensboro Nc Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Junior League of Greensboro Nc Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Junior League of Greensboro Nc’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home