Skip to content

· Private foundation

The John and Matilda Shumsky Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$64k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$155kEducation$113kFood & Nutrition$36kHealth$25kHousing & Shelter$13kReligion$11k
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$869k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRAND TRAVERSE AREA CATHOLIC SCHOOLS$19,000
FATHER FRED FOUNDATION$10,500
MEALS ON WHEELS OF NORTHWEST MICHIGAN$6,000
STEP UP NORTHERN MICHIGAN$5,000
DIOCESE OF GAYLORD CATHOLIC HISPANIC APOSTLES$3,500
SINGLE MOMM$2,700
ST FRANCIS CHURCH$2,000
NORTHWEST MICHIGAN SUPPORTIVE HOUSING$2,000
ST MARY SCHOOL$2,000
ST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCH$2,000
SALVATION ARMY$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
CHRIST THE KING CATHOLIC CHURCH$1,000
IMMACULATE CONCEPTION CATHOLIC CHURCH$1,000
ST MARY OF HANNAH$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $84k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SINGLE MOMM: $3k → 10%NORTHWEST MICHIGAN SUPPORTIVE HOUSING: $2k → 7%SINGLE MOMM: $2k → 7%NORTHWEST MICHIGAN SUPPORTIVE HOUSING: $1k → 7%FATHER FRED FOUNDATION: $12k → 10%FATHER FRED FOUNDATION: $12k → 10%FATHER FRED FOUNDATION: $11k → 10%FATHER FRED FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%FATHER FRED FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%FATHER FRED FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%FATHER FRED FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%FATHER FRED FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%NORTHWEST MICHIGAN SUPPORTIVE HOUSING: $400 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$343k · 21 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
2

Total granted

$343k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+66%

Still filing today

24%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FATHER FRED FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $76k · revenue +15%
  • CF
    CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $21k · revenue +41%
  • SH
    SAFE HARBOR OF GRAND TRAVERSE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $10k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • IC
    IMMACULATE CONCEPTION CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • TH
    TRAVERSE HEALTH CLINIC AND COALITIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +66%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRAND TRAVERSE AREA CATHOLIC SCHOOLS: $99,000 · OtherGRAND TRAVERSE AREA CATHOLIC SCHOOLSCHILD & FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN INC: $20,700 · OtherCHILD & FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN INCDIOCESE OF GAYLORD CATHOLIC HISPANIC APOSTLES: $20,500 · OtherDIOCESE OF GAYLORD CATHOLIC HISPANIC APOSTLESMEALS ON WHEELS OF NORTHWEST MICHIGAN: $15,500 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS OF NORTHWEST MICHIGANSALVATION ARMY: $13,000 · OtherPREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $12,500 · Other+16 more: $77,200 · Other+16 moreFATHER FRED FOUNDATION: $76,000 · Human ServicesFATHER FRED FOUNDATIONSINGLE MOMM: $4,700 · Human ServicesSINGLE MOMMNORTHWEST MICHIGAN SUPPORTIVE HOUSING: $3,400 · Human ServicesSAFE HARBOR OF GRAND TRAVERSE INC: $9,700 · Housing & ShelterTRAVERSE HEALTH CLINIC AND COALITION: $1,000 · Health
Other$258,400Human Services$84,100Housing & Shelter$9,700Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFATHER FRED FOUNDATION: $76,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetCHILD & FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN INC: $20,700 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSAFE HARBOR OF GRAND TRAVERSE INC: $9,700 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetSINGLE MOMM: $4,700 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHWEST MICHIGAN SUPPORTIVE HOUSING: $3,400 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTRAVERSE HEALTH CLINIC AND COALITION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND TRAVERSE DYSLEXIA ASSOCIATION: $900 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FATHER FRED FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HARBOR OF GRAND TRAVERSE INC ↗
  • Who funds SINGLE MOMM ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST MICHIGAN SUPPORTIVE HOUSING ↗
  • Who funds TRAVERSE HEALTH CLINIC AND COALITION ↗
  • Who funds GRAND TRAVERSE DYSLEXIA ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Grand Traverse Regional Community FoundationMI26.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Grand Traverse Regional Community Foundation · Oleson Foundation · Hitchens Family Foundation · The Art and Mary Schmuckal Family Foundation · The Broad Family Foundation · The Julius H and Barbara B Beers Family Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The John and Matilda Shumsky Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The John and Matilda Shumsky Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The John and Matilda Shumsky Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The John and Matilda Shumsky Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John and Matilda Shumsky’s filings →

    More from the funding graph