Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Judy and Bernard Briskin Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$653k
Granted FY2026still arriving
3
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$550k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$6.3MPhilanthropy$702kHousing & Shelter$400kEducation$384kCommunity Improvement$175kReligion$87kEmployment$55kYouth Development$5kOther$0
02FY2026 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $550k
$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VENICE FAMILY CLINIC$550,000
THE PEOPLE CONCREN$100,000
THE VENKATRAMAN MEMORIAL TRUST$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–26, $500k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE PEOPLE CONCREN: $100k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCREN: $100k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCREN: $100k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $100k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCREN: $100k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.6M · 9 repeat orgs$61k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +89% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2026, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
9

Total granted

$8.6M
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+89%
+16%

Still filing today

44%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationHealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTER
    4× · 2022–2025 · $4.0M · revenue +89% · 50% of their budget
  • VENICE FAMILY CLINIC
    4× · 2022–2026 · $2.8M · revenue +16%
  • TP
    THE PEOPLE CONCERN
    4× · 2022–2026 · $500k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • C
    CAREMESSAGEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +213%
  • The School for Ethics and Global Leadershipgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +90%
  • AJ
    AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue -9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
2
The Center in Hollywood

The center provides a place of community to end isolation, build relationships, and introduce housing, health and wellness services to adult individuals experiencing homelessness in hollywood. it contracts with public and non-profit grant…

Human Services
3
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
4
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
5
Palo Alto University Inc

Advancing human understanding through education, research, and practice in behavioral science

Education
6
Via Care Community Health Center

Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.

Health
7
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
8
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
9
Laguna Beach Community Clinic

The mission of laguna beach community clinic (lbcc) is to provide excellent medical care regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
10
Community Clinic Association of Los Angeles County

Ccalac empowers community health centers to remain at the forefront of health care transformation. we forge partnerships, foster innovation, promote health equity, and advocate for the communities they serve.

Health
11
Los Angeles General Medical Center Foundation Inc

To support and enhance the mission of the los angeles general medical center (formerly the lac+usc medical center) and ensure it maintains its status as a leader in medicine, education and research, and continues to provide the highest…

—
12
California Institute of Integral Studies

Ciis is an institution of higher education that encourages an interdisciplinary approach to learning. over 1,700 students are enrolled in masters, doctoral, bachelor of arts completion programs, and certifications. ours is a mosaic of…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Partners; the most unlike its peers is The School for Ethics and Global Leadership. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTER: $4,040,000 · OtherTHE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTERJEWISH FEDERATION: $700,818 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATIONCOLLEGE MATCHCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $337,500 · OtherCOLLEGE MATCHCOMMUNITY PARTNERS+8 more: $160,695 · OtherVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $2,750,000 · HealthVENICE FAMILY CLINIC+1 more: $540 · HealthTHE PEOPLE CONCERN: $500,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $172,500 · Community ImprovementUCLA FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationCAREMESSAGE: $25,000 · EducationThe School for Ethics and Global Leadership: $15,000 · EducationAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $5,779 · Education
Other$5,239,013Health$2,750,540Human Services$500,000Community Improvement$172,500Education$70,779

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTER: $4,040,000 over 4y, 50% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $2,750,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CONCERN: $500,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $172,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAREMESSAGE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetThe School for Ethics and Global Leadership: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $5,779 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL AT UCLA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE: $540 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds VENICE FAMILY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds THE PEOPLE CONCERN ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAREMESSAGE ↗
  • Who funds The School for Ethics and Global Leadership ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL AT UCLA ↗
  • Who funds DIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY14× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Judy and Bernard Briskin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Judy and Bernard Briskin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Judy and Bernard Briskin Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Judy and Bernard Briskin Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Judy and Bernard Briskin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph