Skip to content

· Private foundation

The John & Patricia Gibbs Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$380k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$260k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$503kScience & Tech$260kFood & Nutrition$170kHuman Services$86kInternational$74kHealth$40kCommunity Improvement$15kEducation$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k25 grants · $85k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
  • $250k+1 grant · $260k
$3,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$311k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AUBURN UNIVERSITY$260,000
CHRISTIAN MISSIONS IN MANY LANDS$15,000
PIONEER COMMUNITY CHURCH$10,000
INTERNATIONAL NEEDS USA$10,000
WEST ORANGE DREAM CENTER$8,000
PIERCE COUNTY FOOD PANTRY$7,000
EDGEWOOD CHILDREN'S RANCH$6,000
GLOBAL CHURCH MINISTRIES$6,000
TRAINING2SEND MINISTRIES$5,000
ST JUDES CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$5,000
FAITH COMES BY HEARING$4,000
MOFFITT CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION$4,000
BURUNDI CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES$4,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$3,000
BRIDGES OF HOPE$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ISERVE MINISTRIES: $2k → 7%ISERVE MINISTRIES: $2k → 7%ISERVE MINISTRIES: $1k → 7%ISERVE MINISTRIES: $2k → 7%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%DIALOGICAL INTERACTION RECOVERY: $3k → 14%THE JOBS PARTNERSHIP OF FLORIDA: $2k → 13%THE JOBS PARTNERSHIP OF FLORIDA: $2k → 13%THE JOBS PARTNERSHIP OF FLORIDA: $2k → 13%THE JOBS PARTNERSHIP OF FLORIDA: $2k → 13%WEST ORANGE DREAM CENTER: $8k → 13%WEST ORANGE DREAM CENTER: $5k → 13%WEST ORANGE DREAM CENTER: $5k → 13%WEST ORANGE DREAM CENTER: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
VA
NM
TN
NC
SC
DC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$873k · 33 repeat orgs$315k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +73% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
18

Total granted

$873k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
+29%

Still filing today

45%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $277k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionHealthCivil RightsFood & NutritionPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GLOBAL CHURCH MINISTRIES CORP
    8× · 2017–2025 · $62k · revenue +119%
  • IN
    INTERNATIONAL NEEDS
    6× · 2018–2025 · $36k · revenue +37%
  • EC
    EDGEWOOD CHILDREN'S RANCH INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $27k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • MB
    MCGREGOR BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +29%
  • QI
    QUEST INC
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Reaching Out to the Nations Inc

Reaching Out To The Nations' mission is to both preach and demonstrate the love of Go through its projects and programs which include preaching, food distribution, widow and orphan assistance and leadership training.

Religion
2
Spirit Invasion Ministries

Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
3
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
4
Global Commission Partners Inc

Global commission partners is an evangelical missionary not for profit organization dedicated to evaluate and support native ministries who are planting the gospel of jesus christ among unreach people groups in poor countries.

Philanthropy
5
World for Jesus Ministries Inc

It is the purpose of world for jesus ministries, inc., to go to the nations, evangelize the lost, establish churches, raise up anointed ministries and provide specialized training for every possible leader.

—
6
Everything Laid Down Ministries

To give the gospel of Jesus Christ of Nazareth to the poor and dejected of the world. We do this by caring for widows, orphans, and broken people around the world. We care for hem by feeding, clothing, and encouraging them in Jesus by His…

Religion
7
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
8
Vision International Missions

To propagate the gospel of jesus christ; to examine candidates and appoint missionaries. to endorse missionary programs according to standards set forth in the new testament, to establish churches, church schools & mission societies in…

Religion
9
Airbridge Releief

AIRBRIDGE RELIEF plays a vital role in helping refugees and people in war-torn areas through planning, coordination and execution on the delivery and support of humanitarian aid. Our support and work involves helping in three major ways:…

Public Safety & Disaster
10
Feeding Hungry Children International

Provide food, shelter, and medical assistance for children around the world.

—
11
International Missions Support Services Inc

Minister the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Evangelize, preach and teach the Word of God and provide educational materials. Develop clean water, disaster relief, health projects, and Covid19 relief projects.

Religion
12
Global Faith Network
Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Windermere Wildfire Traveling Softball Team. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
17/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $260,000 · OtherAUBURN UNIVERSITYFAMILY CHURCH INC: $219,900 · OtherFAMILY CHURCH INCBURUNDI CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $58,500 · OtherBURUNDI CHRISTIAN MINISTRIESINTERNATIONAL NEEDS: $35,500 · OtherPIONEER COMMUNITY CHURCH INC: $35,000 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH WINDERMERE: $34,900 · Other+35 more: $196,340 · Other+35 moreDO GOOD FARM INC: $156,000 · Civil RightsDO GOOD FARM I…GLOBAL CHURCH MINISTRIES CORP: $61,616 · ReligionGREAT LAKES OUTREACH INC: $10,300 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,000 · Religion+1 more: $1,000 · ReligionLIFT DISABILITY NETWORK INC: $22,500 · Human ServicesWEST ORANGE DREAM CENTER INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE JOBS PARTNERSHIP OF FLORIDA INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesISERVE MINISTRIES INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesDialogical Interaction Recovery: $2,500 · Human Services+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesEDGEWOOD CHILDREN'S RANCH INC: $27,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 · HealthSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $6,000 · EducationWINNING FORE THE KIDS INC: $5,500 · Youth Development
Other$840,140Civil Rights$156,000Religion$82,916Human Services$65,000Health$32,000Education$6,000Youth Development$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDO GOOD FARM INC: $156,000 over 7y, 22% of budgetGLOBAL CHURCH MINISTRIES CORP: $61,616 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetINTERNATIONAL NEEDS: $35,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetEDGEWOOD CHILDREN'S RANCH INC: $27,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetLIFT DISABILITY NETWORK INC: $22,500 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetWEST ORANGE DREAM CENTER INC: $20,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetGREAT LAKES OUTREACH INC: $10,300 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPIERCE COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC: $9,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetTHE JOBS PARTNERSHIP OF FLORIDA INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetISERVE MINISTRIES INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWINNING FORE THE KIDS INC: $5,500 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetLIFENET INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION: $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINISTRY ARCHITECTURE INC: $5,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding Children Everywhere Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWINDERMERE WILDFIRE TRAVELING SOFTBALL TEAM: $2,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetIslego Missions Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DO GOOD FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL CHURCH MINISTRIES CORP ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL NEEDS ↗
  • Who funds EDGEWOOD CHILDREN'S RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFT DISABILITY NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST ORANGE DREAM CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GREAT LAKES OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds PIERCE COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JOBS PARTNERSHIP OF FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds ISERVE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WINNING FORE THE KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFENET INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MINISTRY ARCHITECTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Acahand FoundationDE13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Acahand Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The John & Patricia Gibbs Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The John & Patricia Gibbs Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The John & Patricia Gibbs Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The John & Patricia Gibbs Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John & Patricia Gibbs’ filings →

More from the funding graph