Skip to content
The Joseph F Umosella Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Joseph F Umosella Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$309k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$235k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.1MHuman Services$585kHealth$487kPhilanthropy$326kHousing & Shelter$180kFood & Nutrition$60kPublic Benefit$40kYouth Development$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $235k
$8,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$6.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$234,813
NO PERSON LEFT BEHIND OUTDOORS$25,000
CHILDREN HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA$15,000
ALS FOUNDATION$10,000
THE GREEN BERET FOUNDATION$8,000
NOREASTER NICKS RAINY DAY FUND$7,000
WIGS AND WISHES$5,000
CHAPTER 66 DAV AUXILLARY$2,500
FOREVER LOGAN STRONG$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $118k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 49% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%FRIENDS ASSOCIATION: $30k → 6%LITTLE SAINT NICK FOUNDATION: $30k → 6%THE GREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $10k → 16%CATHEDRAL KITCHEN: $30k → 12%THE GREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $10k → 16%THE GREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $8k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
DE
TN
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

33%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$778k · 14 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
40

Total granted

$778k
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+12%

Still filing today

50%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationInternationalPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GB
    GREEN BERET FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $28k · revenue +54%
  • HH
    HAMMONTON HAWKS INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +806% · 26% of their budget
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • ID
    IMPACTASSETS DONOR ADVISED FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $326k
  • DV
    DELAWARE VALLEY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $200k
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITYgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $150k · revenue +166%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
2
Huntington's Disease Foundation

To fund transformative research to find treatments, and ultimately a cure, for huntington's disease.

Health
3
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
4
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital Inc

Mission: johns hopkins all children's hospital (all children's), a member of johns hopkins medicine, strives to provide the highest quality care to improve the health of our entire community through innovation, collaboration, service…

Health
5
Humc Medical Observation Pa

To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.

—
6
Hackensack Meridian Health Inc-Subordinates

The organizations are committed to providing the full spectrum of life-enhancing care and services to create and sustain healthy, vibrant communities. please refer to schedule h, part vi, question 5 for the organization's community benefit…

Health
7
Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals

Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
8
Variety Children's Hospital

To inspire hope and promote lifelong health by providing the best care to every child.

Health
9
Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh Foundation

Children's hospital of pittsburgh foundation is the sole fundraising arm of upmc children's hospital of pittsburgh.the foundation exists to provide financial support for the hospital's mission of improving the health and well-being of…

Health
10
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
11
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
12
The Michael J Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research

The foundation is dedicated to finding a cure for parkinson's disease through an aggressively funded research agenda and ensuring the development of improved therapies for those living with parkinson's today.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Green Beret Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Pigeon Key Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IMPACTASSETS DONOR ADVISED FUND: $326,000 · OtherIMPACTASSETS DONOR ADVISED FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $325,169 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDELAWARE VALLEY COLLEGE: $200,000 · OtherDELAWARE VALLEY COLLEGEHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $150,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYTHE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENSYLVANIA: $130,000 · OtherTHE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENSYLVANIAATLANTICARE HEALTH PARK - HAMMONTON: $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PENN: $95,278 · OtherST JOSEPH ACADEMY INC: $80,000 · Other+33 more: $554,900 · Other+33 moreTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $545,909 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERS…VALLEY FORGE MILITARY ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Education+2 more: $30,000 · EducationWIGS AND WISHES: $35,000 · HealthCherry Hill Free Clinic Inc: $30,000 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $20,000 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Association: $20,000 · HealthHAMMONTON CANCER FOUNDATION: $15,000 · HealthALS UNITED MID-ATLANTIC: $5,000 · HealthFRIENDS ASSOCIATION FOR THE CARE AND PRO: $30,000 · Human ServicesLITTLE SAINT NICK FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesTHE CATHEDRAL SOUP KITCHEN INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesGREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $28,000 · Human ServicesVILLAGES IN PARTNERSHIP INC: $15,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,000 · InternationalGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc: $20,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,961,347Education$605,909Health$125,000Human Services$118,000International$25,000Philanthropy$20,000Food & Nutrition$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $545,909 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWIGS AND WISHES: $35,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetFRIENDS ASSOCIATION FOR THE CARE AND PRO: $30,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCherry Hill Free Clinic Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetLITTLE SAINT NICK FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetVALLEY FORGE MILITARY ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CATHEDRAL SOUP KITCHEN INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUsher Syndrome Society Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetGREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $28,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAMMONTON HAWKS INC: $20,000 over 4y, 26% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAMMONTON CANCER FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetVILLAGES IN PARTNERSHIP INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAMMONTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetPIGEON KEY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSTARLIGHT CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALS UNITED MID-ATLANTIC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOREVER LOGAN STRONG: $2,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds WIGS AND WISHES ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS ASSOCIATION FOR THE CARE AND PRO ↗
  • Who funds Cherry Hill Free Clinic Inc ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SAINT NICK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY FORGE MILITARY ACADEMY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CATHEDRAL SOUP KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Usher Syndrome Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREEN BERET FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HAMMONTON HAWKS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds HAMMONTON CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGES IN PARTNERSHIP INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oceanfirst FoundationTd Charitable Foundat…Community Foundation …Chubb Charitable Foun…Verizon FoundationCharities Aid Foundat…The Pfizer Foundation…The Blackbaud Giving …American Endowment Fo…Paypal Charitable Giv…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…
Oceanfirst FoundationNJ13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oceanfirst Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Joseph F Umosella Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Joseph F Umosella Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    7get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Joseph F Umosella Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Joseph F Umosella Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Joseph F Umosella Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home