Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Joe and Velma Dewitt Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$196kEducation$148kHuman Services$131kHousing & Shelter$35kHealth$10kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRYAN COLLEGE$10,000
LIFE ACTION MINISTRIES$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$5,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$5,000
NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION$5,000
THE CHURCH AT HARPETH HEIGHTS$5,000
TEACHING TO TEACH$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $127k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%COPPER BASIN CRISIS CENTER: $75k → 15%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%COPPER BASIN CRISIS CENTER: $20k → 15%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%COPPER BASIN CRISIS CENTER: $7k → 15%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$477k · 13 repeat orgs$68k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
2

Total granted

$477k
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+205%

Still filing today

77%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationReligionArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BRYAN COLLEGE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $120k · revenue +0%
  • LA
    LIFE ACTION MINISTRIES
    7× · 2018–2025 · $90k · revenue +40%
  • NR
    NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $35k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • BB
    BRAINERD BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • C
    CUL2VATEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +205%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northeastern Seminary

Northeastern seminary strives to be a vibrant source for christian theological formation whose students are formed in a biblical vision of gracious christianity and impact wholeness to the world in an expansive array of vocations and…

Education
2
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
3
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
4
Time of Grace Ministry

Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…

Religion
5
Mid-Atlantic Christian University

Mid-atlantic christian university is an undergraduate institution of christian higher learning whose mission is to impact the world by transforming ordinary people into extraordinary christian leaders. students are taught to think…

Education
6
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
7
Bibleproject

Bibleproject's mission is to help people experience the bible as a unified story that leads to jesus. this is achieved by creating biblical videos to be regularly released on a newly-created youtube channel. (continued on schedule o.)each…

Religion
8
Nashville Public Radio

Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.

Arts & Culture
9
247 Media Ministries

The mission of worship 24/7 is to ignite a passion for god through worship that results in a life of generosity, discipleship, evangelism, generosity and service.

Religion
10
Blue Letter Bible

The specific purpose of this corporation is to present a biblical, christian ministry of the gospel, hope, encouragement and strength to as many people as possible. the intent of those who will conduct this corporation's work is to present…

—
11
Christian Healthcare Ministries Inc

To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.

Religion
12
Winebrenner Theological Seminary

Winebrenner theological seminary equips leaders for service in god's kingdom.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nashville Rescue Mission; the most unlike its peers is Copper Basin Crisis Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COPPER BASIN CRISIS CENTER: $102,200 · Human ServicesCOPPER BASIN CRISIS CENTERWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INCCUL2VATE: $10,000 · Human ServicesCUL2VATE+1 more: $4,000 · Human ServicesBRYAN COLLEGE: $120,000 · EducationBRYAN COLLEGESTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $15,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOW…BRAINERD BAPTIST CHURCH: $50,000 · OtherBRAINERD BAPTIST CHURCHBRENTWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH: $25,500 · OtherBRENTWOOD BAPTIST CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $12,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…TEACHING TO TEACH: $10,000 · OtherTEACHING TO TEACHDREAM CATCHERS: $10,000 · OtherDREAM CATCHERSTHE CHURCH AT HARPETH HEIGHTS: $5,000 · Other+2 more: $5,500 · OtherLIFE ACTION MINISTRIES: $90,000 · ReligionLIFE ACTION MINIST…NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $35,000 · Housing & ShelterANKERBERG THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $25,000 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$141,200Education$135,000Other$118,500Religion$90,000Housing & Shelter$35,000Arts & Culture$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBRYAN COLLEGE: $120,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCOPPER BASIN CRISIS CENTER: $102,200 over 3y, 14% of budgetLIFE ACTION MINISTRIES: $90,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $35,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetANKERBERG THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCUL2VATE: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetDREAM CATCHERS: $10,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSHAOHANNAHS HOPE INC dba SHOW HOPE: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNASHVILLE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BRYAN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds COPPER BASIN CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LIFE ACTION MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds ANKERBERG THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CUL2VATE ↗
  • Who funds DREAM CATCHERS ↗
  • Who funds SHAOHANNAHS HOPE INC dba SHOW HOPE ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Clifton and Clara Ward FoundationTN17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Clifton and Clara Ward Foundation · Servant Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Joe and Velma Dewitt Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Joe and Velma Dewitt Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Joe and Velma Dewitt Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Joe and Velma Dewitt Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joe and Velma Dewitt’s filings →

More from the funding graph