· Private foundation
The Judith and Marshall Meyer Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k49 grants · $69k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $45k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WOOD RIVER JEWISH COMMUNITY INC | $15,280 |
| WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY | $10,000 |
| SUN VALLEY CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE | $10,000 |
| SUN VALLEY WRITERS CONFERENCE INC | $8,000 |
| COMMUNITY LIBRARY ASSOCIATION INC KETCHUM SUN VALL | $7,000 |
| PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART | $5,000 |
| FAR AND WISE INC | $5,000 |
| PHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| BROTHERS FOR LIFE | $5,000 |
| BETH DAVID REFORM CONGREGATION | $4,000 |
| SUN VALLEY MUSIC FESTIVAL | $3,000 |
| THE LENFEST INST FOR JOURNALISM SPE ASSET FUND OF | $2,500 |
| INTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS | $2,000 |
| GERMANTOWN FRIENDS SCHOOL | $1,845 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
45 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
SUN VALLEY WRITERS' CONFERENCE INC8× · 2017–2025 · $56k · revenue +32%
BARNARD COLLEGE4× · 2018–2025 · $46k · revenue +16%- PMPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART5× · 2017–2025 · $25k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- ALANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUEgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $53k · revenue +28%
- CCCOLUMBIA COLLEGE OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITYone grant, 2017 · $50k
- CUCORNELL UNIVERSITY - CORNELL LAW SCHOOLone grant, 2018 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…
We are chicago's jesuit, catholic university - a diverse community seeking god in all things and working to expand knowledge in the service of humanity through learning, justice, and faith.
The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids First Chicago for Education and the most unlike its peers is Theatre Ariel. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
98 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 98 of the 120 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SUN VALLEY CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds SUN VALLEY WRITERS' CONFERENCE INC ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds BARNARD COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds INTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds The Community Library Association Inc ↗
- Who funds FARWISE INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds Brothers for Life ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY ↗
- Who funds THE LENFEST INSTITUTE FOR JOURNALISM SPECIAL ASSET FUND OF TPF ↗
- Who funds FOREIGN POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds BRYN MAWR REHABILITATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC ↗
- Who funds University of Chicago ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Parkinson Foundation of the National Capital Area ↗
- Who funds LESLIE SHANKMAN SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds MANNA FOOD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE PENNSYLVANIA BALLET ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds Wood River Community Young Men's Christian Association Inc ↗
- Who funds ROCKVILLE BASEBALL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP RAMAH IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds Northwestern University ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Spur Community Foundation Inc · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Boswell Family Foundation · Circle of Service Foundation · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · The Lehman Foundation · L & H Foundation · The Nalen Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Judith and Marshall Meyer Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Manna Food Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- Connecticut College — 0% of income from government
- Comfort Cases Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.