Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jms Foundation for Children

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$17kPhilanthropy$12kInternational$4kEnvironment$4kHealth$2kArts & Culture$2kEducation$835Food & Nutrition$770Other$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$125
Median grant
7
States reached
$62k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BEEBE FOUNDATION$1,916
ROSA HEALTH CENTER$1,000
COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER$750
LONGWOOD GARDENS$400
LEWES HISTORICAL SOCIETY$320
MILTON FOOD PANTRY$270
CATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK$258
RAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY$250
WHYY$200
CAPE HENLOPEN BOYS' LACROSSE$200
Individual grant recipient$200
NATIONAL PARKS FOUNDATION$200
CENTER FOR ACTION & CONTEMPLATION$150
REHOBOTH ART LEAGUE$125
Individual grant recipient$125
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DELAWARE HOSPICE: $100 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
PA
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
DE
NM
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$37k · 30 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
23

Total granted

$37k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+37%

Still filing today

60%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalEnvironmentHealthCivil RightsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WHYY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1k · revenue +36%
  • CENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1k · revenue +31%
  • LF
    LEWES FIRE DEPARTMENT INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $425 · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • FU
    FAITH UMC
    one grant, 2020 · $500
  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $500 · revenue -15%
  • SD
    SOUTHERN DE FOR RACIAL JUSTICE
    one grant, 2024 · $370
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Delaware Museum of Nature and Science Inc

The museum is an educational corporation formed to ignite a life-long passion for exploring, discovering, and valuing nature and science.

—
2
Friends of the Delaware Canal Inc

The friends of the delaware canal is an independent, non-profit organization working to restore, preserve, and improve the delaware canal and its surroundings.

Environment
3
Federation of State Conservation Voter Leagues Dba Nj League of Cons Voters

New jersey lcv is the statewide political voice for the environment. working with our allies in the community, we advocate for strong environmental policies, support our environmental justice partners in pursuing more equitable policies,…

—
4
Delaware Center for Justice

The delaware center for justice, inc. seeks to ensure an effective, efficient, and equitable system of justice in delaware through advocacy, direct services, research and public education.

Crime & Legal
5
Partnership for the Delaware Estuary Inc

Partnership for the delaware estuary, inc. (pde), host of the delaware estuary program, leads collaborative, science-based efforts to improve the delaware river and bay, which covers portions of delaware, new jersey, and pennsylvania.

Environment
6
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
7
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
8
Delaware River Greenway Partnership Inc

Delaware River Greenway Partnership is a non-proift, non-partisan organization that educates the public in support of the natural and cultural resources along the Delaware River and its tributaries

Environment
9
Western Pennsylvania Conservancy

The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…

Environment
10
Delaware Advancement Corporation

To aggressively promote investment in muncie-delaware county which will result in the creation and retention of quality job opportunities and enhance the quality of life in our community.

—
11
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
12
Delaware Agricultural Museum Association

The organization's mission is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret the history and technology of delaware and the delmarva peninsula's farm life/culture and to offer public education programs and services related to aspects of the…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Delaware Nature Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is Longwood Gardens Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
22/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REHOBOTH BEACH EPWORTH UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $14,377 · OtherREHOBOTH BEACH EPWORTH UNITED METHODIST CHURCHBEEBE FOUNDATION: $11,596 · OtherBEEBE FOUNDATION+47 more: $10,350 · Other+47 moreWORLD VISION INC: $2,866 · InternationalWORLD VIS…United States Association for UNHCR: $570 · InternationalUnited St…RAZOM INC: $462 · InternationalRAZOM INCMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $200 · International+1 more: $75 · InternationalWHYY INC: $1,120 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION: $1,020 · Arts & CultureTHE LEWES HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $320 · Arts & CultureREHOBOTH ART LEAGUE INC: $175 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $50 · Arts & CultureTHE ROSA HEALTH CENTER INC: $1,000 · HealthDELAWARE BREAST CANCER COALITION INC: $500 · HealthAmerican Botanical Council: $100 · HealthCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $750 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $275 · EnvironmentDELAWARE NATURE SOCIETY INC: $250 · EnvironmentCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $250 · EnvironmentLONGWOOD GARDENS INC: $400 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF CAPE HENLOPEN STATE PARK: $250 · PhilanthropyFOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC: $500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$36,323International$4,173Arts & Culture$2,685Health$1,600Environment$1,525Philanthropy$650Food & Nutrition$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWORLD VISION INC: $2,866 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWHYY INC: $1,120 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION: $1,020 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROSA HEALTH CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $570 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $550 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDELAWARE BREAST CANCER COALITION INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAZOM INC: $462 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLEWES FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $425 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLONGWOOD GARDENS INC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST SIDE NEW BEGINNINGS INC: $400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLEWES PUBLIC LIBRARY INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $275 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $275 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF CAPE HENLOPEN STATE PARK: $250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDELAWARE NATURE SOCIETY INC: $250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $175 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREHOBOTH ART LEAGUE INC: $175 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $175 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDELAWARE PACEM IN TERRIS INC: $150 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP REHOBOTH INC: $130 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Botanical Council: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOLARIS PROJECT: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS DELAWARE INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds WHYY INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ROSA HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds United States Association for UNHCR ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB ↗
  • Who funds DELAWARE BREAST CANCER COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC ↗
  • Who funds RAZOM INC ↗
  • Who funds LEWES FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds LONGWOOD GARDENS INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST SIDE NEW BEGINNINGS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LEWES HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds LEWES PUBLIC LIBRARY INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF CAPE HENLOPEN STATE PARK ↗
  • Who funds DELAWARE NATURE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Delaware Community Foundation IncDE35.4× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Delaware Community Foundation Inc · The Carl M Freeman Foundation Inc · Longwood Foundation Inc · Happy Difference Foundation · Incyte Charitable Giving Foundation · United Way of Delaware · Crestlea Foundation Inc · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jms Foundation for Children funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jms Foundation for Children. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Lewes Fire Department Inc: 41% of income from government
  • Delaware State Troopers Association: 41% of income from government
  • The Rosa Health Center Inc: 35% of income from government
  • Camp Rehoboth Inc: 33% of income from government
  • Lewes Public Library Inc: 27% of income from government
  • Food Bank of Delaware Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Delaware Nature Society Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Rehoboth Art League Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Delaware Breast Cancer Coalition Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Milton Arts Guild Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Delaware Pacem in Terris Inc: 4% of income from government
  • The Lewes Historical Society Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Special Olympics Delaware Inc: 3% of income from government
  • West Side New Beginnings Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Delaware Hospice Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jms Foundation for Children’s filings →

More from the funding graph