Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Joseph & Shirley Peterson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$34kEducation$29kYouth Development$20kHousing & Shelter$14kReligion$11kCommunity Improvement$4kArts & Culture$1kHuman Services$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$220k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL MS SOCIETY$5,000
LOS ANGELES MISSION$3,000
UNIVERISTY OF THE NATIONS KONA$3,000
PHOS LIFE MINISTRIES$1,500
ADVENTURES IN MISSIONS$700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
OR
PA
CA
CO
SC
DC
HI
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$104k · 13 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
15

Total granted

$104k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-8%
+64%

Still filing today

38%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthReligionEducationHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS KONA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $29k · revenue +28%
  • YW
    YOUTH WITH A MISSION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $20k
  • NM
    NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $15k

Funded once

  • FC
    FIREPOINT CHURCH INC
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • CC
    CALVARY CHAPEL CHINO HILLS
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Paul White Ministries

Present the gospel

Religion
2
Christian Ministries International
—
3
Leckrone Ministries Inc

Evangelist work

Religion
4
The Rock Ministries

To preach the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ to the Nations

Human Services
5
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
6
International Christian Publishers

Religious corp, charitable, educational and cultural, conduct all activities relate to publishingchristian literature

Religion
7
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
8
Follow Him Media Inc
Religion
9
The Word and Song Ministries Inc

The word and song ministries, inc. intervines god's holy word with songs that give evidence to the truth of his word, seeking to glorify the heavenly father and make disciples of the believers of his son, our lord jesus christ.

Religion
10
Plain Truth Ministries Worldwide

Ptm worldwide publishes christianity without the religion magazine and plain truth magazine. ptm further serves with daily radio programs, blogs, bible surveys and many other free inspirational resources on its website, www.ptm.org

Religion
11
Daily Audio Bible

Daily podcast of bible readings in multiple languages

Religion
12
Jesusonline Ministries

The mission of jesusonline is to use internet technologies to help people throughout the world discover who jesus is, trust him as lord and savior, follow him wholeheartedly and share him with others.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Los Angeles Mission Inc; the most unlike its peers is Song of Israel. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YOUTH WITH A MISSION: $20,250 · OtherYOUTH WITH A MISSIONNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $15,000 · OtherNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETYNATIONAL MS SOCIETY: $10,000 · OtherNATIONAL MS SOCIETYFRONTIER VENTURES: $4,000 · OtherFRONTIER VENTURESLEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOC: $3,000 · Other+15 more: $14,700 · Other+15 moreUNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS KONA INC: $28,750 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS K…LOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $13,000 · Housing & ShelterLOS ANGELES …BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $3,000 · HealthCONVALESCENT AID SOCIETY: $2,000 · HealthSTANDING STONE MINISTRIES INC: $500 · HealthSONG OF ISRAEL: $1,500 · ReligionELIJAH LIST MINISTRIES INC: $500 · ReligionDUTCH SHEETS MINISTRIES INC: $500 · ReligionWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$66,950Education$28,750Housing & Shelter$13,000Health$5,500Religion$2,500Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS KONA INC: $28,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $13,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCONVALESCENT AID SOCIETY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSONG OF ISRAEL: $1,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELIJAH LIST MINISTRIES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUTCH SHEETS MINISTRIES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS KONA INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds CONVALESCENT AID SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SONG OF ISRAEL ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ELIJAH LIST MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds STANDING STONE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds DUTCH SHEETS MINISTRIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS16.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Joseph & Shirley Peterson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Joseph & Shirley Peterson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joseph & Shirley Peterson Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph