Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Judelson Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$390k
Granted FY2024still arriving
49
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$73k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$273kEducation$222kPhilanthropy$107kHealth$37kFood & Nutrition$27kAnimals$23kEnvironment$23kInternational$17kOther$0
02FY2024 · 49 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k36 grants · $146k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $172k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $73k
$5,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$8.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST$72,623
YALE UNIVERSITY DEVELOPMENT$25,000
LOS ANGELES MUSEUM OF ART$25,000
DEERFIELD ACADEMY$17,000
BROWN UNIVERSITY$15,000
ARTISTS SPACE$13,000
FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE$12,500
DIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS$12,000
SWISS INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART$12,000
CHIKAMING OPEN LANDS$10,000
WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART$10,000
NOURISHING HOPE$10,000
LINCOLN PARK ZOO$10,000
SKILLS FOR CHICAGOLANDS FUTURE$7,500
GOODMAN THEATRE$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE ARTHUR PROJECT: $250 → 17%RX ART: $10k → 17%RX ART: $8k → 17%RX ART: $3k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
PA
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
MD
AZ
NC
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$535k · 46 repeat orgs$99k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against -12% for those funded once.

46 repeat relationships: 34 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
21

Total granted

$535k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
-12%

Still filing today

70%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Arizona Foundation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +109%
  • TO
    TRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY
    6× · 2018–2024 · $31k · revenue +77%
  • AS
    ARTISTS SPACE INC
    4× · 2017–2024 · $29k · revenue +259%

Funded once

  • TD
    THE DESERT BIENNIAL DBA DESERT X
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -35%
  • SI
    SWISS INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -21%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ARTISTS SPACE
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
2
Chicago Opera Theater

Chicago opera theater expands the tradition of opera as a living art form by engaging lovers of music and storytelling through innovative experiences, predominantly of new and rarely performed works.

Arts & Culture
3
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
4
Lookingglass Theatre Company

Lookingglass theatre company is a national leader in the creation and presentation of innovative, cutting-edge theatrical work. lookingglass interweaves movement, circus arts and narrative in original and captivating ways. guided by an…

Arts & Culture
5
New York Studio School

The new york studio school is committed to giving a significant education to the aspiring artist, a preamble to a lifetime's engagement in drawing, painting, and sculpture. (see schedule o for continuation)

—
6
Institute of Contemporary Art Miami Inc

The institute of contemporary art, miami (ica miami), is dedicated to promoting the work of contemporary artists, and to the exchange of art and ideas throughout the miami region and internationally. through an energetic calendar of…

Arts & Culture
7
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
8
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
9
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
11
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
12
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Museum of Manhattan; the most unlike its peers is The Joe Namath Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
53/54
Grantees still filing
36/54
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARTISTS SPACE INC: $29,000 · Arts & CultureARTISTS SPACE INCWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $27,500 · Arts & CultureWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ARTMUSEUM ASSOCIATES: $25,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM ASSOCIATESDIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureDIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INCDALLAS CONTEMPORARY: $20,000 · Arts & CultureDALLAS CONTEMPORARYTHE INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC: $18,611 · Arts & CultureTHE INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART…GRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · Arts & CultureGRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATIONTHE FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE INC: $12,500 · Arts & CultureTHE FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE INCTHE DESERT BIENNIAL DBA DESERT X: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCHICAGO THEATRE GROUP INC: $9,000 · Arts & CulturePERFORMA INC: $8,000 · Arts & Culture+11 more: $37,850 · Arts & Culture+11 moreYALE UNIVERSITY DEVELOPMENT: $40,000 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITY DEVELOPMENTSWISS INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $17,755 · OtherSWISS INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ARTLAKEVIEW FOOD PANTRY: $15,000 · OtherLAKEVIEW FOOD PANTRYSACRED HEART SCHOOLS: $13,000 · Other4TH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $11,500 · OtherNOURISHING HOPE: $11,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS: $10,250 · OtherRX ART INC: $20,500 · OtherRX ART INCPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $11,500 · OtherSKILLS FOR CHICAGO: $10,000 · OtherDEBORAH'S PLACE: $9,500 · Other+34 more: $78,979 · Other+34 moreNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $106,089 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTH…IMPACT GRANTS CHICAGO: $12,500 · PhilanthropyIMPACT GRANTS CHI…+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $40,000 · EducationUniversity of…TRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY: $30,750 · EducationTRUSTEES OF D…THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $8,100 · EducationTHE ART INSTI…JUILLIARD SCHOOL: $5,500 · EducationJUILLIARD SCH…AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $4,000 · Education+3 more: $5,000 · Education+3 moreBROWN UNIVERSITY: $49,500 · Community ImprovementLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $22,500 · AnimalsCHIKAMING OPEN LANDS: $17,500 · EnvironmentKEEP INDIANAPOLIS BEAUTIFUL INC: $5,000 · Environment
Arts & Culture$232,461Other$248,984Philanthropy$119,589Education$93,350Community Improvement$49,500Animals$22,500Environment$22,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $106,089 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $49,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY: $30,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetARTISTS SPACE INC: $29,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $27,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM ASSOCIATES: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $22,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetRX ART INC: $20,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetDIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS CONTEMPORARY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC: $18,611 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHIKAMING OPEN LANDS: $17,500 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetGRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetIMPACT GRANTS CHICAGO: $12,500 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $11,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNOURISHING HOPE: $11,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DESERT BIENNIAL DBA DESERT X: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSKILLS FOR CHICAGO: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDEBORAH'S PLACE: $9,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO THEATRE GROUP INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $8,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPERFORMA INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMary Meyer School: $7,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetTIMELINE THEATRE COMPANY: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHUBBARD STREET DANCE CHICAGO: $5,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJUILLIARD SCHOOL: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTONO FESTIVAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetSWISS INSTITUTE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEMPOWERS AFRICA INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetKEEP INDIANAPOLIS BEAUTIFUL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HEWITT SCHOOL: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLyric Opera of Chicago: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWHITE COLUMNS INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SILVER SHIELD FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHV3 FOUNDATION: $1,350 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JOE NAMATH CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLITTLE BIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVictory Gardens Theater: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMBER WAVES FARM INC: $714 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds ARTISTS SPACE INC ↗
  • Who funds WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM ASSOCIATES ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds RX ART INC ↗
  • Who funds DIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS CONTEMPORARY ↗
  • Who funds THE INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC ↗
  • Who funds CHIKAMING OPEN LANDS ↗
  • Who funds GRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT GRANTS CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds NOURISHING HOPE ↗
  • Who funds THE DESERT BIENNIAL DBA DESERT X ↗
  • Who funds SKILLS FOR CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds DEBORAH'S PLACE ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO THEATRE GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds PERFORMA INC ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Symphony Orchestra ↗
  • Who funds Mary Meyer School ↗
  • Who funds TIMELINE THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds HUBBARD STREET DANCE CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds JUILLIARD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds TONO FESTIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SWISS INSTITUTE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Quinn Family FoundationIL20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 5 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Quinn Family Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Marieluise Hessel Foundation · The Dorothea Lleonhardt Foundation Inc · Via Art Fund Inc · Arison Arts Foundation · May and Samuel Rudin Family Foundation Inc · The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc · Lloyd a Fry Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Judelson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Judelson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • The Institute of Contemporary Art Inc: 1% of income from government
  • The Filmmakers Collaborative Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Judelson Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Judelson Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 82 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Judelson Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph