Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The John B & Marguerite M Owens Family Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2024still arriving
32
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$24kArts & Culture$17kFood & Nutrition$13kEnvironment$13kEducation$10kHuman Services$9kHealth$3kHousing & Shelter$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$250
Median grant
13
States reached
$184k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAUI FOOD BANK$1,750
YMCA OF CENTRAL FLORIDA$1,000
UNIVERSITY UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST$1,000
CHESAPEAKE BAY MARITIME MUSEUM$1,000
CORNERSTONE CHURCH$800
ST JAMES CHURCH$500
ACLU$500
LOW COUNTRY CHURCH$450
COVENANT WORD CHURCH$300
BALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ART$300
EARTHJUSTICE$300
ST CHRISTOPHER BY THE SEA$250
NANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION$250
CYLBURN ARBORETUM FRIENDS$250
NANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITAL$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%hope helps inc: $600 → 11%hope helps inc: $400 → 11%hope helps inc: $400 → 11%hope helps inc: $300 → 11%PACIFICA RESOURCE CENTER: $200 → 7%PACIFICA RESOURCE CENTER: $200 → 7%hope helps inc: $200 → 11%PACIFICA RESOURCE CENTER: $100 → 7%PACIFICA RESOURCE CENTER: $100 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
MN
NY
MA
SD
OH
RI
CA
UT
MD
AZ
NC
SC
DC
HI
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$88k · 48 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

48 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

48
24

Total granted

$88k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+22%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $700 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentArts & CultureEducationAnimalsHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MAUI FOOD BANK INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $12k · revenue +259%
  • CB
    CHESAPEAKE BAY MARITIME MUSEUM INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $7k · revenue +117%
  • BALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ART
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • CB
    CHESAPEAKE BAY MARITIME MUSUEM
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • SJ
    ST JAMES CHURCH LOTHIAN
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • Earth Island Institute Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $800 · revenue +78%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Balboa Park Conservancy

Balboa Park Conservancy (the Conservancy) was organized on November 3, 1923. The Conservancy is the City of San Diegos (the City) partner and advocated for the greater good of Balboa Park (the Park). The Conservancy collaborated with and…

2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

3
San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory

The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to the conservation of birds and their habitats through science and outreach.

Environment
4
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
5
Bartlett Arboretum Association Inc

To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.

Environment
6
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation

The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.

Animals
7
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
8
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
9
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

10
National Tropical Botanical Garden

To enrich life by perpetuating tropical plants, ecosystems and cultural heritage through discovery, scientific research, conservation, and education.

Environment
11
Natural Areas Conservancy Inc

The natural areas conservancy champions urban natural areas in new york city and across the nation through innovative research, partnerships, and advocacy. we increase the health and resilience of urban forests and wetlands, catalyze…

Environment
12
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of Ballona Wetlands and the most unlike its peers is Paws 4 a Cure Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Food Banks and PantriesLocal Food System Organizat…Cancer Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Local History MuseumsCommunity Arts CentersAnimal Rescue and Shelter
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 49 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr13%13%35–55yr16%47%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr16%44%20–35yr13%3%35–55yr16%47%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/44
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,521

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/38
Grantees still filing
31/38
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

YMCA OF CENTRAL FLORIDA — $8,000 · OtherYMCA OF CENTRAL FLORIDACOVENANT WORD CHURCH — $7,100 · OtherCOVENANT WORD CHURCHUNIVERSITY UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST — $5,300 · OtherUNIVERSITY UNITARIAN UNIVERSALISTST JAMES CHURCH — $3,400 · OtherST JAMES CHURCHNATURE IN THE CITY — $3,100 · OtherNATURE IN THE CITYST CHRISTOPHER BY THE SEA — $2,100 · Other+42 more — $25,849 · Other+42 moreCHESAPEAKE BAY MARITIME MUSEUM INC — $6,500 · Arts & CultureCHESAPEAKE BAY …BALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ART — $2,400 · Arts & CultureBALTIMORE MUSEU…NANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION — $2,000 · Arts & CultureNANTUCKET HISTO…GREATER RUXTON AREA FOUNDATION INC — $1,300 · Arts & CultureGREATER RUXTON …MARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $500 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $400 · Arts & CultureMAUI FOOD BANK INC — $12,200 · Food & NutritionMAUI FOOD BANK…CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · EnvironmentNANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC — $1,700 · EnvironmentCYLBURN ARBORETUM FRIENDS INC — $1,200 · EnvironmentBALLONA WETLAND LAND TRUST — $1,000 · EnvironmentEarth Island Institute Inc — $800 · Environment+4 more — $500 · EnvironmentST JOHN'S COLLEGE — $1,750 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $1,200 · EducationSTONELEIGH-BURNHAM SCHOOL — $850 · EducationKENYON COLLEGE — $850 · EducationNOTRE DAME DE NAMUR UNIVERSITY — $300 · EducationHOPE HELPS INC — $1,900 · Human ServicesFEED MY SHEEP INC — $750 · Human ServicesPacifica Resource Center — $600 · Human ServicesFLORIDA KEYS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INC — $1,100 · AnimalsPaws 4 A Cure Inc — $400 · AnimalsPET ALLIANCE OF GREATER ORLANDO INC — $200 · Animals
Other$54,849Arts & Culture$13,100Food & Nutrition$12,200Environment$7,200Education$4,950Human Services$3,250Animals$1,700

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC — $12,200 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY MARITIME MUSEUM INC — $6,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ART — $2,400 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION — $2,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE HELPS INC — $1,900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST JOHN'S COLLEGE — $1,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC — $1,700 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER RUXTON AREA FOUNDATION INC — $1,300 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCYLBURN ARBORETUM FRIENDS INC — $1,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $1,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA KEYS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INC — $1,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBALLONA WETLAND LAND TRUST — $1,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetLoyola University Maryland Inc — $1,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $900 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTONELEIGH-BURNHAM SCHOOL — $850 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetKENYON COLLEGE — $850 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetORGANIC CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION — $800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEarth Island Institute Inc — $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY SHEEP INC — $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGrand Avenue Economic Community Dev — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPacifica Resource Center — $600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSANCHEZ ART CENTER — $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF BALLONA WETLANDS — $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPaws 4 A Cure Inc — $400 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNOTRE DAME DE NAMUR UNIVERSITY — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUS LACROSSE FOUNDATION INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPET ALLIANCE OF GREATER ORLANDO INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNature Nexus Institute — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEXPECTED END MINISTRIES — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPacifica Environmental Family — $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLandPaths — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMULTICARE FOUNDATIONS — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAUI FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY MARITIME MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds BALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ART
  • Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds NANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds HOPE HELPS INC
  • Who funds ST JOHN'S COLLEGE
  • Who funds NANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds GREATER RUXTON AREA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CYLBURN ARBORETUM FRIENDS INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds FLORIDA KEYS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INC
  • Who funds BALLONA WETLAND LAND TRUST
  • Who funds Loyola University Maryland Inc
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds STONELEIGH-BURNHAM SCHOOL
  • Who funds KENYON COLLEGE
  • Who funds ORGANIC CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds Earth Island Institute Inc
  • Who funds FEED MY SHEEP INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

France-Merrick Foundation IncMD15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: France-Merrick Foundation Inc · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The John B & Marguerite M Owens Family Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Chesapeake Bay Maritime Museum Inc17% of income from government
  • Maryland Historical Society Inc9% of income from government
  • Loyola University Maryland Inc6% of income from government
  • Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc4% of income from government
  • Baltimore Museum of Art4% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc2% of income from government
  • St John's College2% of income from government
  • Nantucket Historical Association1% of income from government
  • Pet Alliance of Greater Orlando Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The John B & Marguerite M Owens Family Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The John B & Marguerite M Owens Family Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph