· Private foundation
The Joseph Leroy and Ann C Warner Fund Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 50% of THE JOSEPH LEROY AND ANN C WARNER FUND INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $32k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $290k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $325k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ALLAIRE COMMUNITY FARM | $150,000 |
| THE VISCARDI CENTER INC | $75,000 |
| SPENCE-CHAPIN SERVICES TO FAMILY AND CHILDREN | $50,000 |
| CITY LIVING | $50,000 |
| BROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC | $40,000 |
| A BETTER COLLEGE POINT CIVIC ASSOCIATION | $40,000 |
| SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES | $30,000 |
| NEW JERSEY YOUTH CAMPS | $30,000 |
| AT THE TABLE INC | $25,000 |
| THE FELIX ORGANIZATION | $25,000 |
| THE STUTTERING ASSOCIATION FOR THE YOUNG SAY | $20,000 |
| SHAMES JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ON THE HUDSON | $15,000 |
| CONNECTIONS MENTORING INC | $15,000 |
| BEST BUDDIES | $15,000 |
| YOUTH COMMUNICATION NEW YORK CENTER INC | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 25% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
28 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $138k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TVTHE VISCARDI CENTER INC2× · 2023–2024 · $150k · revenue +56%
SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC5× · 2019–2024 · $140k · revenue +32%- RVROCCOS VOICE FOR AUTISM CORP2× · 2022–2023 · $120k · revenue +8% · 58% of their budget
Funded once
- NCNY COMMUNITY TRUSTone grant, 2019 · $75k
- CLCITY LIVING NY INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +41%
- ABA BETTER COLLEGE POINTone grant, 2022 · $40k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The child center of ny strengthens children and families with skills, opportunities, and emotional support to build healthy, successful lives.
We are committed to helping people with intellectual (cont. on schedule o) and developmental disabilities to live full lives.
To provide quality programs for young children with special needs.
The center's mission is to help children and adults with differing abilities achieve their dreams by overcoming barriers to living, working, learning & enjoying recreational opportunities in the community of their choice.
Little flower is committed to improving the well-being of the children, families, and individuals with developmental disabilities across nyc and long island so they can reach their full potential. little flower transforms caring into…
Sco family of services works with new york's most vulnerable - those striving to overcome the devastating impact of poverty, neglect, abuse or developmental and mental challenges. we respond to moments of crisis and prevent crises before…
Build the capacity and skills of individuals, families, community agencies and professionals to help individuals with an autism spectrum disorder realize oppurtunities for independence, self-reliance and successful community inclusion.…
Empowering people through innovative solutions, one person at a time.
For over 150 years, st. vincent's services, inc. (d/b/a heartshare st. vincent's services) has been a symbol of hope, compassion, and strength for vulnerable and under-resourced communities in new york city. (see on schedule o)
Bigs & littles nyc mentoring is a nonprofit community-based organization which transforms the lives of vulnerable nyc children and strengthens families through professionally guided one-to-one mentoring, life skills programming, and…
To provide a program for children with special needs, ages three to five years by utilizing the disciplines of psychology, speech therapy, occupational therapy, and physical therapy as integral functions of the educational program.
Provide social, legal & behavioral health services to individuals and families affected by life-altering events.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University Settlement Society of New York and the most unlike its peers is Roccos Voice for Autism Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ALLAIRE COMMUNITY FARM A NJ NONPROFIT CO ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC ↗
- Who funds THE VISCARDI CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds ROCCOS VOICE FOR AUTISM CORP ↗
- Who funds MERCY CENTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds NEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds THE POSSIBILITY PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH COMMUNICATION NY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GRAHAM WINDHAM ↗
- Who funds FELIX ORGANIZATION - ADOPTEES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds AT THE TABLE INC ↗
- Who funds CITY LIVING NY INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR FACIAL RECONSTRUCTION INC ↗
- Who funds A BETTER COLLEGE POINT CIVIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds WEST END RESIDENCES HDFC INC DBA HOMEWARD NYC ↗
- Who funds KAISER'S ROOM INC ↗
- Who funds INTREPID MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds YOU GOTTA BELIEVE - THE OLDER CHILD ADOPTION & PERMANENCY MOVEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds HOOKED ON FISHING CHARTERS INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ON THE HUDSON INC ↗
- Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT SOCIETY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds TOURETTE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Pinkerton Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Brooklyn Community Foundation · The New York Community Trust · The Ira Decamp Foundation Xxxxx2009 · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Redlich Horwitz Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · American Express Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation · Valentine Perry Snyder Fund Xxxxx9001
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Joseph Leroy and Ann C Warner Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Child Focus Inc — 29% of income from government
- Mercy Center Corporation — 21% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.