Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Joe & Jan Larson Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$97kYouth Development$52kHuman Services$50kArts & Culture$38kPublic Benefit$16kHealth$12kHousing & Shelter$9kEducation$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,200
Median grant
4
States reached
$153k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PINNACLE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$8,045
Individual grant recipient$6,280
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$5,500
SALVATION ARMY$2,000
MORROW MEMORIAL HOME FOUNDATION$2,000
HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY$1,200
UMOM NEW DAY CENTERS$1,000
PHOENIX RESCUE MISSION$1,000
ST MARY'S FOOD BANK$1,000
BILLY GRAHAM FOUNDATION$1,000
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $2k → 19%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $2k → 19%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $1k → 19%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $1k → 19%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $1k → 19%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $1k → 19%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $1k → 19%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $1k → 19%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $1k → 19%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $200 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
OH
CA
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$306k · 20 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
20

Total granted

$306k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+63%

Still filing today

35%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionPublic BenefitHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PG
    PHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +126%
  • UN
    UMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $8k · revenue +23%
  • SM
    ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $7k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • GD
    GRANTSBURG DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • PP
    PINNACLE PEAK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $500
  • FL
    FAITH LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
2
Presbyterian Medical Services

Presbyterian medical services designs and delivers quality, integrated health, education, and human services in response to identified community needs of the multicultural people of the southwest.

Health
3
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
4
Mary's Shelter

Believing in the value of every life, mary's path empowers vulnerable teen mothers in foster care and their babies to create lives of dignity, hope and self-sufficiency.

Human Services
5
Christian Care Manor Ii Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

—
6
Christian Care Mesa Iii

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

Housing & Shelter
7
Villa Mary Immaculate

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. villa mary immaculate is a member of st. peter's health partners…

Health
8
St Marys Healthcare System for Children Inc

To serve as the sole member of the various health care and supporting organizations that comprise st. mary's healthcare system for children

Health
9
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
10
Time of Grace Ministry

Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…

Religion
11
Christian Care Mesa Ii Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Housing & Shelter
12
Pro Publica Inc

Pro publica is an independent, non-profit, pulitzer prize-winning newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest. our work focuses exclusively on truly important stories. [see continuation on schedule o] we produce…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PINNACLE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $81,675 · OtherPINNACLE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHCLASSIC RESIDENTS FOUNDATION: $38,100 · OtherCLASSIC RESIDENTS FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $23,705 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSALVATION ARMY: $23,249 · OtherSALVATION ARMYBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $21,200 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBBIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS: $20,500 · OtherBIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERSMORROW MEMORIAL HOME FOUNDATION INC: $13,000 · OtherASSISTANCE LEAGUE: $12,750 · OtherBILLY GRAHAM FOUNDATION: $12,100 · OtherBIG BROTHERS & BIG SISTERS OF BAY AREA: $10,000 · Other+20 more: $16,957 · Other+20 morePHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION: $9,200 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,500 · Religion+1 more: $500 · ReligionHospice of the Valley Inc: $10,600 · Human ServicesMAGGIE'S PLACE INC: $750 · Human Services+1 more: $200 · Human ServicesUMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC: $8,373 · Housing & ShelterST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $6,500 · Food & NutritionSANDRA DAY O'CONNOR INSTITUTE FOR AMERICAN DEMOCRACY: $3,000 · Community ImprovementTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $325 · Public BenefitLeadership Institute: $100 · Public BenefitCHRISTIAN ACTION NETWORK: $50 · Public Benefit
Other$273,236Religion$15,200Human Services$11,550Housing & Shelter$8,373Food & Nutrition$6,500Community Improvement$3,000Public Benefit$475

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMORROW MEMORIAL HOME FOUNDATION INC: $13,000 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetHospice of the Valley Inc: $10,600 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION: $9,200 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC: $8,373 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $6,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSANDRA DAY O'CONNOR INSTITUTE FOR AMERICAN DEMOCRACY: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMAGGIE'S PLACE INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMISSION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $325 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADOPT A PLATOON SOLDIER SUPPORT EFFORT INC: $132 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MORROW MEMORIAL HOME FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Hospice of the Valley Inc ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION ↗
  • Who funds UMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR INSTITUTE FOR AMERICAN DEMOCRACY ↗
  • Who funds MAGGIE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PLAY FOR PINK INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ADOPT A PLATOON SOLDIER SUPPORT EFFORT INC ↗
  • Who funds BARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Joe & Jan Larson Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Joe & Jan Larson Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Joe & Jan Larson Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Joe & Jan Larson Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joe & Jan Larson’s filings →

More from the funding graph