· Private foundation
The Jon and Mary Shirley Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $28k
- $10k–50k23 grants · $533k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $903k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE HILL SCHOOL OFFICE OF ADVANCEMENT | $600,000 |
| CALDER FOUNDATION | $415,405 |
| NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN FUND | $250,000 |
| SEATTLE ART MUSEUM | $248,438 |
| UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY | $100,000 |
| HENRY GALLERY ASSOCIATION UW | $100,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL SCULPTURE CENTER | $55,000 |
| SEATTLE AQUARIUM | $50,000 |
| SEATTLE UNIVERSITY | $50,000 |
| KNKX | $50,000 |
| VETSAID | $50,000 |
| THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART | $50,000 |
| AMERICARES FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| CASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA | $50,000 |
| NATIONAL REDISTRICTING FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 5% of The Jon and Mary Shirley Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 52% of the giving stays in WA; read by stated purpose it is 44% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
70 repeat relationships — 40 still active in FY2024, 30 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SASEATTLE ART MUSEUM8× · 2017–2024 · $7.7M · revenue +0%
- WMWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART8× · 2017–2024 · $825k · revenue +161%
- THTHE HENRY GALLERY ASSOCIATION INC7× · 2017–2024 · $375k · revenue +37%
Funded once
- THTHE HILL SCHOOLgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $1.1M · revenue +44%
THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue -32%- HFHISPANIC FOUNDATION UNIDOS DISASTER RELIEF FUNDone grant, 2018 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The museum of northwest art collects, preserves, interprets and exhibits art created in the pacific northwest, supports artists, and strives to integrate art into the lives of all people. the museum is free and open to the public seven…
To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.
The Seattle Architecture Foundation connects people to the architecture, design, and history of Seattle. We believe the more you engage with design, the more you feel connected to your changing city. As a volunteer driven organization, we…
Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The asian art museum celebrates, preserves, and promotes asian and asian american art and cultures for local and global audiences. we provide a dynamic forum for exchanging ideas, inviting collaboration, and fueling imagination to deepen…
See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…
Seattle academy is a dynamic community that challenges students to question, imagine, and create in order to contribute to a changing world.
To enliven and expand the understanding of craft and the museum experience for all.
The mission of the portland art museum is to engage diverse communities through art and film of enduring quality, and to collect, preserve and educate for the enrichment of present and future generations.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Art Museum and the most unlike its peers is Calder Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
87 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 87 of the 119 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SEATTLE ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY ↗
- Who funds THE HILL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CALDER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART ↗
- Who funds Museum of Modern Art ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Artist Trust ↗
- Who funds THE HENRY GALLERY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
- Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE SEATTLE TIMES COMMUNITY IMPACT FUND ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL SCULPTURE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds TATE AMERICAS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
- Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds National Gallery of Art ↗
- Who funds ARTSFUND ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL ARTS & ARTISTS INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL REDISTRICTING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MAUI FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds Pebble Beach Company Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE SEATTLE AQUARIUM SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE RONALD COASE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds ORCA RELIEF CITIZENS ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds PRATT FINE ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds GAGE ACADEMY OF ART ↗
- Who funds HOPEWELL FUND ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds VETSAID INC ↗
- Who funds Fuse Innovation Fund ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC NORTHWEST BALLET ASSOCIATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Artsfund · The Conru Foundation · The Bernstein Family Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Klorfine Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Grousemont Foundation · Glassybaby White Light Fund · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · Puget Sound Energy Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Jon and Mary Shirley Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.