Skip to content

· Private foundation

The John F Welch Jr Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$596k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$2.5MHealth$2.1MEnvironment$2.0MAnimals$1.4MFood & Nutrition$1.2MYouth Development$335kReligion$113kArts & Culture$111kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $124k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $200k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE$250,000
SANKATY HEAD FOUNDATION$100,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SALEM$50,000
INNTER-CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND$50,000
HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS$48,550
BOSTON HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS PROGRAM$25,000
WOODSTOCK FARM SANCTUARY$20,000
METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART$10,000
GRAHAM WINDHAM$10,000
NATIONAL GREAT PYRENEES RESCUE$10,000
SAVING HOPE ANIMAL RESCUE$5,000
NANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION$5,000
SCONSET TRUST INC$5,000
POUND RIDGE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$2,500
POUND RIDGE POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION INC (PBA)$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $50k → 20%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $10k → 20%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $10k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
AZ
NM
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.4M · 25 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +66% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
25

Total granted

$8.4M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+12%

Still filing today

64%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsRecreation & SportsArts & CultureEnvironmentFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +167%
  • SH
    Scenic Hudson Inc
    3× · 2020–2023 · $1.9M · revenue +66%
  • TG
    THE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • NG
    NYU GROSSMAN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
    one grant, 2022 · $1.1M
  • MF
    MERCY FOR ANIMALS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $102k · revenue 0%
  • FC
    FAMILY CHURCH INC
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
2
Natural Areas Conservancy Inc

The natural areas conservancy champions urban natural areas in new york city and across the nation through innovative research, partnerships, and advocacy. we increase the health and resilience of urban forests and wetlands, catalyze…

Environment
3
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
4
Nassau County Spca Inc

The nassau county society for the prevention of cruelty to animals is a 501(c)(3) organized to protect animals from abuse and neglect.(see schedule o)the nassau county society for the prevention of cruelty to animals is a 501(c)(3)…

Animals
5
New Canaan Land Conservation Trust Inc

The mission of the new canaan land trust is to foster a connection between the new canaan community and its natural resources through the conservation and sustainable stewardship of our open space.

—
6
Animal Rescue Fund of the Hamptons Inc

THE ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS ACTIVELY RESCUES CATS AND DOGS, PROVIDES QUALITY CARE AND OFFERS SANCTUARY UNTIL LOVING HOMES CAN BE FOUND. ARF's work with animals, within our community and throughout the organization is guided by…

Animals
7
Naples Zoo Inc

Naples zoo is accredited by the american zoo & aquarium association (aza) and has numerous animal exhibits placed on its 45-acre site. (continued on schedule o)each exhibit is unique and designed to simulate typical conditions for the…

Animals
8
Animal Care and Control of New York City Inc

Animal care centers of nyc's (acc) mission is to end animal homelessness in nyc.

Animals
9
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
10
New York Animal Agriculture Coalition Inc

The new york animal agriculture coalition is designed to increase the public's understanding and to educate about the animal agriculture and current farming pratices.

Animals
11
The Forest Park Conservancy

To protect and restore the ecological health of forest park and marquam nature park, maintain and enhance their extensive trails networks, promote equitable access, and inspire diverse community appreciation and stewardship of these iconic…

Environment
12
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy for Animals Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Linda Loring Nature Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
21/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NYU GROSSMAN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $1,050,000 · OtherNYU GROSSMAN SCHOOL OF MEDICINEWILLS EYE HEALTH SYSTEM: $957,336 · OtherWILLS EYE HEALTH SYSTEMSANKATY HEAD FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 · OtherSANKATY HEAD FOUNDATION INCNATIONAL GREAT PYRENEES RESCUE: $220,000 · OtherNATIONAL GREAT PYRENEES RESCUECREATURE KIND: $106,000 · Other+24 more: $490,300 · Other+24 moreCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $2,250,907 · Recreation & SportsCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INCBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SALEM INC: $330,000 · Recreation & SportsBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER …+3 more: $5,063 · Recreation & SportsScenic Hudson Inc: $1,876,148 · EnvironmentScenic Hudson Inc+2 more: $45,000 · EnvironmentTHE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC: $1,150,000 · Food & NutritionTHE GOOD FOOD…+1 more: $2,000 · Food & NutritionHumane World for Animals Inc: $475,900 · AnimalsHumane Worl…BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC: $275,000 · AnimalsBIG DOG RAN…MERCY FOR ANIMALS INC: $102,000 · AnimalsMERCY FOR A…WOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $55,000 · AnimalsWOODSTOCK F…THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $48,500 · Animals+3 more: $40,000 · AnimalsMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $58,545 · Arts & CultureFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC: $19,332 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION: $12,500 · Arts & CultureNANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $8,410 · Arts & CultureGRAHAM WINDHAM: $70,000 · Human Services
Other$3,073,636Recreation & Sports$2,585,970Environment$1,921,148Food & Nutrition$1,152,000Animals$996,400Arts & Culture$98,787Human Services$70,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $2,250,907 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetScenic Hudson Inc: $1,876,148 over 3y, 13% of budgetTHE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC: $1,150,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $475,900 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SALEM INC: $330,000 over 6y, 9.9% of budgetBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC: $275,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetSANKATY HEAD FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetMERCY FOR ANIMALS INC: $102,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGRAHAM WINDHAM: $70,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $58,545 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $55,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $48,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAVING HOPE ANIMAL RESCUE FUND: $30,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetNANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budget'SCONSET TRUST INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC: $19,332 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION: $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBerkshire Community College Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetThe Rogosin Institute Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $8,410 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNANTUCKET BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF MIAMI ANIMALS FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCATSKILL ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE LINDA LORING NATURE FOUNDATION INC: $2,063 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNew Roots Institute: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMDRC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNicklaus Children's Health Care Foundation: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROSPECT PARK ALLIANCE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET GOLF CLUB INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds Scenic Hudson Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SALEM INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds SANKATY HEAD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MERCY FOR ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds GRAHAM WINDHAM ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds WOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds INNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SAVING HOPE ANIMAL RESCUE FUND ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds 'SCONSET TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds FACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION ↗
  • Who funds Berkshire Community College Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Rogosin Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MIAMI ANIMALS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CATSKILL ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY12.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The John F Welch Jr Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The John F Welch Jr Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Greater Salem Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Nantucket Historical Association: 1% of income from government
  • Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John F Welch Jr’s filings →

More from the funding graph