Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jules and Gwen Knapp Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2.5M
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$133kEducation$77kReligion$30kHuman Services$22kHealth$21kYouth Development$20kInternational$11kScience & Tech$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,477,805
Median grant
1
States reached
$102M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SEE DETAILED STATEMENT$2,477,805
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $150 → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF SAN DIEGO: $5k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF SAN DIEGO: $2k → 11%IMPACT 100 MARTIN: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
PA
CT
CA
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.7M · 16 repeat orgs$188k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
53

Total granted

$5.7M
$188k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+19%

Still filing today

44%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    2× · 2020–2021 · $120k · revenue +13%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO
    2× · 2020–2021 · $7k · revenue +174%
  • Northwestern University
    2× · 2020–2021 · $5k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • J
    JUF
    one grant, 2022 · $70k
  • JD
    JEFFREY D SOLLENDER BUSINESS AND PHILANTHROPIC YOUTH ENTREPRENEURSHIP FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • JC
    JCFS CHICAGO-KNAPP SCHOOL AND YESHIVA
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
2
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
3
Gainesville Jewish Student Foundation Inc

The gainesville jewish student foundation, inc. (known as schilit hillel at uf) mission: schilit hillel at uf enriches the lives of jewish students, inspiring them to make an enduring commitment to jewish life, learning, and israel

—
4
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
5
Greater Miami Hillel Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate and graduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

—
6
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
7
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
8
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
9
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
10
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
11
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
12
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Hebrew University Inc; the most unlike its peers is Michael Rolfe Pancreatic Cancer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
23/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SEE DETAILED STATEMENT: $5,497,755 · OtherSEE DETAILED STATEMENT+50 more: $207,850 · OtherJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $120,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $1,150 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $50,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $5,000 · International+4 more: $1,050 · InternationalJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $7,306 · Human ServicesTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $5,000 · Human ServicesImpact100 Martin Inc: $3,000 · Human Services+1 more: $150 · Human ServicesNorthwestern University: $4,500 · Recreation & SportsVISTA HILL FOUNDATION: $2,500 · HealthTHE HOUSE OF HOPE INC: $250 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $150 · Health+2 more: $200 · HealthFLORIDA OCEANOGRAPHIC SOCIETY INC: $1,000 · Science & Tech
Other$5,705,605Philanthropy$121,150International$56,050Human Services$15,456Recreation & Sports$4,500Health$3,100Science & Tech$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $120,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $13,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $7,306 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL OF SAN DIEGO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVISTA HILL FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORT AMERICA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA OCEANOGRAPHIC SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOUSE OF HOPE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAILFISH POINT FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMichael Rolfe Pancreatic Cancer Foundation: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIGHT OF THE WORLD CHARITIES INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION INC: $75 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds THE NIGHT MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds Impact100 Martin Inc ↗
  • Who funds VISTA HILL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ORT AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA OCEANOGRAPHIC SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDS OF VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation - Martin / St Lucie IncFL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation - Martin / St Lucie Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jules and Gwen Knapp Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jules and Gwen Knapp Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Florida Sheriffs Association Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Florida Oceanographic Society Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Jules and Gwen Knapp Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Jules and Gwen Knapp Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jules and Gwen Knapp’s filings →

More from the funding graph