Skip to content

· Private foundation

The John C Webb III and Marie S Webb Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$103kReligion$62kHuman Services$30kArts & Culture$28kPublic Benefit$21kEmployment$17kCrime & Legal$16kHealth$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$453k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DEMOPOLIS CITY SCHOOL FD$6,000
ST LEO CATHOLIC CHURCH$3,000
ALABAMA SCHOOL FOR HEALTHCARE SCIEN$2,500
BLACKBELT CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$2,000
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$1,500
THE FAMILY CONNECTION$1,500
TRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH$1,000
CANEBRAKE PLAYERS$1,000
THE LIGHTHOUSE WOMENS CENTER$1,000
PROJECT HORSESHOE FARMS$1,000
MARENGO COUNTY HISTORY AND ARCHIVES$1,000
TAYLOR POLK MEMERIAL SCHLORSHIP FUN$1,000
MARENGO COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$1,000
FRIENDS OF OLD SCHOOL$1,000
THE EXCEPTIONAL FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%BIG OAK RANCH: $3k → 13%BIG OAK RANCH: $2k → 13%BIG OAK RANCH: $2k → 13%BIG OAK RANCH: $2k → 13%BIG OAK RANCH: $2k → 13%BIG OAK RANCH: $2k → 13%BIG OAK RANCH: $2k → 13%BIG OAK RANCH: $1k → 13%BIG OAK RANCH: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$312k · 26 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
5

Total granted

$312k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+75%

Still filing today

35%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionArts & CultureHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BO
    BIG OAK RANCH INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $17k · revenue +105%
  • PH
    PROJECT HORSESHOE FARM
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +365%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF GAINESWOOD INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $8k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • AS
    ALABAMA SERVICE PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • WA
    WEST ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue -4%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Friends of the Alabama Governors Mansion Inc

To Preserve the Governors Mansion

Arts & Culture
2
The Bridge Inc

To provide treatment and rehabilitative services for juveniles and adults in alabama through contracts primarily with the alabama department of youth services and the alabama department of mental health.

Health
3
Alabama Restaurant & Hospitality Association Foundation
—
4
Calera Main Street Inc

Calera main street is a nonprofit organization that seeks to stimultae revitalization in downtown calera, alabama while maintaining a focus of historic preservation.

Community Improvement
5
Methodist Home for the Aging Dba Methodist Homes Corporation

Retirement and nursing home care

Human Services
6
Georgias Old Capital Heritage Center At the Depot

Establishment and administration of historical museum, working to educate and motivate, purchase artifacts ect for museum

Arts & Culture
7
Central Alabama Works

To facilitate implementation of workforce development programs andservices that support economic and job development in the region andthat address the workforce needs of existing businesses and industry.

—
8
Caring for Citizens of Alabama

Social services

Human Services
9
Food Bank of North Alabama Inc

collect warehouse & distribute food to needy organizations

Food & Nutrition
10
Community Food Bank of Central Alabama

To feed people in need today and foster collaborative solutions to end hunger tomorrow.

Food & Nutrition
11
The Alabama Masonic Home Inc

Support the charitable activities of the grand lodge of free & accepted masons of alabama

Health
12
Alabama Affordable Housing Association Inc

To promote the common interest of those involved in the development & management of rural multi-family housing.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Connection Inc; the most unlike its peers is Main Street Demopolis. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DEMOPOLIS CITY SCHOOL FD: $61,000 · OtherDEMOPOLIS CITY SCHOOL FDFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $24,000 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHDEMOPOLIS PUBLIC LIBRARY: $21,000 · OtherDEMOPOLIS PUBLIC LIBRARYDEMOPOLIS ROTARY CHARITY: $20,500 · OtherDEMOPOLIS ROTARY CHARITYST LEO CATHOLIC CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherST LEO CATHOLIC CHURCHDEPT OF HUMAN RESOURCES: $17,000 · OtherDEPT OF HUMAN RESOURCESTRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $16,000 · OtherTRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCHFAMILY CONNECTION INC: $13,500 · OtherBLACKBELT CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER: $12,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $11,000 · OtherTWO RIVERS ARTS COUNCIL: $9,000 · Other+14 more: $45,000 · Other+14 moreBIG OAK RANCH INC: $16,500 · Human ServicesPROJECT HORSESHOE FARM: $9,000 · Housing & ShelterFRIENDS OF GAINESWOOD INC: $7,500 · Arts & CultureCANEBRAKE PLAYERS: $1,000 · Arts & CultureTHE LIGHTHOUSE WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $4,000 · ReligionBIGTIME MINISTRIES: $1,000 · ReligionMAIN STREET DEMOPOLIS: $4,500 · Membership BenefitThe Children's Hospital of Alabama: $4,000 · HealthTHE EXCEPTIONAL FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$270,000Human Services$16,500Housing & Shelter$9,000Arts & Culture$8,500Religion$5,000Membership Benefit$4,500Health$4,000Recreation & Sports$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBIG OAK RANCH INC: $16,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY CONNECTION INC: $13,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetPROJECT HORSESHOE FARM: $9,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF GAINESWOOD INC: $7,500 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetMARENGO COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $7,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetMAIN STREET DEMOPOLIS: $4,500 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetTHE LIGHTHOUSE WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetThe Children's Hospital of Alabama: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EXCEPTIONAL FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWEST ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIGTIME MINISTRIES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCANEBRAKE PLAYERS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BIG OAK RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY CONNECTION INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HORSESHOE FARM ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF GAINESWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds MARENGO COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MAIN STREET DEMOPOLIS ↗
  • Who funds THE LIGHTHOUSE WOMEN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds The Children's Hospital of Alabama ↗
  • Who funds THE EXCEPTIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WEST ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds BIGTIME MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds CANEBRAKE PLAYERS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alabama Power Foundation IncAL21.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alabama Power Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · The Chicago Community Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The John C Webb III and Marie S Webb Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The John C Webb III and Marie S Webb Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The John C Webb III and Marie S Webb Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The John C Webb III and Marie S Webb Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John C Webb III and Marie S Webb’s filings →

    More from the funding graph