· Private foundation
The Jochum-Moll Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k26 grants · $66k
- $10k–50k25 grants · $431k
- $50k–250k13 grants · $1.3M
- $250k+2 grants · $1.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TALBOT HOUSE | $800,000 |
| THE CITY MISSION | $250,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - CHARLESTON SC | $225,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - BRADENTON FL | $225,000 |
| YOUTH FOR CHRIST - (GREATER CLEVELAND) | $120,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - NASHVILLE TN | $110,000 |
| CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY - OFFICE OF ADVANCEMENT SERVICES LOC 7035 | $100,000 |
| OHIO GUIDESTONE | $100,000 |
| CLAPHAM EDUCATION GROUP | $100,000 |
| BRADENTON CHRISTIAN SCHOOL | $75,000 |
| ST STEPHEN'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL | $74,613 |
| STAR CENTER FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| SAMARITAN'S PURSE | $50,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - TUPELO MS | $50,000 |
| REGIONAL REHAB CENTER | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $418k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
54 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 37 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- THTALBOT HOUSE INC3× · 2022–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +271% · 54% of their budget
- OOhioGuidestone4× · 2021–2024 · $375k · revenue +40%
- BCBradenton Christian School Society Inc DBA Bradenton Christian School3× · 2022–2024 · $258k · revenue +17%
Funded once
- MCMEDINA CHRISTIAN ACADEMYone grant, 2022 · $200k
MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +67%- SUSTRONGSVILLE UNITED METHODIST CHURCHone grant, 2023 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
United way of central ohio is the local organization that harnesses the power of communities working together - people, nonprofits, businesses and government - to create a stronger, more equitable central ohio. see schedule o.we do this…
Louisville collegiate school inspires academic excellence, extraordinary character and global citizenship.
We engage a diverse community of learners in a collaborative educational experience, preparing them for college success and a lifetime of meaningful engagement with the broader world.
The mission of new west charter school is to provide an academically rigorous, highly individualized education for 21st century students in grades 6 - 12. in the decades to come, personal success will require increasingly high levels of…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
All students learn the academic and personal skills they need to be truly prepared for postsecondary success and able to pursue their dreams.
Compass charter school is a safe and nurturing educational environment that honors the individuality of each learner. by engaging in a process of inquiry, our graduates will be equipped with the necessary skills to lead fulfilling personal…
The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…
Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Greater Cleveland and the most unlike its peers is Wake Forest University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
77 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 77 of the 132 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TALBOT HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds OhioGuidestone ↗
- Who funds Bradenton Christian School Society Inc DBA Bradenton Christian School ↗
- Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CREATE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND YOUTH FOR CHRIST INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL INVENTORS HALL OF FAME INC ↗
- Who funds STAR CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTH RIDGEVILLE COMMUNITY CARE INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds BUILDING HOPE IN THE CITY ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER CLEVELAND ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MEDINA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN POLICY ROUNDTABLE ↗
- Who funds OHIO CITY BICYCLE COOP INC ↗
- Who funds MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH MISSISSIPPI INC ↗
- Who funds Clapham Education Group ↗
- Who funds CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
- Who funds THE CLEVELAND MUSIC SCHOOL SETTLEMENT ↗
- Who funds YOUTH CHALLENGE ↗
- Who funds Episcopal Day Private School of Manatee County Inc ↗
- Who funds BOULDER COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · The Swagelok Foundation · The Sk Wellman Foundation · Giant Eagle Foundation · The Reinberger Foundation · Community West Foundation · The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation · The Kelvin & Eleanor Smith Foundation · The O'Neill Brothers Foundation · Emma R Fox Char Trust Mut Fds · Higley Fund of the Cleveland Foundation · The Louise H & David S Ingalls Fdn
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Jochum-Moll Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mote Marine Laboratory Inc — 4% of income from government
- Bishop Museum of Science and Nature Inc — 2% of income from government
- Connecticut College — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Jochum-Moll Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Jochum-Moll Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.