Skip to content

· Private foundation

The John M & Nancy S Murphy Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$66kCrime & Legal$15kHuman Services$13kInternational$12kHealth$11kHousing & Shelter$10kYouth Development$8kReligion$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$857k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST ROSE OF LIMA SCHOOL INC$10,000
THE CENTER FOR EMPOWERMENT AND EDUCATION INC$5,000
THE WATER PROJECT INC$5,000
ST CATHERINE CENTER FOR SPECIAL NEEDS INC$5,000
CROSS CATHOLIC OUTREACH INC$5,000
MALTA HOUSE INC$2,500
INNOCENCE PROJECT INC$2,500
FAITH FOOD PANTRY OF NEWTOWN INC$2,500
HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM FOUNDATION$2,500
JERICHO PARTNERSHIP INC$2,500
DEERFIELD VALLEY FOOD PANTRY INCORPORATED$2,500
MALTA CAMP USA INC$2,500
ABILITY BEYOND DISABILITY$1,000
WILMINGTON WORKS INC$1,000
MISSION SANTA MARIA INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $3k → 17%TEARS FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $1k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
WA
IL
NY
MA
NJ
CT
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$145k · 15 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
2

Total granted

$145k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+27%

Still filing today

73%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionInternationalHousing & ShelterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    THE WATER PROJECT INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $12k · revenue +14%
  • TC
    The Center For Empowerment And Education Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $10k · revenue +28%
  • MH
    MALTA HOUSE INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $10k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • TF
    Tears Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -39%
  • RM
    Ronald McDonald House Globalgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Vincent Depaul Mission of Waterbury

The st. vincent depaul mission of waterbury, inc., through its network of services, aids, supports and empowers people experiencing poverty, homelessness, hunger, and mental health challenges so they may recover with dignity and develop…

Health
2
St Vincent Depaul Middletown

St. vincent depaul middletown (svdm) was founded in 1980 by the sisters of mercy and the catholic diocese of norwich. svdm's mission is to provide food, shelter and basic human services to poor and homeless individuals regardless of race,…

—
3
Inspirica Inc

Inspirica is one of the largest providers of emergency housing, permanent supportive housing and support services in connecticut. each night, we house over 500 people including children. we operate 12 facilities in stamford and provide an…

—
4
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Fall River Massachusetts Inc

Anchored in faith our mission is to emvrace the dignity of evry individual by fostering empowerment resilience opportunity and hope

—
5
Mercy Housing & Shelter Corporation

Mercy housing and shelter corporation provides housing assistance and supportive services to persons who are homeless or at risk of becoming homeless. mercy works to empower its clients to become independent, so they may live and work with…

Housing & Shelter
6
Catholic Charities of Buffalo

For 100 years, catholic charities of buffalo has been providing hope for the most vulnerable and in need in our community. catholic charities is one of the most comprehensive human services organizations serving all eight counties of…

Philanthropy
7
Cathedral Center Inc

Cathedral center's mission is to provide a safe environment for women and families, while working to end homelessness one life at a time. the cathedral center serves unaccompanied women and families with children who are homeless or…

Religion
8
Catholic Charitable Bureau of the Archdiocese of Boston Inc

Catholic charities' mission is to welcome and serve, with compassion and respect, all those in need by providing life's necessities, education, and advocacy to move families toward self sufficiency. catholic charities boston is one of the…

—
9
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Pgh

Catholic charities serves to not only meet the immediate needs of the vulnerable within our communities but to provide solutions that embrace a path to stability for those we are privileged to serve. catholic charities is the primary…

Human Services
10
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
11
Womens Resource Center of Newport and Bristol Counties

The women's resource center empowers survivors by providing trauma-informed services with equity and compassion while working collaboratively with the community to eliminate the root causes of interpersonal abuse.

Human Services
12
Catholic Charities Inc Archdiocese of Hartford

Mission: reflecting god's love, we partner with all to strengthen families and inspire people to achieve their fullest potential.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of Fairfield County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Malta Camp Usa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST ROSE OF LIMA SCHOOL INC: $66,000 · OtherST ROSE OF LIMA SCHOOL INCThe Center For Empowerment And Education Inc: $10,000 · OtherThe Center For Empowerment And Education IncCROSS CATHOLIC OUTREACH INC: $7,000 · OtherCROSS CATHOLIC OUTREACH INCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC: $6,500 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INCST CATHERINE CENTER FOR SPECIAL NEEDS INC: $6,000 · OtherST CATHERINE CENTER FOR SPECIAL NEEDS INC+4 more: $9,600 · Other+4 moreTHE WATER PROJECT INC: $12,000 · InternationalMALTA HOUSE INC: $9,500 · Housing & ShelterTears Foundation: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $4,500 · Human ServicesJERICHO PARTNERSHIP INC: $4,500 · Community ImprovementWILMINGTON WORKS INC: $3,000 · Community ImprovementDEERFIELD VALLEY FOOD PANTRY INC: $3,500 · Food & NutritionFAITH FOOD PANTRY: $2,500 · Food & NutritionMALTA CAMP USA INC: $3,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$105,100International$12,000Housing & Shelter$9,500Human Services$9,500Community Improvement$7,500Food & Nutrition$6,000Recreation & Sports$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE WATER PROJECT INC: $12,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Center For Empowerment And Education Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMALTA HOUSE INC: $9,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST CATHERINE CENTER FOR SPECIAL NEEDS INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTears Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetJERICHO PARTNERSHIP INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMALTA CAMP USA INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMISSION SANTA MARIA: $3,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetDEERFIELD VALLEY FOOD PANTRY INC: $3,500 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetWILMINGTON WORKS INC: $3,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetRonald McDonald House Global: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of Saint John of Jerusalem of RhodesNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of Saint John of Jerusalem of Rhodes · Synchrony Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The John M & Nancy S Murphy Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The John M & Nancy S Murphy Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Wilmington Works Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Jericho Partnership Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John M & Nancy S Murphy’s filings →

More from the funding graph