Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Joan H Brack Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$290k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Human Services$353kHealth$302kScience & Tech$300kCrime & Legal$75kEmployment$60kPublic Benefit$20kFood & Nutrition$1k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
$40,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$555k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CRSI FOUNDATION INC- ROBERT B BRACK$200,000
SOUTH MIDDLESEX OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL$40,000
COALITION OF IMMOKALEE WORKERS$40,000
HOPE FLOATS HEALING & WELLNESS$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $343k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SOUTH MIDDLESEX OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL: $88k → 8%SOUTH MIDDLESEX OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL: $80k → 8%SOUTH MIDDLESEX OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL: $80k → 8%SOUTH MIDDLESEX OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL: $40k → 8%SOUTH MIDDLESEX OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL: $40k → 8%JFS OF METROWEST: $15k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$953k · 5 repeat orgs$158k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +138% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
7

Total granted

$953k
$158k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+138%
+18%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationCivil RightsPhilanthropyEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    SOUTH MIDDLESEX OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $328k · revenue +83%
  • HF
    HOPE FLOATS HEALING & WELLNESS CENTER INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $190k · revenue +19%
  • ML
    METROWEST LEGAL SERVICES INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $75k · revenue +138%

Funded once

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +44%
  • TV
    THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue -34%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF METROWEST INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +42%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network Inc

The mission of Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network (DFCCN) is to promote and support, directly or indirectly, the interests and purposes of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI).

Health
2
Fcancer

FCANCER IS dedicated to advancing health equity through early detection and prevention programs, and by providing resources to navigate, manage, and cope with cancer.

Health
3
The Federation of Massachusetts Farmers and Gardeners Markets Inc

Mass farmers markets partners wtih farmers, consumers, and communities to improve the health of individuals, strenghten community vitality, and enhance local farm viability through farmers markets.

Food & Nutrition
4
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

5
Brighton Marine Inc

Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.

Health
6
Mabel Center for Immigrant Justice

Mabel center's mission is to provide expert pro bono legal services to asylum-seeking families that have been seperated, detained in family detention centers, and/or subjected to expedited removal through dedicated docket.

Crime & Legal
7
Work on Climate

Supporting industry transformation towards climate-positive and make green careers transitions and driving the adoption of green workforce development practices broadly.

Environment
8
Jennifer S Fallick Cancer Support Center

At the center, our mission is to give strength, guidance and support to anyone living with a cancer diagnosis, as well as to their loved ones.

Human Services
9
Massachusetts Fair Housing Center Inc

Mfhc is committed to ending systemic housing discrimination and creating inclusive communities through education, outreach, advocacy, housing counseling and enforcement.

Housing & Shelter
10
Metrowest Chamber of Commerce Inc

To further economic development and promote the economic well-being of the metrowest region of massachusetts.

11
Metrowest Center for Independent Living Inc

Mwcil enhances the full participation of persons with disabilities in the community.

12
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Service of Metrowest Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CRSI FOUNDATION INC- ROBERT B BRACK — $300,000 · OtherCRSI FOUNDATION INC- ROBERT B BRACKMETROWEST LEGAL SERVICES INC — $75,000 · OtherMETROWEST LEGAL SERVICES INCSOUTH MIDDLESEX OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL INC — $328,000 · Human ServicesSOUTH MIDDLESEX OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL …JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF METROWEST INC — $15,000 · Human Services+1 more — $10,000 · Human ServicesHOPE FLOATS HEALING & WELLNESS CENTER INC — $189,898 · EducationHOPE FLOATS HEALING…Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $100,000 · HealthDana-Farber…SHARED BEAT — $10,000 · HealthSHARED BEATThe Coalition of Immokalee Workers Inc — $60,000 · EmploymentTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER — $20,000 · Civil RightsHALEY CREMER FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · PhilanthropyTHE NATICK COMMUNITY ORGANIC FARM INC — $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$375,000Human Services$353,000Education$189,898Health$110,000Employment$60,000Civil Rights$20,000Philanthropy$2,000Food & Nutrition$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOUTH MIDDLESEX OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL INC — $328,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE FLOATS HEALING & WELLNESS CENTER INC — $189,898 over 5y, 20% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROWEST LEGAL SERVICES INC — $75,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetThe Coalition of Immokalee Workers Inc — $60,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF METROWEST INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSHARED BEAT — $10,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetHALEY CREMER FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTHE NATICK COMMUNITY ORGANIC FARM INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Metrowest Health Foundation IncMA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Metrowest Health Foundation Inc · The Sudbury Foundation · Middlesex Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for MetroWest Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Joan H Brack Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 10%
  • South Middlesex Opportunity Council Inc18% of income from government
  • Metrowest Legal Services Inc10% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Joan H Brack Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Joan H Brack Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph