Skip to content

· Private foundation

The John & Margaret Sinclaire Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$190k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Environment$442kHealth$126kCrime & Legal$111kAnimals$71kEducation$43kArts & Culture$36kHuman Services$27kFood & Nutrition$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$22,488
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLIMATE SOLUTIONS ACCELERATOR$60,000
GAYLORD SPECIALTY HOSPITAL$40,000
MOVING WITH HOPE$22,488
Individual grant recipient$22,488
THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER (BIVONIA)$20,000
GENESEE LAND TRUST$10,000
GREATER YELLOWSTONE COALITION$8,488
FOODLINK OF ROCHESTER$6,488
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ROCHESTER: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MT
MI
NY
NJ
CT
CA
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$881k · 21 repeat orgs$229k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
11

Total granted

$881k
$207k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+10%

Still filing today

48%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEnvironmentPublic BenefitCrime & LegalFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GY
    GREATER YELLOWSTONE COALITION
    5× · 2020–2025 · $81k · revenue +60%
  • GL
    Genesee Land Trust Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $65k · revenue +214%
  • THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER
    2× · 2021–2022 · $33k · revenue +167%

Funded once

  • CS
    Climate Solutions Accelerator of the Genesee-Finger Lakes Regiongraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $66k · revenue +352%
  • PR
    PROJECT RENEW
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • LC
    LIVONIA CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $28k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland

The Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland nurtures the connection between people and pets to advance animal welfare and improve the quality of life in our community.

Animals
2
Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc

Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements

Food & Nutrition
3
Animal Rescue Fund of the Hamptons Inc

THE ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS ACTIVELY RESCUES CATS AND DOGS, PROVIDES QUALITY CARE AND OFFERS SANCTUARY UNTIL LOVING HOMES CAN BE FOUND. ARF's work with animals, within our community and throughout the organization is guided by…

Animals
4
Danbury Animal Welfare Society

Danbury animal welfare society , inc.(daws) is a non-profit organization dedicated to improving the lives of animals in our community and beyond. we promote responsible pet guardianship and the humane treatment of animals, and work toward…

Animals
5
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
6
Lakeshore Legal Aid

Standing with our neighbors, Lakeshore Legal Aid fights poverty and injustice through advocacy and by providing meaningful and dignified access to the legal system.

Crime & Legal
7
Animal Rescue Corps Inc

To end animal suffering through direct and compassionate action, and to inspire the highest ethical standards of humanity towards animals. The Organization rescues animals who fall victim to abuse and natural disaster.

Animals
8
Animal Friends Rescue Project

The Organization is dedicated to finding life-long loving homes for stray, abandoned and abused cats and dogs. The Organization concentrates on networking with other animal welfare agencies in the county and throughout the state to provide…

Human Services
9
Genesee Valley Conservancy Inc

Protection of important natural resources, open space, habitat and agricultural lands in the Genesee River watershed through the use of land acquisition and conservation easements. Continued on Schedule O. Provide planning services to…

Environment
10
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
11
The Alliance for Collective Action

The Alliance for Collective Action convenes leaders of environmental and social movements to advance solutions for a thriving planet. We advance our mission through the Alliance Center building and community, as well as through Collective…

Environment
12
Tompkins County Spca

The mission of the SPCA of Tompkins County is to protect companion animals. We are a no-kill shelter dedicated to preventing animal cruelty and overpopulation. We promote responsible pet stewardship by providing education, counseling and…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Child Advocacy Center of Greater Rochester; the most unlike its peers is Metro Justice Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLIMATE SOLUTIONS ACCELERATOR: $228,875 · OtherCLIMATE SOLUTIONS ACCELERATORGAYLORD SPECIALTY HOSPITAL: $102,000 · OtherGAYLORD SPECIALTY HOSPITALIndividual grant recipient: $66,094 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPROJECT RENEW: $50,000 · OtherPROJECT RENEWTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER (BIVONIA): $50,000 · OtherTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER (BIVONIA)Individual grant recipient: $42,238 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOMMUNITY CULINARY SCHOOL OF NW CONNECTICUT: $28,218 · OtherLIVONIA CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $27,875 · OtherFine Arts Radio Inc: $26,265 · Other+13 more: $157,895 · Other+13 moreGREATER YELLOWSTONE COALITION: $81,488 · EnvironmentGREATER YELLOWSTONE C…Climate Solutions Accelerator of the Genesee-Finger Lakes Region: $66,000 · EnvironmentClimate Solutions Acc…Genesee Land Trust Inc: $65,462 · EnvironmentGenesee Land Trust In…ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY INC: $26,266 · AnimalsAnimal Rescue Foundation Inc: $7,370 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $6,934 · AnimalsTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER: $32,802 · Crime & LegalUNITED SPINAL ASSOCIATION INC: $16,083 · Public BenefitMETRO JUSTICE INC: $6,480 · Public BenefitFOODLINK INC: $11,488 · Food & NutritionTHEATERWORKS INC: $10,182 · Arts & Culture
Other$779,460Environment$212,950Animals$40,570Crime & Legal$32,802Public Benefit$22,563Food & Nutrition$11,488Arts & Culture$10,182

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER YELLOWSTONE COALITION: $81,488 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetClimate Solutions Accelerator of the Genesee-Finger Lakes Region: $66,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetGenesee Land Trust Inc: $65,462 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER: $32,802 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY INC: $26,266 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetFine Arts Radio Inc: $26,265 over 4y, 17% of budgetFRIENDS FOREVER: $18,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetUNITED SPINAL ASSOCIATION INC: $16,083 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF ROCHESTER INC: $15,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetFOODLINK INC: $11,488 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHEATERWORKS INC: $10,182 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATION: $7,866 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Promise of Greater Rochester Inc: $7,462 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAnimal Rescue Foundation Inc: $7,370 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $6,934 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETRO JUSTICE INC: $6,480 over 1y, 8.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER YELLOWSTONE COALITION ↗
  • Who funds Climate Solutions Accelerator of the Genesee-Finger Lakes Region ↗
  • Who funds Genesee Land Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Fine Arts Radio Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS FOREVER ↗
  • Who funds UNITED SPINAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF ROCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FOODLINK INC ↗
  • Who funds THEATERWORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Family Promise of Greater Rochester Inc ↗
  • Who funds Animal Rescue Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds METRO JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds SAINT'S PLACE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Esl Charitable FoundationNY17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Esl Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater Rochester and the Finger Lakes Inc · Rochester Area Community Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The John & Margaret Sinclaire Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The John & Margaret Sinclaire Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 49%
  • Christopher Reeve Foundation: 49% of income from government
  • Theaterworks Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The John & Margaret Sinclaire Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The John & Margaret Sinclaire Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John & Margaret Sinclaire’s filings →

More from the funding graph