Skip to content

· Private foundation

The John & Sally Godfrey Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$351k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$219k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Crime & Legal$236kAnimals$92kHuman Services$84kEducation$57kHealth$49kReligion$32kArts & Culture$25kRecreation & Sports$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $107k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $219k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCOTTY'S HOUSE - CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$218,648
12TH MAN FOUNDATION$32,454
SCOTTY'S HOUSE - RAISE THE PAW MATCH$30,000
UT AUSTIN BRISCOE CENTER FOR AMERICAN HISTORY$25,000
BRAZOS VALLEY MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY$10,000
BRYAN CHOIR BOOSTER$10,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$7,500
ST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$5,000
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF TEXAS INC$5,000
SCOTTY'S HOUSE - WOMEN OF COURAGE$2,500
THE SALVATION ARMY$2,500
BRYAN ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY: $3k → 14%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY: $3k → 14%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY: $3k → 14%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY: $3k → 14%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY: $3k → 14%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY: $1k → 14%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$914k · 18 repeat orgs$98k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
13

Total granted

$914k
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+13%

Still filing today

50%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    Texas A&M University 12th Man Foundation
    4× · 2019–2025 · $56k · revenue +70%
  • TA
    Texas A&M Foundation
    6× · 2017–2023 · $53k · revenue +90%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    5× · 2019–2025 · $42k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • BV
    BRAZOS VALLEY MUSEUM
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • UP
    UNLIMITED POTENTIAL BRAZOS VALLEY
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • BV
    BRAZOS VALLEY CARES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $9k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Trust Gives
Philanthropy
2
Casa of the Brazos Valley Foundation

To provide financial support for the charitable programs and activities of Voices for Children, Inc. a nonprofit corporation 501(c)(3) that provides advocacy services to children in the child welfare system due to abuse and/or neglect.

Philanthropy
3
Texas Bankers Foundation
Education
4
Brazos Maternal and Child Health Clinic

To provide community-centered prenatal care and health education to medically indigent pregnant women in the Brazos Valley. Comprehensive, accessible and affordable prenatal care and health education are the best ways to improve pregnancy…

Health
5
Baylor Health Care System Foundation

To foster and support the activities and purposes of Baylor Scott & White Health, to encourage broad-based public support of the health care system and its affiliated institutions, and to advance the medical objectives, including…

Health
6
Bridge Ministries of Bryan Texas

To share Christ with others through serving those in need in the brazos valley and surrounding areas or wherever God leads and to bridge the gap by joining churches and other groups in serving together.

Religion
7
Genetic Resource Association of Texas
Health
8
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
9
Memorial for All Veterans of the Brazos Valley Inc

To build a memorial and educational venue that will honor all veterans of the Brazos Valley.

Arts & Culture
10
Brazos Valley Council on Alcohol and Substance Abuse

To provide guidance and support for persons affected by alcohol and substance abuse.

Health
11
Brazos Valley Affordable Housing Corporation

To provide quality services and products to the residents and businesses of our community in such a way as to maximize the affordability of safe and decent housing, especially for the low income; and to serve as a vehicle and assist in any…

Community Improvement
12
Brazos Athletic Booster Club

To engage in fundraising activities in support of Brazos ISD athletics and its students.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas a&M Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Bryan Choir Booster. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SCOTTY'S HOUSE - CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $424,528 · OtherSCOTTY'S HOUSE - CHILD ADVOCACY CENTERSCOTTY'S HOUSE- RAISE THE PAW MATCH: $120,000 · OtherSCOTTY'S HOUSE- RAISE THE PAW MATCHTHE SALVATION ARMY: $35,500 · OtherSCOTTY'S HOUSE CHILD ADVOCAY CENTER: $30,500 · Other+19 more: $180,068 · Other+19 moreTexas A&M University 12th Man Foundation: $56,261 · EducationTexas A&M Un…Texas A&M Foundation: $52,500 · EducationTexas A&M Fo…Bryan ISD Education Foundation: $5,500 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationAmerican Heart Association Inc: $41,500 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthBryan Choir Booster: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentHospice Brazos Valley Inc: $14,500 · Human ServicesBRAZOS VALLEY CARES INC: $9,000 · Human ServicesBrazos Valley Museum of Natural History: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF TEXAS INC: $5,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$790,596Education$115,261Health$42,000Youth Development$25,000Human Services$23,500Arts & Culture$10,000Crime & Legal$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTexas A&M University 12th Man Foundation: $56,261 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $52,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $41,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBryan Choir Booster: $25,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetTwin City Mission: $20,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHospice Brazos Valley Inc: $14,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBRAZOS VALLEY CARES INC: $9,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetBryan ISD Education Foundation: $5,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetBRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Way of the Brazos Valley: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAggieland Humane Society: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget40 DAYS FOR LIFE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPINK ALLIANCE: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Texas A&M University 12th Man Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds Bryan Choir Booster ↗
  • Who funds Twin City Mission ↗
  • Who funds Hospice Brazos Valley Inc ↗
  • Who funds Brazos Valley Museum of Natural History ↗
  • Who funds BRAZOS VALLEY CARES INC ↗
  • Who funds Bryan ISD Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds BRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds United Way of the Brazos Valley ↗
  • Who funds Aggieland Humane Society ↗
  • Who funds 40 DAYS FOR LIFE ↗
  • Who funds PINK ALLIANCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nina Heard Astin Charitable TrustMO17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nina Heard Astin Charitable Trust · The Donald and Donna Adam Family Foundation · Orr Waldon H and Adele Charitable Trust · Lucille and John B Dougherty Trust · Winkler Nina Astin Trust · Edge Eugene III Charitable Trust · Shell USA Company Foundation · Orr James Donald Charitable Trust · Bubba Moore Memorial Group Inc · Mervin and Annete Peters Family Foundation · M Bookman Peters Charitable Foundation · United Way of the Brazos Valley

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The John & Sally Godfrey Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The John & Sally Godfrey Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The John & Sally Godfrey Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The John & Sally Godfrey Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John & Sally Godfrey Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph