Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Judith E & Joseph C Cook Jr Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
43
Grants FY2024still arriving
16
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$4.3MHuman Services$2.4MEducation$863kYouth Development$658kHealth$640kCommunity Improvement$575kInternational$540kPhilanthropy$301kOther$0
02FY2024 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k28 grants · $660k
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.1M
$30,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$51M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARTHA O'BRYAN CENTER$100,000
BLACK MOUNTAIN HOME FOR CHILDREN$100,000
BELMONT UNIVERSITY$100,000
MERCY MINISTRIES$100,000
SILOAM FAMILY HEALTH CENTER$100,000
PRAXIS INC$100,000
REDEEMER CITY TO CITY$90,000
HOPE INTERNATIONAL$85,000
MICAH PROJECT$80,000
REFORMED UNIVERSITY FELLOWSHIP$60,000
UPRISE NASHVILLE$60,000
CHRIST CHURCH NASHVILLE$50,000
MISSION INCREASE FOUNDATION$50,000
CHALMERS CENTER$50,000
BILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOC$40,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MADE TO FLOURISH: $30k → 5%NARROW GATE FOUNDATION: $30k → 15%HIINGA: $20k → 10%CHRISTIAN ALLIANCE FOR ORPHANS: $40k → 6%MADE TO FLOURISH: $30k → 5%NARROW GATE FOUNDATION: $30k → 15%HIINGA: $20k → 10%CHRISTIAN ALLIANCE FOR ORPHANS: $40k → 6%MADE TO FLOURISH: $30k → 5%NARROW GATE FOUNDATION: $30k → 15%HIINGA: $20k → 10%CHRISTIAN ALLIANCE FOR ORPHANS: $40k → 6%MADE TO FLOURISH: $30k → 5%NARROW GATE FOUNDATION: $25k → 15%HIINGA: $20k → 10%CHRISTIAN ALLIANCE FOR ORPHANS: $35k → 6%MADE TO FLOURISH: $25k → 5%NARROW GATE FOUNDATION: $20k → 15%HIINGA: $20k → 10%CHRISTIAN ALLIANCE FOR ORPHANS: $30k → 6%NARROW GATE FOUNDATION: $15k → 15%HIINGA: $15k → 10%CHRISTIAN ALLIANCE FOR ORPHANS: $25k → 6%CORNER TO CORNER: $8k → 14%BLACK MOUNTAIN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $125k → 12%BLACK MOUNTAIN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $100k → 12%CORNER TO CORNER: $5k → 14%BLACK MOUNTAIN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $100k → 12%BLACK MOUNTAIN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $100k → 12%BLACK MOUNTAIN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $100k → 12%BLACK MOUNTAIN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $100k → 12%BLACK MOUNTAIN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $100k → 12%BLACK MOUNTAIN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $100k → 12%CORNER TO CORNER: $30k → 14%CORNER TO CORNER: $30k → 14%CORNER TO CORNER: $30k → 14%CORNER TO CORNER: $23k → 14%CORNER TO CORNER: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
PA
CA
MO
VA
KS
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 28% of The Judith E & Joseph C Cook Jr Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 43% of the giving stays in TN; by stated purpose, 32%.

The Judith E & Joseph C Cook Jr Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.9% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 54 repeat orgs$176k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +48% for those funded once.

54 repeat relationships: 40 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
9

Total granted

$11M
$141k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+48%

Still filing today

69%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesInternationalEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BM
    BLACK MOUNTAIN HOME FOR CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $825k · revenue +329%
  • MO
    MARTHA O'BRYAN CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $800k · revenue +153%
  • SH
    SILOAM HEALTH
    6× · 2017–2024 · $625k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • NI
    NASHVILLE INSTITUTE FOR FAITH AND WORK
    one grant, 2020 · $40k
  • MF
    MIDTOWN FELLOWSHIP CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $30k
  • CP
    COVENANT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
3
Lakelight Institute

Lakelight Institute equips Christians with timeless wisdom for modern life.

Religion
4
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
5
Center of Theological Inquiry

The Center of Theological Inquiry is an independent research institution with an international visiting scholar program which convenes researchers in an ideal setting for interdisciplinary inquiries where theology casts light on global…

Religion
6
Center for Christianity and Public Life

To contend for the credibility of christian resources in public life, for the public good.

Religion
7
Charlotte Christian College & Theological Seminary

To educate, train, and develop ministers, evangelists, missionaries, and other people who are going to enter the Christian ministry. Educate ministers and missionaries to serve the Lord.

Religion
8
Crossing Cultures International Inc

Crossing Cultures International, Inc. exists to glorify God by equipping Christ followers globally with comprehensive training for effective ministry.

Religion
9
Manna University

Manna University is a biblical higher education institution dedicated to educating, equipping, and empowering emerging leaders to change the world.

Education
10
Lx Ministries Inc

Our mission is to multiply the global impact and influence of Christian leaders and pastors throughout their organizations and communities. Our activities involve working with members of the leadership of other exclusively charitable…

Religion
11
Asbury Theological Seminary

Asbury Theological Seminary is a community called to prepare theologically educated, sanctified, Spirit-filled men and women to evangelize and to spread scriptural holiness throughout the world through the love of Jesus Christ, in the…

Education
12
Raise Up Global Ministries

Raise Up Global Ministries is committed to educating Christian leaders in communities around the world. The three programs of Raise Up equip the global church by 1 Developing biblically based interactive materials and 2 Training…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chalmers Center for Economic Development; the most unlike its peers is Scarlet Hope Nashville. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/43
Grantees still filing
32/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SILOAM HEALTH: $625,000 · OtherSILOAM HEALTHMERCY MINISTRIES: $600,000 · OtherMERCY MINISTRIESCHRIST CHURCH PENTECOSTAL: $380,000 · OtherCHRIST CHURCH PENTECOSTALUPRISE NASHVILLE: $280,000 · OtherUPRISE NASHVILLEPCA REFORMED UNIVERSITY MINISTRIES: $230,000 · OtherPCA REFORMED UNIVERSITY MINISTRIESCHRIST CHURCH: $225,000 · OtherCHRIST CHURCHSILOAM FAITH INSTITUTE: $210,000 · OtherMERCY MULTIPLIED AMERICA INC: $200,000 · OtherBILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOC: $200,000 · OtherST PAUL CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $155,000 · Other+21 more: $918,750 · Other+21 moreMARTHA O'BRYAN CENTER INC: $800,000 · ReligionMARTHA O'BRYAN CENTER INCPraxis Inc: $460,000 · ReligionPraxis IncRedeemer City To City: $410,000 · ReligionRedeemer City To CityANGEL MINISTRIES: $400,000 · ReligionANGEL MINISTRIESMISSION INCREASE FOUNDATION: $235,000 · ReligionMISSION INCREASE FOUNDATIONTHE VERITAS FORUM INC: $165,000 · ReligionTHE VERITAS FORUM INCHISPANIC MINISTRY CENTER: $130,000 · ReligionINTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP COALITION: $127,500 · ReligionOPERATION ANDREW GROUP INC: $118,000 · ReligionArrabon Inc: $105,000 · Religion+2 more: $20,000 · ReligionBLACK MOUNTAIN HOME FOR CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC: $825,000 · Human ServicesBLACK MOUNTAIN HO…Christian Alliance for Orphans: $210,000 · Human ServicesChristian Allianc…NARROW GATE FOUNDATION: $150,000 · Human ServicesNARROW GATE FOUND…Corner To Corner: $145,000 · Human ServicesCorner To CornerMADE TO FLOURISH INC: $145,000 · Human ServicesMADE TO FLOURISH …HIINGA INC: $115,000 · Human ServicesHIINGA INCCUL2VATE: $115,000 · Human ServicesCUL2VATEMICAH PROJECT INC: $527,500 · InternationalMICAH PROJECT…HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $425,000 · InternationalHOPE INTERNAT…CHALMERS CENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: $235,000 · InternationalCHALMERS CENT…MISSIONS DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL: $80,000 · InternationalMISSIONS DEVE…+2 more: $35,000 · InternationalMONTREAT COLLEGE: $320,000 · EducationFULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $220,000 · EducationBelmont University: $102,500 · EducationCARVER PROJECT: $30,000 · Education+2 more: $35,000 · EducationTRINITY FORUM INC: $220,000 · PhilanthropyThe Big Table: $45,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyActon Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty: $242,500 · Civil Rights
Other$4,023,750Religion$2,970,500Human Services$1,705,000International$1,302,500Education$707,500Philanthropy$275,000Civil Rights$242,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLACK MOUNTAIN HOME FOR CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC: $825,000 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetMARTHA O'BRYAN CENTER INC: $800,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetSILOAM HEALTH: $625,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetMICAH PROJECT INC: $527,500 over 8y, 5.4% of budgetPraxis Inc: $460,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetHOPE INTERNATIONAL: $425,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetRedeemer City To City: $410,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetANGEL MINISTRIES: $400,000 over 7y, 9.4% of budgetMONTREAT COLLEGE: $320,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetActon Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty: $242,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetMISSION INCREASE FOUNDATION: $235,000 over 7y, 4.6% of budgetCHALMERS CENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: $235,000 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetTRINITY FORUM INC: $220,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetFULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $220,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetChristian Alliance for Orphans: $210,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetMERCY MULTIPLIED AMERICA INC: $200,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE VERITAS FORUM INC: $165,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetNARROW GATE FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetCorner To Corner: $145,000 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetMADE TO FLOURISH INC: $145,000 over 5y, 18% of budgetHISPANIC MINISTRY CENTER: $130,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetINTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP COALITION: $127,500 over 7y, 10% of budgetTHE RABBIT ROOM: $125,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetOPERATION ANDREW GROUP INC: $118,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetHIINGA INC: $115,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetCUL2VATE: $115,000 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetOUTREACH FOUNDATION OF THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH INC: $112,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetArrabon Inc: $105,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetBelmont University: $102,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMISSIONS DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL: $80,000 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetTHE GATHERING: $60,000 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetCOALITION FOR CHRISTIAN OUTREACH: $55,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe Big Table: $45,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetScarlet Hope Nashville: $30,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetPROJECT CONNECT INC: $30,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCARVER PROJECT: $30,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetVOCA CENTER INC: $20,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetFAITH FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget28TWELVE FOUNDATION LTD: $15,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetNATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPROFESSIONALS IN CHRISTIAN PHILANTHROPY: $10,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetCAROLINA CHRISTIAN STUDY CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEXILE INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLACK MOUNTAIN HOME FOR CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA O'BRYAN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SILOAM HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds MICAH PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Praxis Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Redeemer City To City ↗
  • Who funds ANGEL MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds MONTREAT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty ↗
  • Who funds MISSION INCREASE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHALMERS CENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY FORUM INC ↗
  • Who funds FULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
  • Who funds Christian Alliance for Orphans ↗
  • Who funds MERCY MULTIPLIED AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE VERITAS FORUM INC ↗
  • Who funds NARROW GATE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Corner To Corner ↗
  • Who funds MADE TO FLOURISH INC ↗
  • Who funds HISPANIC MINISTRY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP COALITION ↗
  • Who funds THE RABBIT ROOM ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION ANDREW GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds HIINGA INC ↗
  • Who funds CUL2VATE ↗
  • Who funds OUTREACH FOUNDATION OF THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH INC ↗
  • Who funds Arrabon Inc ↗
  • Who funds Belmont University ↗
  • Who funds MISSIONS DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS35.4× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · The Maclellan Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · International Generosity Foundation Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Ten Talents Foundation · First Fruit Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Judith E & Joseph C Cook Jr Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Judith E & Joseph C Cook Jr Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Judith E & Joseph C Cook Jr Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Judith E & Joseph C Cook Jr Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Judith E & Joseph C Cook Jr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph