Skip to content
The John Lazarich Foundation Wm Kronenberg & J Sacchetta Trustees at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

The John Lazarich Foundation Wm Kronenberg & J Sacchetta Trustees

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$586k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$386k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$726kHealth$523kEnvironment$140kEducation$131kAnimals$130kInternational$75kYouth Development$56kReligion$31kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $78k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $112k
  • $250k+1 grant · $386k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GATEWAY HOUSING GROUP INC$385,928
WHALE TRUST$62,000
CAMPHILL SOLTANE$50,000
STROUD WATER RESEACH CENTER$25,000
CHESTER COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$17,500
PHILADELPHIA OUTWARD BOUND$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF PHILADELPHIS$10,000
HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL$5,000
GRACE CROSSING COMMUNITY CHURCH$2,000
MALVERN PREPARATORY SCHOOL$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
WETLANDS INSTITUTE$1,000
CAMP DREAMCATCHER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 19% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%INDEPENDENCE MISSION SCHOOLS: $3k → 7%DCCC EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%PHILADELPHIA OUTWARD BOUND: $25k → 22%WHALE TRUST: $62k → 9%FRANSCISCAN SISTERS OF ATONEMENT: $25k → 6%HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 17%DCCC EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%PHILADELPHIA OUTWARD BOUND: $15k → 22%WHALE TRUST: $62k → 9%HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 17%PHILADELPHIA OUTWARD BOUND: $15k → 22%HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 17%STROUD WATEWR RESEACH CENTER: $35k → 6%PHILADELPHIA OUTWARD BOUND: $15k → 22%HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 17%STROUD WATER RESEACH CENTER: $25k → 6%PHILADELPHIA OUTWARD BOUND: $15k → 22%HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 17%STROUD WATEWR RESEACH CENTER: $25k → 6%WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF PHILADELPHIS: $10k → 22%STROUD WATER RESEACH CENTER: $25k → 6%WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF PHILADELPHIS: $10k → 22%STROUD WATER RESEACH CENTER: $25k → 6%WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF PHILADELPHIS: $10k → 22%CHESTER COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $63k → 6%WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF PHILADELPHIS: $10k → 22%CHESTER COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $63k → 6%WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF PHILADELPHIS: $10k → 22%CHESTER COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $63k → 6%CHESTER COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $63k → 6%CHESTER COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $18k → 6%GATEWAY HOUSING GROUP INC: $386k → 6%GATEWAY HOUSING GROUP INC: $155k → 6%GATEWAY HOUSING GROUP INC: $85k → 6%GATEWAY HOUSING GROUP INC: $80k → 6%GATEWAY HOUSING GROUP INC: $20k → 6%CAMPHILL SOLTANE: $50k → 6%CAMPHILL SOLTANE: $50k → 6%CAMPHILL SOLTANE: $50k → 6%CAMPHILL SOLTANE: $50k → 6%CAMPHILL SOLTANE: $50k → 6%PHOENIXVILLE PAL: $10k → 6%PHOENIXVILLE PAL: $10k → 6%PHOENIXVILLE PAL: $10k → 6%PHOENIXVILLE PAL: $10k → 6%PHOENIXVILLE PAL: $10k → 6%MOM'S HOUSE: $3k → 6%MOM'S HOUSE: $3k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 18 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
5

Total granted

$1.8M
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+19%

Still filing today

72%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthScience & TechYouth DevelopmentInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    GATEWAY HOUSING GROUP
    5× · 2020–2024 · $726k · revenue +535% · 61% of their budget
  • CS
    CAMPHILL SOLTANE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $250k · revenue +12%
  • SW
    STROUD WATER RESEARCH CENTER
    5× · 2020–2024 · $135k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • FS
    FRANSCISCAN SISTERS OF ATONEMENT
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • IM
    INDEPENDENCE MISSION SCHOOLSgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +25%
  • CY
    COATESVILLE YOUTH INITIATIVE
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

—
2
Mastery Charter High School

All students learn the academic and personal skills they need to be truly prepared for postsecondary success and able to pursue their dreams.

Education
3
Philips Academy Charter School Inc

Our mission is to inspire diverse learners in a rigorous and innovative environment that cultivates resilient leadership, intellectual curiosity, and thoughtful stewardship.

Education
4
Valley Day School

Valley day school is a private, non-profit, state-funded, special education school licensed by the pennsylvania department of education for students who are experiencing learning and/or adjustment difficulties.

—
5
Gillingham Charter School

To further education quality in pottsville, pa.

Education
6
The Hillside School

The mission of the hillside school is to maximize the potential of children with learning disabilities through excellence in education.

—
7
The Public School of Germantown

Germantown academy inspires students to be independent in thought; confident in expression; compassionate in spirit; collaborative in action; and honorable in deed. germantown academy is a private school educating students from pre-k…

Education
8
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
9
The Grayson School

The grayson school provides gifted children a challenging, research-based education worthy of their intellect and their intrinsic desire to learn and think deeply. we serve as a valued resource for the gifted education community in…

Education
10
Chapel Hill-Chauncy Hall School

We engage a diverse community of learners in a collaborative educational experience, preparing them for college success and a lifetime of meaningful engagement with the broader world.

—
11
The Pennsylvania Horticultural Society

Founded in 1827, the pennsylvania horticultural society (phs) uses horticulture to advance the health and well-being of the greater philadelphia region. (continued in sch o)phs's work focuses on four impact priorities: creating healthy…

Environment
12
Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stroud Water Research Center; the most unlike its peers is Historical Society of the Phoenixville Area. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
16/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GATEWAY HOUSING GROUP: $725,928 · Housing & ShelterGATEWAY HOUSING GROUPCHESTER COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $267,500 · HealthCHESTER COUNTY H…+1 more: $5,000 · HealthSTROUD WATER RESEARCH CENTER: $135,000 · Science & TechSTROUD WATER RES…WHALE TRUST: $130,000 · Science & TechWHALE TRUSTCAMPHILL SOLTANE: $250,000 · EducationCAMPHILL SOLTAN…+2 more: $7,500 · EducationIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherDCCC EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $35,000 · OtherFRANSCISCAN SISTERS OF ATONEMENT: $25,000 · OtherMOM'S HOUSE: $10,000 · OtherGRACECROSSING COMMUNITY CHURCH: $6,273 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherTHE WETLANDS INSTITUTE: $5,000 · Other+2 more: $3,500 · OtherPHILADELPHIA OUTWARD BOUND CENTER: $85,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentWORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF PHILADELPHIA: $50,000 · InternationalHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $25,000 · InternationalHISTORIC YELLOW SPRINGS INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureHISTORICAL SOCIETY OF THE PHOENIXVILLE AREA: $500 · Arts & Culture
Housing & Shelter$725,928Health$272,500Science & Tech$265,000Education$257,500Other$139,773Youth Development$86,000International$75,000Arts & Culture$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGATEWAY HOUSING GROUP: $725,928 over 5y, 61% of budgetCHESTER COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $267,500 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetCAMPHILL SOLTANE: $250,000 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetSTROUD WATER RESEARCH CENTER: $135,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetWHALE TRUST: $130,000 over 5y, 9.3% of budgetPHILADELPHIA OUTWARD BOUND CENTER: $85,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetWORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF PHILADELPHIA: $50,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMALVERN PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WETLANDS INSTITUTE: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP DREAMCATCHER: $5,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE PILOT SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHISTORIC YELLOW SPRINGS INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetINDEPENDENCE MISSION SCHOOLS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOATESVILLE YOUTH INITIATIVE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITIZEN ADVOCACY OF CHESTER COUNTY: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHISTORICAL SOCIETY OF THE PHOENIXVILLE AREA: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GATEWAY HOUSING GROUP ↗
  • Who funds CHESTER COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAMPHILL SOLTANE ↗
  • Who funds STROUD WATER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WHALE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA OUTWARD BOUND CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds MALVERN PREPARATORY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE WETLANDS INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CAMP DREAMCATCHER ↗
  • Who funds THE PILOT SCHOOL INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC YELLOW SPRINGS INC ↗
  • Who funds INDEPENDENCE MISSION SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds COATESVILLE YOUTH INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds CITIZEN ADVOCACY OF CHESTER COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF THE PHOENIXVILLE AREA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chester County Commun…The Philadelphia Foun…Connelly FoundationThe Pfizer Foundation…The Davenport Family …Cabot-Kjellerup Found…Hankin FoundationHamilton Family Found…Lincoln Financial Fou…Ge Aerospace Foundati…Vanguard Charitable E…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…
Chester County Community FoundationPA17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chester County Community Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · Connelly Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Davenport Family Foundation · Cabot-Kjellerup Foundation · Hankin Foundation · Hamilton Family Foundation · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The John Lazarich Foundation Wm Kronenberg & J Sacchetta Trustees funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The John Lazarich Foundation Wm Kronenberg & J Sacchetta Trustees. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • The Wetlands Institute: 2% of income from government
  • The Pilot School Incorporated: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The John Lazarich Foundation Wm Kronenberg & J Sacchetta Trustees?

Find your warmest path to The John Lazarich Foundation Wm Kronenberg & J Sacchetta Trustees through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John Lazarich Foundation Wm Kronenberg & J Sacchetta Trustees’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home