Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Clifton and Clara Ward Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$799k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$1.5MHealth$1.4MReligion$590kPhilanthropy$410kHuman Services$350kCrime & Legal$225kYouth Development$70k
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $150k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $685k
  • $250k+1 grant · $799k
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRYAN COLLEGE CLARA WARD SCHOOL OF NURSING$799,061
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF FOX RIVER VALLEY$200,000
THE GENEROSITY TRUST$135,000
CASA KANE COUNTY$100,000
WILLIAMSBURG COMMUNITY CHAPEL$100,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER CHATTANOOGA$75,000
LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY$75,000
HAGGAI INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED LEADERSHIP TRAINING$25,000
BIBLE IN THE SCHOOLS$20,000
BETHEL BIBLE VILLAGE$20,000
TEACHING TO TEACH$20,000
ANKERBERG THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE$20,000
IDEALS FOUNDATION$15,000
LIFE ACTION MINISTRIES$15,000
NATIONAL CENTER FOR YOUTH ISSUES$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $170k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%RENEW THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $50k → 10%BETHEL BIBLE VILLAGE: $25k → 12%BETHEL BIBLE VILLAGE: $25k → 12%BETHEL BIBLE VILLAGE: $25k → 12%BETHEL BIBLE VILLAGE: $25k → 12%BETHEL BIBLE VILLAGE: $20k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.0M · 13 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against -31% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
3

Total granted

$3.0M
$155k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
-31%

Still filing today

85%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesReligionArts & CultureCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HAGGAI INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED LEADERSHIP TRAINING INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $125k · revenue +20%
  • BB
    Bethel Bible Village
    5× · 2020–2025 · $120k · revenue +31%
  • LA
    LIFE ACTION MINISTRIES
    5× · 2020–2025 · $75k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • BB
    BRAINERD BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • RT
    RENEW THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue -31%
  • LV
    LOOKOUT VALLEY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

3
Bethlehem Christian Academy Llc

The academy will seek to create a desire to know and serve god in the hearts of our students by equipping them academically, physically, spiritually, and socially to fulfill god's purpose for their lives.

Education
4
Houston Christian University

The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."

5
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
6
Faith Baptist Bible College

Post secondary and graduate educational institution The mission of Faith Baptist Bible College and Theological Seminary is to equip vocational Christian workers and other servant leaders while inspiring them to take the Word to the world.

Education
7
Arborbrook Christian Academy

Arborbrook Christian Academy partners with parents to equip, empower, and encourage students to cultivate godly character, pursue life-long learning, and love the Lord Jesus Christ.

Education
8
Central Christian College of the Bible

Central christian college of the bible (central) exists to develop servant-leaders for the church. as a traditional undergraduate bible college of the restoration movement, central equips faithful men and women for leadership ministry.

Education
9
Charlotte Christian College & Theological Seminary

To educate, train, and develop ministers, evangelists, missionaries, and other people who are going to enter the Christian ministry. Educate ministers and missionaries to serve the Lord.

Religion
10
Reformed University Inc

Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.

Education
11
Manna University

Manna University is a biblical higher education institution dedicated to educating, equipping, and empowering emerging leaders to change the world.

Education
12
Legacy Ministries International

Through prayerful dependence on god, dayton christian schools (lmi) provides a biblically integrated, academically rigorous educational experience. instilling in students a love for christ and god's word, a love for learning, and a love…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Haggai International Institute for Advanced Leadership Training Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ideals Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BRYAN COLLEGE CLARA WARD SCHOOL OF NURSING — $799,061 · OtherBRYAN COLLEGE CLARA WARD SCHOOL OF NURSINGDREAM CATCHERS — $565,000 · OtherDREAM CATCHERSCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF FOX RIVER VALLEY — $200,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF FOX RIVER VALLEYWILLIAMSBURG COMMUNITY CHAPEL — $100,000 · OtherBRAINERD BAPTIST CHURCH — $100,000 · OtherLIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY — $75,000 · Other+5 more — $145,000 · Other+5 moreBRYAN COLLEGE — $1,300,000 · EducationBRYAN COLLEGEPUBLIC SCHOOL BIBLE STUDY COMMITTEE — $65,000 · EducationIDEALS FOUNDATION INC — $65,000 · EducationSHAOHANNAHS HOPE INC dba SHOW HOPE — $180,000 · Human ServicesBethel Bible Village — $120,000 · Human ServicesRENEW THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER — $50,000 · Human ServicesCASA KANE COUNTY — $225,000 · Civil RightsCHATTANOOGA CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $135,000 · PhilanthropyThe Community Foundation of Greater Chattanooga Inc — $75,000 · PhilanthropyHAGGAI INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED LEADERSHIP TRAINING INC — $125,000 · ReligionLIFE ACTION MINISTRIES — $75,000 · ReligionANKERBERG THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $120,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,984,061Education$1,430,000Human Services$350,000Civil Rights$225,000Philanthropy$210,000Religion$200,000Arts & Culture$120,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBRYAN COLLEGE — $1,300,000 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetDREAM CATCHERS — $565,000 over 4y, 40% of budgetCASA KANE COUNTY — $225,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetSHAOHANNAHS HOPE INC dba SHOW HOPE — $180,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetHAGGAI INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED LEADERSHIP TRAINING INC — $125,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetANKERBERG THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $120,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetBethel Bible Village — $120,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetLIFE ACTION MINISTRIES — $75,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY — $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC SCHOOL BIBLE STUDY COMMITTEE — $65,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetIDEALS FOUNDATION INC — $65,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR YOUTH ISSUES — $60,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetRENEW THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER — $50,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BRYAN COLLEGE
  • Who funds DREAM CATCHERS
  • Who funds CASA KANE COUNTY
  • Who funds SHAOHANNAHS HOPE INC dba SHOW HOPE
  • Who funds CHATTANOOGA CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HAGGAI INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED LEADERSHIP TRAINING INC
  • Who funds ANKERBERG THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE
  • Who funds Bethel Bible Village
  • Who funds LIFE ACTION MINISTRIES
  • Who funds The Community Foundation of Greater Chattanooga Inc
  • Who funds LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds PUBLIC SCHOOL BIBLE STUDY COMMITTEE
  • Who funds IDEALS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR YOUTH ISSUES
  • Who funds RENEW THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Joe and Velma Dewitt FoundationTN17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Joe and Velma Dewitt Foundation · Weldon F Osborne Foundation Inc · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · Robert L & Kathrina H Maclellan Founda Foundation · Hugh and Charlotte Maclellan Charitable Charitable Trust · The Maclellan Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Clifton and Clara Ward Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Clifton and Clara Ward Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Clifton and Clara Ward Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph