· Private foundation
The Jko Foundation Charitable Trust
Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Read this first · the figures below need context
89% of The Jko Foundation Charitable Trust’s FY2019 grant dollars went to Infaith Community Foundation, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2019 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year The Jko Foundation Charitable Trust named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $29k. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2018
- Under $10k10 grants · $19k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GETHSEMANE LUTHERAN CHURCH | $10,000 |
| ST MATTHIAS EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $8,000 |
| CAMPANILE CENTER FOR THE ARTS | $5,500 |
| MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION | $1,350 |
| UW MEDICINE | $1,000 |
| ELIM CHRISTIAN SERVICES | $500 |
| ST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $500 |
| UNIVERSITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH | $500 |
| CORNWALL CHURCH | $500 |
| MENTAL HEALTH COLORADO | $350 |
| AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION | $350 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 62% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Jko Foundation Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jko Foundation Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Jko’s filings →