· Private foundation
The Sudbury Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k73 grants · $357k
- $10k–50k61 grants · $1.3M
- $50k–250k3 grants · $207k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METROWEST | $100,000 |
| THE WAYSIDE INN FOUNDATION | $57,000 |
| COLLEGE PLANNING COLLABORATIVE | $50,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST | $45,000 |
| CISA (COMMUNITY INVOLVED IN SUSTAINING AGRICULTURE) | $40,000 |
| BOSTON AREA GLEANERS | $40,000 |
| REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL | $40,000 |
| OARS | $40,000 |
| SPOONFULS | $40,000 |
| MASS FOOD SYSTEM COLLABORATIVE | $40,000 |
| SUDBURY HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $39,000 |
| LITERATIONS | $34,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ASSABET VALLEY | $34,000 |
| THE CARROT PROJECT - TSNE | $33,000 |
| MILL CITY GROWS | $33,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
171 repeat relationships — 88 still active in FY2024, 83 since wound down; 39 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $508k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METROWEST INC8× · 2017–2024 · $925k · revenue +66%
- DWDOC WAYNE INC7× · 2017–2023 · $482k · revenue +196%
- REREGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL INC7× · 2018–2024 · $341k · revenue +224%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $50k
- MCMETROWEST COLLEGE PLANNING COLLABORATIVEone grant, 2023 · $50k
- PFPARTNERSHIPS FOR A SKILLED WORKFORCE INCone grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -62%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Dean college is a private, residential new england college grounded in a culture and tradition that all students deserve the opportunity to discover and exceed their greatest aspirations. a personal and transformative community since 1865,…
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
Emmanuel college is a coed, residential catholic liberal arts and sciences college with 2,112 undergraduate and graduate students.
Wpi transforms lives, turns knowledge into action to confront global challenges, and revolutionizes stem through distinctive and inclusive education, projects and research. (http://www.wpi.edu/about/mission.html)
Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northeastern University and the most unlike its peers is Gifts of Hope Unlimited Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
176 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 176 of the 282 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METROWEST INC ↗
- Who funds DOC WAYNE INC ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds SUDBURY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds BOSTON AREA GLEANERS INC ↗
- Who funds THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
- Who funds MILL CITY GROWS INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY INVOLVED IN SUSTAINING AGRICULTURE INC ↗
- Who funds OUT METROWEST INC ↗
- Who funds SPOONFULS ↗
- Who funds Community Foundation for MetroWest Inc ↗
- Who funds THE WAYSIDE INN ↗
- Who funds SPARK KINDNESS INC ↗
- Who funds Jeff's Place Children's Bereavement Center Inc ↗
- Who funds HOOPS AND HOMEWORK INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds WAYSIDE YOUTH AND FAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ASSABET VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF METROWEST INC ↗
- Who funds METROWEST YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE GUILD FOR HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds JOHN ANDREW MAZIE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds METROWEST LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds SMILE MASS INC ↗
- Who funds DISCOVERY MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds GAINING GROUND INC ↗
- Who funds BETHANY HILL PLACE ↗
- Who funds THRIVE SUPPORT AND ADVOCACY INC ↗
- Who funds THINKGIVE INC ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds THE METROWEST FREE MEDICAL PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds EMPLOYMENT OPTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE METROWEST INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Middlesex Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for MetroWest Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Metrowest Health Foundation Inc · Avidia Charitable Foundation Inc · MutualOne Charitable Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · DCU for Kids · Boston Foundation Inc · GivenGain Foundation USA · Greater Lowell Community Foundation Inc · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Sudbury Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Employment Options Inc — 100% of income from government
- Oars Inc — 100% of income from government
- Thrive Support and Advocacy Inc — 93% of income from government
- Mab Community Services Inc — 69% of income from government
- Advocates Inc — 66% of income from government
- Reach Beyond Domestic Violence Inc — 53% of income from government
- Metrowest Mediation Services Inc Dba Framingham Court Mediation Services — 47% of income from government
- The Guild for Human Services Inc — 44% of income from government
- World Farmers Inc — 39% of income from government
- Community Involved in Sustaining Agriculture Inc — 35% of income from government
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
- Metrowest Young Men's Christian Association Inc — 33% of income from government
- Samaritans Inc — 31% of income from government
- University of Delaware — 30% of income from government
- Boston Area Gleaners Inc — 20% of income from government
- South Middlesex Opportunity Council Inc — 18% of income from government
- Doc Wayne Inc — 15% of income from government
- Nashoba Learning Group Inc — 14% of income from government
- Rise Above Foundation Inc — 14% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- Fresh Start Furniture Bank Inc — 12% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- Sudbury Valley Trustees Inc — 11% of income from government
- Metrowest Legal Services Inc — 10% of income from government
- Out Metrowest Inc — 9% of income from government
- Brandeis University — 9% of income from government
- The Learning Center for the Deaf Inc — 9% of income from government
- Communities for Restorative Justice Inc — 8% of income from government
- One Can Help Inc — 8% of income from government
- Hudson Community Food Pantry Inc — 8% of income from government
- Mill City Grows Inc — 7% of income from government
- Open Table Inc — 7% of income from government
- Northeastern University — 7% of income from government
- Regional Environmental Council Inc — 6% of income from government
- The Boys and Girls Club of Assabet Valley Inc — 5% of income from government
- Hoops and Homework Inc — 5% of income from government
- Gaining Ground Inc — 5% of income from government
- Crossroads Continuum Inc — 5% of income from government
- Metro Community Development Corporation — 5% of income from government
- Community Foundation for MetroWest Inc — 4% of income from government
- Discovery Museum Inc — 3% of income from government
- Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
- Girls Incorporated of Worcester — 2% of income from government
- Trustees of Clark University — 2% of income from government
- Think Outside the Vox — 2% of income from government
- Regis College — 2% of income from government
- Boys and Girls Clubs of Metrowest Inc — 2% of income from government
- Wayside Youth and Family Support Network Inc — 1% of income from government
- Spark Kindness Inc — 1% of income from government
- American International College — 1% of income from government
- Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
- Sudbury Historical Society Inc — 1% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Middlebury College — 1% of income from government
- Mcphs University — 1% of income from government
- Simmons University — 1% of income from government
- Wellesley College — 1% of income from government
- Wgbh Educational Foundation — 1% of income from government
- The Trustees of Mount Holyoke College — 1% of income from government
- Merrimack College — 1% of income from government
- Suffolk University — 1% of income from government
- Fairfield University — 1% of income from government
- Minute Man Arc for Human Services Inc — 1% of income from government
- Bentley University — 1% of income from government
- Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc — 1% of income from government
- Assumption University — 0% of income from government
- Quinnipiac University — 0% of income from government
- Curry College — 0% of income from government
- Connecticut College — 0% of income from government
- Amherst College Trustees — 0% of income from government
- Wheaton College — 0% of income from government
- Emerson College — 0% of income from government
- Philanthropy Massachusetts Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Sudbury Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Sudbury Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.